Evo X Ralliart taillights on Apex Silver
Newbie
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 22
Likes: 0
From: South Broward
Waiting on the same situation, I like them, looks better than the stock evo taillights. I have a GGx (think they would look great), but called the dealer and it's like almost $800 for the set 
Thread Starter
Evolving Member
iTrader: (2)
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 423
Likes: 0
From: Barstow, Cali
You know what's crazy....do some research and look at the actual gains tuners are seeing replacing the UICP on the stock turbo. The last I saw from ETS showed like 0.02whp gains from their pipe from stock. It is pretty much across the board that on the stock turbo the gains from replacing the stock UICP are not very much on the stock turbo. I though there would be better gains. But I do agree that stock one is not easy on the eyes lol.
You know what's crazy....do some research and look at the actual gains tuners are seeing replacing the UICP on the stock turbo. The last I saw from ETS showed like 0.02whp gains from their pipe from stock. It is pretty much across the board that on the stock turbo the gains from replacing the stock UICP are not very much on the stock turbo. I though there would be better gains. But I do agree that stock one is not easy on the eyes lol.
Thread Starter
Evolving Member
iTrader: (2)
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 423
Likes: 0
From: Barstow, Cali
^^Did you read the bolton (with no tuning) thread from ETS.
https://www.evolutionm.net/forums/evo-x-dyno-results/383850-ets-extreme-turbo-systems-evo-x-dyno-tuning-results-thread.html
"Base, Boost Controller, Intake, Test Pipe, Catback
All of the modifications before this point were done on stock exhaust. We figured we would use the stock exhaust for most of the runs since the number 1 question we get is how quite is your exhaust. You can't really beat the stock exhaust for stealth! We now have added the Test Pipe and Catback and gained 95.82 whp over stock! (NO TUNING)
Base, Boost Controller, Intake, Test Pipe, Catback, UICP
At this point we are running on stock intercooler piping and decided to switch out the restrictive UICP and see if we could make a little more power. We gained 95.88 whp over stock! The UICP did not really add to the peak hp, but the average amount of HP over the stock UICP is greater."
The UICP changed added 0.06 whp over the last dyno run with the stock on. I was actually not happy to see this. I swore one of my first mods would be to replace that ugly factory UICP. But this thread got me thinking. Maybe their UICP is just no good? Maybe I'm reading it wrong? I hope I am. Cause I want one of these bad....
https://www.evolutionm.net/forums/evo-x-dyno-results/383850-ets-extreme-turbo-systems-evo-x-dyno-tuning-results-thread.html
"Base, Boost Controller, Intake, Test Pipe, Catback
All of the modifications before this point were done on stock exhaust. We figured we would use the stock exhaust for most of the runs since the number 1 question we get is how quite is your exhaust. You can't really beat the stock exhaust for stealth! We now have added the Test Pipe and Catback and gained 95.82 whp over stock! (NO TUNING)
Base, Boost Controller, Intake, Test Pipe, Catback, UICP
At this point we are running on stock intercooler piping and decided to switch out the restrictive UICP and see if we could make a little more power. We gained 95.88 whp over stock! The UICP did not really add to the peak hp, but the average amount of HP over the stock UICP is greater."
The UICP changed added 0.06 whp over the last dyno run with the stock on. I was actually not happy to see this. I swore one of my first mods would be to replace that ugly factory UICP. But this thread got me thinking. Maybe their UICP is just no good? Maybe I'm reading it wrong? I hope I am. Cause I want one of these bad....
^^Did you read the bolton (with no tuning) thread from ETS.
https://www.evolutionm.net/forums/evo-x-dyno-results/383850-ets-extreme-turbo-systems-evo-x-dyno-tuning-results-thread.html
"Base, Boost Controller, Intake, Test Pipe, Catback
All of the modifications before this point were done on stock exhaust. We figured we would use the stock exhaust for most of the runs since the number 1 question we get is how quite is your exhaust. You can't really beat the stock exhaust for stealth! We now have added the Test Pipe and Catback and gained 95.82 whp over stock! (NO TUNING)
Base, Boost Controller, Intake, Test Pipe, Catback, UICP
At this point we are running on stock intercooler piping and decided to switch out the restrictive UICP and see if we could make a little more power. We gained 95.88 whp over stock! The UICP did not really add to the peak hp, but the average amount of HP over the stock UICP is greater."
The UICP changed added 0.06 whp over the last dyno run with the stock on. I was actually not happy to see this. I swore one of my first mods would be to replace that ugly factory UICP. But this thread got me thinking. Maybe their UICP is just no good? Maybe I'm reading it wrong? I hope I am. Cause I want one of these bad....
https://www.evolutionm.net/forums/evo-x-dyno-results/383850-ets-extreme-turbo-systems-evo-x-dyno-tuning-results-thread.html
"Base, Boost Controller, Intake, Test Pipe, Catback
All of the modifications before this point were done on stock exhaust. We figured we would use the stock exhaust for most of the runs since the number 1 question we get is how quite is your exhaust. You can't really beat the stock exhaust for stealth! We now have added the Test Pipe and Catback and gained 95.82 whp over stock! (NO TUNING)
Base, Boost Controller, Intake, Test Pipe, Catback, UICP
At this point we are running on stock intercooler piping and decided to switch out the restrictive UICP and see if we could make a little more power. We gained 95.88 whp over stock! The UICP did not really add to the peak hp, but the average amount of HP over the stock UICP is greater."
The UICP changed added 0.06 whp over the last dyno run with the stock on. I was actually not happy to see this. I swore one of my first mods would be to replace that ugly factory UICP. But this thread got me thinking. Maybe their UICP is just no good? Maybe I'm reading it wrong? I hope I am. Cause I want one of these bad....
https://www.evolutionm.net/forums/ev...icp-shame.html
I need to do some more research and see why are there soo many different opinions. I suspect it may have something to do with the fact in the ETS runs they put the UICP last when it already had almost all the bolt on in place. If their first mod had been UICP im sure they wouldve seen much bigger gains from that.
