New IX . Please Correct me if I'm wrong
Originally Posted by Jussb1aze
I don't have a HFC, I have the stock one which flows well enough not to pay to upgrade to a HFC. If I do replace it, it'll be a test pipe.
I was at 270/272 after getting flashed, putting on a mbc and my catback yielded 328/305 on the same dyno. The mbc is spiking at 21-22psi and holding to 18-19. I really don't think the mbc gave all sixty peak hp.
I was at 270/272 after getting flashed, putting on a mbc and my catback yielded 328/305 on the same dyno. The mbc is spiking at 21-22psi and holding to 18-19. I really don't think the mbc gave all sixty peak hp.
Of course I could be wrong and would like to see a dyno and know whos exhaust!
Lowbdgt, come on man, those are basic acronyms for the simplest of mods on the Evo. You need to at least do SOME searching instead of asking us to spoonfeed you everything. MBC/EBC stands for Manual/Electronic Boost Controller.
No, djscoto, an EBC is not "safer" in and of itself, but it does retain use of the stock boost control solenoid, which means the ECU is still in the loop. This may allow the ECU to back off boost in an emergency situation, but I'm not sure how that works, since the EBC is controlling the boost.
No, djscoto, an EBC is not "safer" in and of itself, but it does retain use of the stock boost control solenoid, which means the ECU is still in the loop. This may allow the ECU to back off boost in an emergency situation, but I'm not sure how that works, since the EBC is controlling the boost.
Evolved Member
iTrader: (20)
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 4,941
Likes: 0
From: Danville/Blackhawk, California
Putting an MBC on an EVO 9 is like driving a 911 with spare tires up front. Yep, it can be done. And yep, it will work. But it's not as safe as using the factory boost control system as it completely bypasses all the boost control safety strategies which are integrated into the factory ECU. Not only does it eliminate the ability of the ECU to drop boost if conditions go south, it also eliminates the MAF based closed loop logic which ensures that max engine load is reasonably constant despite big changes in ambient conditions. If that's okay with you, rock on with your $40 ball and spring MBC on your $30,000 investment

-shiv

-shiv
Originally Posted by Warrtalon
Lowbdgt, come on man, those are basic acronyms for the simplest of mods on the Evo. You need to at least do SOME searching instead of asking us to spoonfeed you everything. MBC/EBC stands for Manual/Electronic Boost Controller.
I apologize for that, thats why i couldnt find what it was because they were just acronyms.
Originally Posted by shiv@vishnu
Putting an MBC on an EVO 9 is like driving a 911 with spare tires up front. Yep, it can be done. And yep, it will work. But it's not as safe as using the factory boost control system as it completely bypasses all the boost control safety strategies which are integrated into the factory ECU. Not only does it eliminate the ability of the ECU to drop boost if conditions go south, it also eliminates the MAF based closed loop logic which ensures that max engine load is reasonably constant despite big changes in ambient conditions. If that's okay with you, rock on with your $40 ball and spring MBC on your $30,000 investment

-shiv

-shiv
Evolved Member
iTrader: (20)
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 4,941
Likes: 0
From: Danville/Blackhawk, California
Originally Posted by SRT-TO-EVO
Good info Shiv. So you're suggesting EBC's are better/safer? I never knew this coming from the SRT world (MAP sensor), thinking they both did the same thing, just one was more show friendly. So they do have a actual "meaningful" purpose besides raising boost in a fancier way.
Shiv
Some of the packages offer the best bang for the buck. But since your local, just stop by works, vishnu, gruppe-s. All the tuners are good its just a matter of preference. With the tune at works I did not have to worry about MBC/EBC because their flashes offer 20psi to readline with no taper and it does not bypass the ECU. The Flash is expensive 599 but its well worth it.
Last edited by evo637; May 9, 2006 at 03:10 PM.
Originally Posted by shiv@vishnu
Hiya-- Aftermarket EBCs can be a better option than a simple el cheapo MBC but not by much. They still either target a desired manifold pressure which is not as useful as targeting a desired MAF consumption rate. Nor do they offer any low boost fail safe modes that can be triggered in case of something going wrong. In these instances, the factory ECU (appropriately remapped) is the best solution for control boost. We even rely on it when controlling big Garret turbos.
Shiv
Shiv
Evo637, the boost always tapers unless your max boost is no higher than the taper point...it's just a natural thing that the stock turbo does, since it can't sustain certain boost levels at high rpm. People always make "holds XX psi to redline," but they've never logged their boost with a MAP sensor to see that it actually falls ALWAYS, but there's nothing wrong with that.
Originally Posted by Warrtalon
Evo637, the boost always tapers unless your max boost is no higher than the taper point...it's just a natural thing that the stock turbo does, since it can't sustain certain boost levels at high rpm. People always make "holds XX psi to redline," but they've never logged their boost with a MAP sensor to see that it actually falls ALWAYS, but there's nothing wrong with that.
Isnt looking at a boost guage accurate enough to determine boost pressure.



