Notices
EvoM New Member / FAQs / EvoM Rules New member? Come on in, introduce yourself, and get acquainted with the evolutionm.net posse :) FAQs will also be answered in here.

IX MR or GSR?? or 335i??

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 8, 2006 | 08:45 AM
  #46  
nashmage's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 218
Likes: 0
From: Dartmouth, Mass
IMO i would just go with the gsr i dont really feel that the extra for the mr is worth it. I would save that money for mods or anything else you need the money for.
Reply
Old Oct 14, 2006 | 01:21 PM
  #47  
Dr. SS's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 846
Likes: 0
From: Chicago
id get the 335i
Reply
Old Oct 14, 2006 | 06:08 PM
  #48  
Golovko's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 209
Likes: 0
From: Raleigh, NC
Originally Posted by dingleberries
I'm not supporting that the MR is slower. I just had some disagreements with what Golovko said.
if you own a MR...add 4kg to your roof then drive a slamon and then remove the 4kgs and try again..you will see a HUGE difference.

also the suspension is a big difference.

and I bought my Evo for track purposes.
Reply
Old Oct 18, 2006 | 05:48 PM
  #49  
matyb's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 492
Likes: 0
From: south jersey
I Am A Bmw Tech And I Have To Say That Its Probably One Of The Most Fun Cars To Drive In Are Line Up But Its Apples And Oranges. Plus The E90 Is Not A Low Maintinance Car, Buy That I Mean, We Got Problems. I Could Prob. Get Fired If Someone At Bmwna Read This, But Its The First Turbocharged Motor We Have Ever Mass Produced Let Alone A Valvtronic Turbo. Were Im Going With This Is That If You Do Decide On The 335 Be Paticient With Your Service Department Were Trying!!!!!
Reply
Old Oct 18, 2006 | 06:08 PM
  #50  
-=SPECTRE=-'s Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 638
Likes: 0
From: Secret Volcano Island
if you own a MR...add 4kg to your roof then drive a slamon and then remove the 4kgs and try again.
I don't care what you say, I'm not putting 4kgs of salmon on my roof!!

Reply
Old Oct 18, 2006 | 06:15 PM
  #51  
DanJ's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 776
Likes: 0
From: Central Mass
Originally Posted by matyb
I Am A Bmw Tech And I Have To Say That Its Probably One Of The Most Fun Cars To Drive In Are Line Up But Its Apples And Oranges. Plus The E90 Is Not A Low Maintinance Car, Buy That I Mean, We Got Problems. I Could Prob. Get Fired If Someone At Bmwna Read This, But Its The First Turbocharged Motor We Have Ever Mass Produced Let Alone A Valvtronic Turbo. Were Im Going With This Is That If You Do Decide On The 335 Be Paticient With Your Service Department Were Trying!!!!!
Bmw has made previous turbocharged motors before. this is NOT the first turbocharged engine bmw has made.
Reply
Old Oct 19, 2006 | 10:13 PM
  #52  
dramsey's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 21
Likes: 0
From: Reno, NV
Originally Posted by matyb
I Am A Bmw Tech And I Have To Say That Its Probably One Of The Most Fun Cars To Drive In Are Line Up But Its Apples And Oranges. Plus The E90 Is Not A Low Maintinance Car, Buy That I Mean, We Got Problems. I Could Prob. Get Fired If Someone At Bmwna Read This, But Its The First Turbocharged Motor We Have Ever Mass Produced Let Alone A Valvtronic Turbo. Were Im Going With This Is That If You Do Decide On The 335 Be Paticient With Your Service Department Were Trying!!!!!
Wow, they don't teach history at the BMW tech schools these days, do they?

Not only was there the famous 2002 Turbo of the late 70s, but a number of current European Beemer Diesels are turbo engines.
Reply
Old Oct 22, 2006 | 10:21 AM
  #53  
matyb's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 492
Likes: 0
From: south jersey
i have to start off by saying that you guys are so quick to jump off topic to correct (or think your correcting) that you lose point of what the original discusion was, its really quite anoying. #1-it was early 70s,(73-75) not exactly shure, #2-they made 1600 or so(that is a far cry from mass produced and U.S. NEVER SAW THEM) #3- did i really have to say gasoline,the n54 is gasoline, i mean if you want next time ill state ocatne rating, injector style ill get all the specs for you. #4- shut up and take the post for what its worth instead of being so critical, everything i posted was most likely understood by the people WHO WERE INTERESTED IN THE TOPIC. finally and my point is think if anything you stated or i stated helps in his decision on a 335 or not so you wasted rotazs' time my time and your time when you could have just shut up.
Reply
Old Oct 23, 2006 | 06:10 AM
  #54  
dc4ever83's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 110
Likes: 0
From: Los Angeles,CA
lease the 335 since you only plan on keeping it for two years
Reply
Old Oct 23, 2006 | 06:31 AM
  #55  
MRunner's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 29
Likes: 0
From: Chicago
Is kinda funny..almost everyone have to compare an Evo, Sti and 335 when they make a purchase. I traded in a 04 M3 for a 06 MR. Tested all the cars as much as i wanted. I don't modified my cars except tires and light weight rims. Following is my reasoning on getting the MR. Pretty straight forward.

STI= best daily driving car, due to the low end torque. BUT damn ugly.....
335=excellant driving machine, pissed because have to pay above MSRP...
MR=last year of 4G63, got it $3k under MSRP....

btw...the $5k diff. for a MR comapre to a IX is so worth it if consider about the 2lbs saving on each forged wheel, 20 lbs on the aluminium roof, 6 speed and blistein. If you do does mod after market, I don't think $5k will be enuf.
Reply
Old Oct 24, 2006 | 10:54 AM
  #56  
supasixfo's Avatar
Newbie
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 73
Likes: 0
From: CT
re:

two very different cars for very different reasons. i dunno where you're from, but if it snows heavily. go with the EVO. once the weather hits, the evo will really shine. stock for stock, the bmw will probably be a better dd, nicer interior, higher civilization index for spring/summer. mod wise, the 4g63 is time tested. throw 8-10k worth of mods on the evo (difference in cost of 335 vs evo) and i'm sure u'll have a pretty competitive evo. RWD against AWD handling is also very very different. if you like drifts, go with the bmw. if you like drifting in the snow, go with the evo.

i've had an evo viii mr for a little over a year and a half. still stock except for underbody protection. it still impresses me, on tarmac, on dirt, on snow. - i dunno where the evo keeps pulling tricks out of its bag, but the car is absolutely amazing, u will not be disappointed.

it all comes down to what you want to do with your car, mods, autox, rally, track, drag, the evo is very versatile. we run the winter road rally series in the finger lakes region upstate NY. you can do that with an evo. you'd be hard pressed to try anything like that in the 335i..and not slide into a ditch.

the MR stood out in my head cause it's rare, and every part is fully functional. the bilsteins are basically dampers that keep the car pinned to the ground. the roof lowers the mass. 6th gear is handy for 130+.

Last edited by supasixfo; Oct 24, 2006 at 11:06 AM.
Reply
Old Oct 24, 2006 | 11:02 AM
  #57  
tuffguy's Avatar
Evolved Member
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 778
Likes: 1
From: CA
I was faced with the same decision when I got my Evo.

I test drove the 335i, and even though it's a very, very nice car ($51k optioned out the way that I like), it just did not leave me as giddy as the Evo. It's fast, but you don't feel the speed. The cabin is a very nice place to be.

It depends on what you want. You could always get the Evo, drive it for a year, absorb the depreciation, and then get the 335i next year. That way you won't have any regrets.
Reply
Old Oct 24, 2006 | 06:07 PM
  #58  
matyb's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 492
Likes: 0
From: south jersey
just to totally **** everyone off and provide an envious atitude for all of you, it looks like bmw is supose to be starting up there lease insentive prog. for employes (they want us driving there cars (we payone third the lease) so ill have a very easy solution to this ?
BOTH YEA ILL HAVEM BOTH!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!
Reply
Old Dec 17, 2006 | 07:41 PM
  #59  
NightShifter's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 86
Likes: 0
From: Maryland
Originally Posted by DreamLike1
Sigh, no... they're not identicle on the track. I believe it was road and track this did a full length test of the Evo MR, GSR, and RS on a road course and the MR was the fastest.

sorry but there is definitely a difference.
No the RS was the fastest. 0 - 60 in 4.3 sec, 1/4 13.1

MR 0 - 60 4.5 sec 1/4 13.4
IX 0 - 60 4.6 secn 1/4 13.5
Reply
Old Dec 17, 2006 | 07:43 PM
  #60  
Snicewicz's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 79
Likes: 0
From: Columbus, Ohio
hooray for weight reduction
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 08:29 AM.