For spreading misinformation and for being a total retard.

 

To say Mitsu DID not develop the chassis and then give it a thumbs down?
Do you know what DCX stands for?

 

Just ignore sonicnofadz. The more you ignore him or her the sooner he will fade away into oblivion. He is totally irrelevant as a human being.

 

By that same logic you must be a butt lover for the Evo 6. Is that right?

 

i'm sure there will be coilovers and other mods to lighten up the car, heck if you have ***** remove the front and rear bars it will save like 50+lbs than if you don't have enough weight reduction remove the door bars too front and rear, but it would totally suck if you get hit. And remeber because a lot of people get killed in accidents the federal govt is changing the laws around to reduce road deaths and other similar stuff

 

Perhaps I am an idiot, I still think it is unclear whether or not (or how much) DCX had any influence on the design of the chassis (no one has any hard proof). At any rate it is really too early to tell if the new platform will be a flop, and it is getting tiresome to argue this over and over again. I think its safe to say that the new chassis will be heavier, but suspension and drivetrain design will be better to compensate for its weight problems. If you ask me, it is a little alarming how the Evo has been getting heavier and heavier every generation. Maybe the Evo 13 will be a schoolbus? Vigo you are a tard spasm.

 

You said in your first post in this thread Chrysler developed the chassis, not Mitsu. Now your contradicting yourself saying "its unclear." I thought you said Chrysler developed it. You are correct, it is too early to tell anything. So why do you continue to bash the new chassis?

And yes, the Evo 13 will be a school bus. A nice short bus. You can use it to get you to and from your special education activities...

 

I said this because there are contradictory reports of who developed what. Chrysler's involvement in the chassis and engine development are undeniable however. No one will ever probably know who was responsible for what, much like how things went when designing the 1G DSM chassis. Actually, I did ride the short bus in elementary school! I am not here to argue over the superiority/inferiority of the prototype X. This thread is in reference to the Evo's chassis.

 

sonicnofadz is a retard. It amazes me that he drives. Pointing at you and laughing!

 

I love my 2003 100% Japanese Manufactured/Assembled Evo.

All other Evo's are not 100%.

The Evo X will be 60% Japan, 30% USA, 10% Canadian

 

Where does it say that? Proof and links please.

 

So basically because your not sure who created what, your going to go around posting it was Chrysler, not Mitsu who developed the Evo X chassis? That makes perfect sense...

 

On the piece of paper thats stuck to the car when you buy it. 2003 was the only year the Evo was 100% Japanese, (maybe 2004 also, not sure).

I was joking about the Evo X stats.

 

No, the Evo X part that you said.

 

Vigo, all you can do is call people names. Why don't you actually try providing some proof to your claims?