what trim is this evo? most of the ix's i've seen doesn't have that rear bumper. i'm a canadian buyer looking into an ix and that's the exact colour and trim i want it in.

http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/Mitsu...1%7C240%3A1308

 

Rs

 

Looks like an RS and it has the JDM Evo 9 rear bumper. Looks like he also swapped the interior and taillights with an Evo 8. Also has an Evo 8 wing.

 

+1

 

yah i seen that car and most of the evo 9 parts were swapped out...like tail lights, interior and wheels. Its a gsr not a RS.

 

being that the door handles and mirrors are black then it means it's an rs, with aforementioned parts swapped out I'd be sceptical of the motor, the title says 2.4 but description says 2.0........

 

not to mention it's been modded quite a bit.

 

run a carfax and it will tell you what it is.

 

how would you explain the black handles and black mirrors?

 

its a IX gsr with evo VIII parts...a crazy amount of evo VIII parts...id look for something else...

 

It's definitely an RS the vin proves it and its lacking ABS a pretty clear indication. Vin was decoded here.
http://www.motoverse.com/tools/vinDe...AH36C36U014393

2006 MITSUBISHI LANCER EVLTN RS AWD
VIN: JA3AH36C36U014393

World region: Asia

Manufactured in: Japan

Year: 2006

Make: Mitsubishi

Model: LANCER EVLTN RS AWD

Body style: Sedan 4 Door

Transmission: 5 Spd Manual

Drive type: AWD

Fuel type: Gas

Cylinders: 4 Cylinders

Safety restraints: Dual Front Air Bags

Standard options: Air Conditioning, Power Steering, Power Brakes, Tilt Wheel, AM/FM Stereo, Compact Disc

 

wow, thanks for the info guys. not really caught up on the last gen evos. but seeing the prices of the X in Canada, the recently legalized in canada evo ix seems attractive. but you are all saying it's got evo 8 parts?

 

Its a RS. Even Carfax.com states it.

 

It's got the VIII seats, tail lights, wheels (I think), and wing. Why he swapped out all those parts, I don't understand, but whatever. I wouldn't get it, but it's awesome that they legalized the IX.

 

cant argue with the vin as long as it really is that vin, but it would make more sense if it were an 8 just with a ix front bumper....dont understand why anyone would want all of thhose 8 parts..imo everything he replaced with 8 parts were better on the ix...but to each his own i guess...like the others said though, i would steer clear of this one