Any interior pics of the new EVO 9?
i heard the inside is gonna have 9 15 inch monitors....a nos ready button....martian skin recaro seats....built in 6545464646 disc cd changer and new 12 inch plasma ray gun sub which weighs 1 pound!! but thats just what i heard...
Originally Posted by Kinmar_X
i seriously doubt your gonna see the mivec engine until the X if at all. mitsu isnt gonna drop the 4g63. i really doubt the authenticity of that picture
announced in japan for their ix evo. there are official
mitsubishi videos with gil panizzi (mitsubishi's rally driver)
driving and talking about the 4g63 mivec powered evo ix.
do a search...
joe
Originally Posted by zakenjanei
it's a 4g63 mivec. the picture is real - it's been officially
announced in japan for their ix evo. there are official
mitsubishi videos with gil panizzi (mitsubishi's rally driver)
driving and talking about the 4g63 mivec powered evo ix.
do a search...
joe
announced in japan for their ix evo. there are official
mitsubishi videos with gil panizzi (mitsubishi's rally driver)
driving and talking about the 4g63 mivec powered evo ix.
do a search...
joe
just my .02...
Originally Posted by Kinmar_X
i seriously doubt your gonna see the mivec engine until the X if at all. mitsu isnt gonna drop the 4g63. i really doubt the authenticity of that picture
if i had a scanner i'd put the article up on here so you could see the pictures (and read the story if you can read japanese). there aren't really any interior shots in the magazine, but it has a similar shot of the MIVEC head and some nice exterior shots. here are the specs from the magazine:
2005 Mitsubishi Evo IX (Evo VIII MR numbers listed for comparison)
Engine
4G63 MIVEC Turbo (4G63 Turbo)
4 cylinder DOHC (4 cylinder DOHC)
1997cc (1997cc)
280ps at 6500rpm (280ps at 6500rpm)
40.8 kgm at 3000-4500rpm (40.8 kgm at 3500rpm)
Auto Climate
I agree,
I think that the Old Evo 7 dash that the USDM 8 appears to have is out dated, definitely need auto climate like the rest of the world has and the narrow Recaro's with higher Side Bolsters.
But once again we'll get the watered down version, basically an RS II and I want all the creature comforts I can get, So I guess I am going to have to import mine and get the full blown 9.
Folding Mirrors too, Evo 7 U.K. had folding mirrors and the U.K. 8 has
I think that the Old Evo 7 dash that the USDM 8 appears to have is out dated, definitely need auto climate like the rest of the world has and the narrow Recaro's with higher Side Bolsters.
But once again we'll get the watered down version, basically an RS II and I want all the creature comforts I can get, So I guess I am going to have to import mine and get the full blown 9.
Folding Mirrors too, Evo 7 U.K. had folding mirrors and the U.K. 8 has
Originally Posted by BlewBuYou66
yeah but if the evo had a nicer interior then it would make it all around one of the nicest tuner cars to have.
Auto climate
in dash 6 Disc CD PLAYER NOT A SEPERATE CHANGER
Auto-dim mirror
Outside TEMP
Better seats IMHO
Cruise Control
etc.. AND C'MON Its window swtiches and glove compartment are all lighted.
One of the many reasons EVO purchase made me think otherwise. I am NOT really a fan of STI but for the money, it is a much more overal better value.
Yeah JaguarS4R
I also agree with Cruise Control too, to me they are little things that make the difference, the icing on the cake as it were.
Maybe then the guys from Top gear and Fifth gear would rate the Evo better than the Slowbaru's
Maybe then the guys from Top gear and Fifth gear would rate the Evo better than the Slowbaru's
Originally Posted by Samdiver74
Maybe then the guys from Top gear and Fifth gear would rate the Evo better than the Slowbaru's
Hey he,s just stating his opinion...and it is true that the stock STI is faster than an stock Evo on the straightaway...dont flame his **** for that.
Originally Posted by JaguarS4R
Only reason is b/c the evo they test is FQ300 and FQ320 v.s. the regular STI. The USDM EVO is barely even FQ300 but more like FQ260. USDM STI is actually faster than USDM EVO, stock v.s. stock (straight line) NOT bends.
Originally Posted by JaguarS4R
Only reason is b/c the evo they test is FQ300 and FQ320 v.s. the regular STI. The USDM EVO is barely even FQ300 but more like FQ260. USDM STI is actually faster than USDM EVO, stock v.s. stock (straight line) NOT bends.
Previously, Top Gear tested the Evo VIII FQ300 compared to the STI PPP, both cars with 300bhp.
Then last year, they tested the MR FQ320 against the STI WR1, both cars with 330bhp.
The USDM Evo VIII MR Edition is pretty close to the JDM spec MR. AFAIK, it has the same engine and turbo, merely losing the SAYC.



