Notices
General Engine Management / Tuning Forum Discuss general EMS tuning concepts that do not pertain to a specfic brand or product.

stock '05 on Mustang dyno...anyone?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 26, 2006 | 07:23 PM
  #16  
Warrtalon's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 20,790
Likes: 2
From: Long Island, NY
I'm not in the Truth Squad, despite your continued desire to reference it. I don't know what "untruth" I've spread anyway. Your numbers are as high as people on Dynojets. In fact, your torque is higher than a lot of 05s on Dynojets, so what's your point? Most REAL Mustang dynos that are not calibrated to read HIGH will not read anywhere near 235whp on a stock 05. This is not an opinion, and it's not rocket science - it's just fact. There are a bunch of high-reading MDs out there for whatever reason. If there are different models that read differently, then that doesn't matter either. I don't see people posting "I made 235/255 on the Special High-Reading Mustang Dyno version." No, people just say, "I got xxx/xxx on a Mustang Dyno," then some noob gets upset when they go to a real MD that reads low and get 20-30 less whp. It's a damn shame that it's so different, and it's even more of a shame that people like you argue against it in such a nasty tone.

You love to point out Dave's dyno, but what about Gruppe-S? I don't have any love for them and have never even interacted with them, but their MD reads very low, too, as it should. You don't see people going to Dave's MD or the Gruppe-S dyno then going to a Dynojet and seeing numbers within 1-2% like people do in Orlando when going to Aerocomp or CFT. Why would you so adamantly defend this when your numbers were and ARE obviously extremely high for a Mustang Dyno? I don't get it...
Reply
Old Jan 27, 2006 | 05:31 AM
  #17  
TTP Engineering's Avatar
Account Disabled
iTrader: (465)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 8,824
Likes: 2
From: Central FL
Originally Posted by Warrtalon
You love to point out Dave's dyno, but what about Gruppe-S? I don't have any love for them and have never even interacted with them, but their MD reads very low, too, as it should. You don't see people going to Dave's MD or the Gruppe-S dyno then going to a Dynojet and seeing numbers within 1-2% like people do in Orlando when going to Aerocomp or CFT. Why would you so adamantly defend this when your numbers were and ARE obviously extremely high for a Mustang Dyno? I don't get it...
You love to degrade others, whether shops, or people. CFT and aerocomp have two different models as well HOWEVER the IMP model at aerocomp was set at factory calibration during my baseline run. It was recalibrated weeks down the line after that run. I have no problem stating it was readjusted, but it was not different than FACTORY settings by Tim Gentil at the time of the baseline run HENCE why others are getting like numbers to mine.

The 404.6whp 445.1tq was done at CFT on what I believe to be a 500 series Mustang Dyno with older firmware than BR. The tq is high due to a 33psi spike, much like BR used to do in his testing and dyno thread.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
ouminan
GSC Motorsports - Charleston, SC
9
Jan 9, 2015 10:48 PM
Bster13
Evo Tires / Wheels / Brakes / Suspension
45
Jan 12, 2009 06:41 AM
Bster13
Northeast Region
16
Apr 10, 2008 07:31 PM
Fourdoor
Evo Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain
27
Sep 17, 2005 07:47 AM
JTB
Evo Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain
44
Mar 24, 2005 06:47 PM




All times are GMT -7. The time now is 05:41 AM.