What's the difference between the 3?

 

https://www.evolutionm.net/forums/sh...8&postcount=20

 

So with the P2e can I buy a map from Works and load it to my ECU from my laptop without pulling the ECU?

 

WORKS will still need the ECU as the EcuTek programming cannot be done without the proper hardware.

 

man, i wanna drop by this saturday, but i fergot i'm going to hawaii.... See you guys the following saturday! I just have to get my test pipe and I'm ready for a tune.

 

What's the advantage of the P2e over the P2? Does the ecutek software allow more tuning options than the base P2 flash?

 

I was under the impression that evo 9's HAD to use Ecutek.... I read it a while ago so my info might be wrong.. but I thinkt he p2e has boost control as well..?

 

I have the P2e flashed on my evo ix MR. my car pulls like a beast!.. they use their own module to control the boost...i love what i have now im boosting 1.5 bar all the way to the redline..big ups to WORKS MAN LOVE THEIR PRODUCTS!..and thanks to JAMIE for hooking it up!...i cant wait to get my O2 housing and the mr short trow shifter!...

-Amiel

 

any dyno numbers by any chance?

 

I dont have time to get it dynoed!..but im hoping aleast 290whp with 91 octane..
my current mods are weapon -r 3 inch dp, works rtp, espelir exhaust.

 

ah. Let me know if you ever get a chance to dyno, I'd like to see how the results are comparing with other tunes i'm seeing.

 

ill let you know!..

 

From the driver's standpoint, there is none The EcuTek interface is more programmer-friendly as it has pretty colors, etc... to look at instead of a screen full of numbers. The end result is the "same" irregardless of which software is used to program the ECU.

 

Jamie, do you have any dyno number for an Evo 9 with TBE (catless), works drop in filter and a p2 @ 21psi on 91 oct? I'm jus curious.

 

This is about as close as I can get right now: https://www.evolutionm.net/forums/sh...ighlight=WORKS

This was with the O2 housing and Aperture, but an HFC instead of the RTP. Also, this is probably with 20PSI on 91 octane. In the end, results should be similar.