Notices
General Engine Management / Tuning Forum Discuss general EMS tuning concepts that do not pertain to a specfic brand or product.

Why is it mbc>ebc

Old Feb 18, 2009 | 07:14 PM
  #1  
SevenSins's Avatar
Thread Starter
Newbie
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 94
Likes: 0
From: St. Paul
Why is it mbc>ebc

Why? Honest question. Coming from my STI and all the EBC's out there why does everyone in the EVO community use a MBC? With all of the reflashing with Opensource OpenEcu etc... it was always easier to control boost and keep it stable. Now outside factors such as temp and humidity did not play as nice with a EBC but pretty damn close. The MBC always scared away subaru guys because of the "unreliability" and boost spikes.

So what I'm basically asking is not how they work, rather what your guy's opinions are on what to use and maybe a short reason why YOU use what you use.

Thanks Guys and Gals....

P.S. Would you make the switch to EBC if it was proven???
Reply
Old Feb 18, 2009 | 07:45 PM
  #2  
Appauldd's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (22)
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 2,408
Likes: 7
From: Northern KY near Cincy
I switched from a Buschur MBC to an Apexi EBC becasue I like to tinker. I hated to have to stop and pop the hood to make an adjustment because of the change in weather. Also adding the EBC allows me to log boost much more easily. Then there is the "shift on the fly" from pump gas boost to race gas boost just by hitting a couple buttons. A final benefit is the ability to control spikes through the use of the EBC. You just have to make sure the solonoid is mounted in a place that does not see much engine heat.

I think most people will agree that the reliability of the likes of Halman for an MBC can't be beat in relation to cost vs. performance.
Reply
Old Feb 24, 2009 | 09:25 AM
  #3  
SevenSins's Avatar
Thread Starter
Newbie
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 94
Likes: 0
From: St. Paul
awesome input, any other thoughts out there? I agree with you about the tinkering, assuming optimal conditions I believe EBC can provide a "precise" measure
Reply
Old Feb 24, 2009 | 09:29 AM
  #4  
EmeryatSTM's Avatar
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (79)
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 2,340
Likes: 5
From: Rochester, NY
Originally Posted by SevenSins
awesome input, any other thoughts out there? I agree with you about the tinkering, assuming optimal conditions I believe EBC can provide a "precise" measure


Chances of a MBC failing are far less than an EBC. If one fails, depending on the way it is hooked up it can cause the car to over boost and ultimately blow your engine up.

Ever hear the expression "less is more"? Think of that every time you work on your car and I promise you, you will have less problems in the long run.


-Em
Reply
Old Feb 24, 2009 | 09:31 AM
  #5  
Curt@MrLed's Avatar
Former Vendor
iTrader: (107)
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 4,364
Likes: 0
From: A.K.A. DaFarmer
Im a lucky one who has been enjoying a hks evc2 since 03. Never had a problem with it. Boost spike is never over 1 psi past its setting.
Reply
Old Feb 24, 2009 | 09:54 AM
  #6  
tvbf1's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 1,218
Likes: 0
From: California
You know, I was wondering the same thing as well. I've always thought that EBC are more accurate, consistent, and reliable then MBC. I only see 2 advantages with MBC is weight and cost.

When other members ask for advice on a boost controller, 99% of the time, forum members would say some kind of MBC and I always wonder why.
Reply
Old Feb 24, 2009 | 12:08 PM
  #7  
baylorar's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 169
Likes: 0
From: San Diego, CA
ecu boost control > both
Reply
Old Feb 24, 2009 | 12:12 PM
  #8  
alex4nder's Avatar
Newbie
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 76
Likes: 1
From: Santa Barbara
Originally Posted by SevenSins
Would you make the switch to EBC if it was proven???
They are proven; cars going back to 80s Volvos have been using electronic boost control to manage the turbo. I think the problem for most tuners/mechanics is that EBCs are harder to understand, so they don't want to bother with setting them up properly. It's a lot easier to attach an MBC and call it a day.
Reply
Old Feb 24, 2009 | 12:47 PM
  #9  
Nurburgring's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (15)
 
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 112
Likes: 1
From: Santiago, Chile
On WRX/STIīs, electronic boost control is very simple, on the Evo itīs complex, and thatīs it.

Why more complex? because you either have to change the boost line restrictors or install a different wastegate solenoid to do stock-ECU-based boost control, learn to mod .xmlīs and fine tune in Ecuflash. Also a lot of people donīt feel comfortable with Load based boost control. And finally, you need a JDM or Evo X MAP sensor to log boost, a feature that is present in stock form in the subbies.

From my experience, the stock Subaru EBC is very simple to operate: Set Minimum Wastegate Duty, set Maximum Wastegate Duty, set Boost Target, and the ECU will do most the job. It doesnīt get any more simple than that.

If you do your homework, ECU based boost control in the Evo is just as effective as in the Subarus; itīs just a steeper learning curve.


You can shape your boost curve any way you want, thatīs the beauty of EBC vs MBC.




Reply
Old Feb 24, 2009 | 12:55 PM
  #10  
Go_Lancer_Go's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (13)
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 1,781
Likes: 1
From: Edmonton, Alberta CANADA
^^^ Great explanation!!!
Reply
Old Feb 24, 2009 | 01:12 PM
  #11  
casper980's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 912
Likes: 0
From: Michigan
MBC manual boost controller - cheap, allows you to set up a specific maximum boost level. good for mildly modified cars

EBC - Electronic boost controllers - they will offer you much more control over your turbo than a MBC. Some have the ability to set gear and rpm specific boost. The ability to log boost. in car adjustment of the turbo, you don't have to pull over, pop the hood, and turn a knob/screw. I am using the Autronic pnp board in my car to control boost, along with an AEM boost(wastegate) solenoid. It doesn't have all the features that the Autronic SM4 boards have, however it is quite capable, and has most of the above features, as well as the ability to cut injector input if you over boost. Which can be set up to cut after a given over-boost amount or length of time. This type of feature you will find in ECU based boost control. Recommended for higher horsepower vehicles, just because the engine should make more power with one.

Last edited by casper980; Feb 24, 2009 at 01:14 PM.
Reply
Old Feb 24, 2009 | 01:43 PM
  #12  
baylorar's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 169
Likes: 0
From: San Diego, CA
Originally Posted by Nurburgring
On WRX/STIīs, electronic boost control is very simple, on the Evo itīs complex, and thatīs it.

Why more complex? because you either have to change the boost line restrictors or install a different wastegate solenoid to do stock-ECU-based boost control, learn to mod .xmlīs and fine tune in Ecuflash. Also a lot of people donīt feel comfortable with Load based boost control. And finally, you need a JDM or Evo X MAP sensor to log boost, a feature that is present in stock form in the subbies.

From my experience, the stock Subaru EBC is very simple to operate: Set Minimum Wastegate Duty, set Maximum Wastegate Duty, set Boost Target, and the ECU will do most the job. It doesnīt get any more simple than that.

If you do your homework, ECU based boost control in the Evo is just as effective as in the Subarus; itīs just a steeper learning curve.


You can shape your boost curve any way you want, thatīs the beauty of EBC vs MBC.
I still think ECU based boost control is fairly easy to learn on the Evos. Modifying the ROM took 5 minutes... Modifying the .xml took another 5 minutes. Installing boost pill took 10 minutes. The only real drawback is that you need an EVO X or JDM map sensor. That's pretty kickass that the Subbies come with the sensor needed already.
Reply
Old Feb 24, 2009 | 01:49 PM
  #13  
Kracka's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (49)
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 8,970
Likes: 17
From: Prosper, TX
I had a MBC, switched to a ECU-controlled GM BCS/JDM MAP sensor setup, and now switched back to a MBC again. Overall, the MBC is easier, cheaper, and one less thing to hassle with. With the MBC boost seems to come on faster and harder, but it does taper more up top which I'm fine with for my setup.
Reply
Old Mar 5, 2009 | 11:22 AM
  #14  
TakaseEVOIXSE's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (20)
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 660
Likes: 0
From: houston
i ran a MBC at first since EVERYONE recommends it. Granted its a cheap easy solution. BUT when i switched to an EBC i never looked back. First w/ the Profec and now w/ an EVC... your boost response is SOOO much better w/ an EBC. Perhaps since its actually keeping the wastegate shut until the last second, i dunno... but on mine you can definately tell a huge difference in how it spools. W/ the MBC it was gradual... .w/ the EBCs it is straight up violent. Bam! So if you can afford it... i recommend going EBC for sure! plus the convenience is a plus!
Reply
Old Mar 6, 2009 | 12:52 AM
  #15  
genma's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 87
Likes: 0
From: Schofield Barracks, Hawaii
I'm currently using the Blitz SBCid and I simply love it. I have sampled various EBCs and the Blitz is hands down the best. I also have toyed with MBCs though there is simply no comparison, other than they both restrict the pressure seen by the wastegate. Yeah there is a fail probability though thats applies to everything.. What if???? The real reason people often opt for MBC over a EBC is the cost. You can control boost for as low as $7.00 for a gas valve from Home Depot.. or as much as $600.00 for name brand, EBC from a performance shop.
Reply

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -7. The time now is 08:21 PM.