Notices
Lancer Aftermarket Forced Induction Tech Discuss forced induction related specs and upgrades for custom aftermarket setups.

Ripp mods V.S. RRM

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 21, 2004 | 12:44 PM
  #1  
krnzzang84720's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolving Member
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 456
Likes: 0
From: Buffalo Grove, IL
Ripp mods V.S. RRM

Which do you guys think it's better?
Turbo or Supercharger
Old Oct 21, 2004 | 12:45 PM
  #2  
Delshay's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 64
Likes: 0
From: virginia beach va
Turbo!
Old Oct 21, 2004 | 12:45 PM
  #3  
krnzzang84720's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolving Member
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 456
Likes: 0
From: Buffalo Grove, IL
why??
Old Oct 21, 2004 | 12:51 PM
  #4  
twardnw's Avatar
Evolved Member
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Shutterbug
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 1,679
Likes: 0
From: Vancouver, WA
https://www.evolutionm.net/forums/evom-new-member-faqs-evom-rules/3532-attn-newbies-please-read-before-making-new-thread.html
Old Oct 21, 2004 | 12:57 PM
  #5  
twardnw's Avatar
Evolved Member
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Shutterbug
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 1,679
Likes: 0
From: Vancouver, WA
if you had searched, you would have found this poll:

https://www.evolutionm.net/forums/lancer-aftermarket-forced-induction-tech/4903-supercharge-turbo.html
Old Oct 21, 2004 | 02:57 PM
  #6  
Hotshot940's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 1,555
Likes: 0
From: Columbus, Ohio
this has been covered 18,000,000 times.
Old Oct 21, 2004 | 05:58 PM
  #7  
fkrzo's Avatar
Evolved Member
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 543
Likes: 0
From: Westchester, NY
I disagree, I love my supercharger.
Old Oct 21, 2004 | 06:05 PM
  #8  
Nm0ney34's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 252
Likes: 0
From: Cincinnati
if u want more reliability go SC u want more power, go TC
Old Oct 21, 2004 | 06:10 PM
  #9  
KUlancer's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 418
Likes: 0
From: Indiana
i want to disagree. Althought i have no problems with RRM this is my question... If the SC puts 252 down (auto) and the TC puts 200 down (auto) then how is it more power??? huh huh o rite!
Old Oct 21, 2004 | 06:15 PM
  #10  
liquidlancer's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (15)
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 745
Likes: 0
From: nj
holy crap someone should close this thread this might get out of control AGAIN!

you knwo what maybe ill super charge my car this time around just to put this damn thing to rest once and for all
Old Oct 21, 2004 | 06:28 PM
  #11  
Nm0ney34's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 252
Likes: 0
From: Cincinnati
Originally Posted by KUlancer
i want to disagree. Althought i have no problems with RRM this is my question... If the SC puts 252 down (auto) and the TC puts 200 down (auto) then how is it more power??? huh huh o rite!
I was speaking on other cars, not just the lancer, go ahead and disagree all u want...

BUT

While the SC can put down some #'s, The turbo can be tunned and boosted up to give better numbers on alot of cars, dont make me go into that. u show me a SC lancer putting down beter 1/4 mile times and 60' times beter than a TC than ill shut up.

If its puttin down 252 to the wheels in an AUTO, than would that make it a 14-13 sec car...post me some times plZZZZZZZZZZZ

im not knocking SC's, they will last longer in the long run i beileve. but turbos can be alot more powerful
Old Oct 21, 2004 | 06:37 PM
  #12  
KUlancer's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 418
Likes: 0
From: Indiana
like you said... Ur speakin in general... (if u think i was getting cocky with the Huh Huh o rite! part nah its from family guy...) sorry mister but i think ur dazed by RRM not that it is completely bad or ne thing....
Old Oct 21, 2004 | 06:59 PM
  #13  
Nm0ney34's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 252
Likes: 0
From: Cincinnati
lol how, im not even turboing my car...and if i was there are a hell of alot cheaper products. I actually think that 252 on an auto is amazing...I just want some numbers, i see a guy with the sds SC and hes runnin 15.6, not that thats terrible but I would expect alot more from that much power at the wheels.

Just read my post, I said SC are great for reliability, unlike the turbo where u can blow up in a few days, over boosting. And so far on our lancers turbo's are the ones making power AND TIMES.
Old Oct 21, 2004 | 07:50 PM
  #14  
03RallyLancer's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 1,595
Likes: 0
From: Redneck KY
sds is putting down about the same numbers as the tc lancers though... u have to compare boost levels when you compare hp figures... you cant say hey look im putting down 300 hp and boosting 17psi... and compare it to someone boosting 10 psi and only making 240, and say his setup is worse. if im wrong and the sds is putting down that much hp at low boost levels and the tc cars are putting down a lot less hp at the same levels my bad.
Old Oct 21, 2004 | 08:28 PM
  #15  
Nm0ney34's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 252
Likes: 0
From: Cincinnati
it doesnt matter at boost levels. u make power at whatever u tune it at. you cant go making excusses, well if you were only boosting 10psi like me I would win, if you can boost higher, more power to you, one of the ADVANTAGES of TC. ALL I AM TRYING TO SAY is that SC u have more reliability. TC u can have more power. I wasnt knocking anything at all.



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 02:48 AM.