Notices
Lancer Aftermarket Forced Induction Tech Discuss forced induction related specs and upgrades for custom aftermarket setups.

Dynod AUTO Lancer RIPP SDS KIT!!!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Feb 2, 2005 | 05:16 PM
  #16  
SIMSSEGA's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 686
Likes: 0
Sounds Great now we need he 1/4 mile
Reply
Old Feb 2, 2005 | 07:01 PM
  #17  
nextgenerationx's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 673
Likes: 0
From: New York!
Originally Posted by Punk8981
ow ok...how much were you boostin when you hit 197WHP? and also you gained more power when they changed ur injector frpm 310cc to 410cc does this mean that the kit is now gonna have the 410cc injectors from now on? so it'll add more power?
i'm runnin at 10psi
Reply
Old Feb 2, 2005 | 07:05 PM
  #18  
iyi0521's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 483
Likes: 0
From: Souderton PA
hey next please scan the dyno sheet if you can. Id like to do a comparison of the turbo and SDS stage one kits.
Reply
Old Feb 2, 2005 | 07:07 PM
  #19  
nextgenerationx's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 673
Likes: 0
From: New York!
i don't have a scanner the best i can do is take a pic. n this is a stage 2
Reply
Old Feb 2, 2005 | 07:15 PM
  #20  
Punk8981's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 181
Likes: 0
From: Chicago, IL
Originally Posted by nextgenerationx
i'm runnin at 10psi
if i can remember correctly L.'s set up (manual) was runnin at 11 PSI with 310cc injectors and ripp said it comes up to 222whp....but if you pulled 197 at 10PSI which is very close, i dont know how its possible to reach the 222whp mark....i guess well just have to wait till a manual stage 2 is dynoed. but a big on your efforts!

Last edited by Punk8981; Feb 2, 2005 at 07:18 PM.
Reply
Old Feb 2, 2005 | 07:22 PM
  #21  
nextgenerationx's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 673
Likes: 0
From: New York!
i'm auto, people should read my post carefully. besides that i'm auto i have a slipping tranny with a leak and also my sh!tty exaust system that does no good
Reply
Old Feb 2, 2005 | 07:26 PM
  #22  
gbwaacha's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 399
Likes: 0
From: Morris County, NJ
nice numbers man...look foward to another ride soon...keep up the good work
Reply
Old Feb 2, 2005 | 07:38 PM
  #23  
gbwaacha's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 399
Likes: 0
From: Morris County, NJ
the video is pretty tasty too....
Reply
Old Feb 2, 2005 | 07:48 PM
  #24  
Boeturbolancer's Avatar
EvoM Guru
iTrader: (26)
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 2,791
Likes: 1
From: Hemet, CA
Those are some good numbers next... glad you finally pushed for the dyno. The car has to feel 3million times better now then when you were at 130whp. I about dropped a load when i saw that number.

Which header do you have? Ripp's kit requires one right? If your still using your second cat dump that sucker for a good 5-10hp gain. Sucks about your tranny. The torque numbers are lower than i'd hoped but the SC and the auto account for that. Why don't you try 550's for you fuel if the 410's couldn't hang? They should give you plenty or were the 410's plenty enough for 10psi.

Your also running the methanol injection right? Did you ever notice what your egt's were? The higher rpms would definately gain you power since the sc would give you more and more boost with the rising rpms. The rod stroke is iffy for higher rpms under boost. I'd keep it under 7k if you find a way to raise it. Maybe ROSS can make a box that locks the rpm signal in at 6k until you reach the desired level you want. Shouldn't be to hard to make a rpm signal clamp.

Can't wait to see the full sheet scanned. That 130whp was to funny as i remember zoo racing a friend of RRM's(an eclipse) with that setup. Think that is when he blew it. You should give him a ride in the car now that your putting some real power down. What a huge difference you achieved. Good luck. Keep us posted as to changes in the kit due to your dyno visit.
Reply
Old Feb 2, 2005 | 07:53 PM
  #25  
nextgenerationx's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 673
Likes: 0
From: New York!
Originally Posted by Boeturbolancer
Those are some good numbers next... glad you finally pushed for the dyno. The car has to feel 3million times better now then when you were at 130whp. I about dropped a load when i saw that number.

Which header do you have? Ripp's kit requires one right? If your still using your second cat dump that sucker for a good 5-10hp gain. Sucks about your tranny. The torque numbers are lower than i'd hoped but the SC and the auto account for that. Why don't you try 550's for you fuel if the 410's couldn't hang? They should give you plenty or were the 410's plenty enough for 10psi.

Your also running the methanol injection right? Did you ever notice what your egt's were? The higher rpms would definately gain you power since the sc would give you more and more boost with the rising rpms. The rod stroke is iffy for higher rpms under boost. I'd keep it under 7k if you find a way to raise it. Maybe ROSS can make a box that locks the rpm signal in at 6k until you reach the desired level you want. Shouldn't be to hard to make a rpm signal clamp.

Can't wait to see the full sheet scanned. That 130whp was to funny as i remember zoo racing a friend of RRM's(an eclipse) with that setup. Think that is when he blew it. You should give him a ride in the car now that your putting some real power down. What a huge difference you achieved. Good luck. Keep us posted as to changes in the kit due to your dyno visit.
i can't believe what i just read a complent from boe? can this be? i had 310 injectors now i have 440 in them now. so boe what ya think about the curve? i really need to raise my rev limiter for some more power.. unleash the fury!! haha too bad rrm doesn't have that ecu flash anymore that raised the rpm limter to 6900
Reply
Old Feb 2, 2005 | 07:55 PM
  #26  
GreenPsycho's Avatar
Account Disabled
iTrader: (13)
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 1,555
Likes: 1
From: Kansas Now/Louisiana/Connecticut
i believe he has a gen1 kamikaze header and dp combo. yes, ripp does recquire one to boost safely, something about stock headers not getting rid of excess heat or something.
Reply
Old Feb 2, 2005 | 07:56 PM
  #27  
nextgenerationx's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 673
Likes: 0
From: New York!
yea i do have the 1st gen header from kamikazi. pos hangs way to ***en low.. causing my cat to hang low.. stupid header
Reply
Old Feb 2, 2005 | 08:06 PM
  #28  
Boeturbolancer's Avatar
EvoM Guru
iTrader: (26)
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 2,791
Likes: 1
From: Hemet, CA
Man i totally missed the answers to most of my ??'s in your post... i'm spacing it.

Good hp numbers197 is great for an auto... in comparison to RRM's kit about a 30whp difference isn't to bad. The torque is just not there though. 177 for RIPP compared to about 215+ for RRMs is a little bit to big of a difference. At almost 40ftlbs the RRM kit should out pull the SC. Hopefully you can get to the track and put up some impressive numbers. The torque drop could be due to that tranny issue you described so a track session would show a lot better detail. Good numbers though and nice car by the way. Looks well kept in the picture.
Reply
Old Feb 2, 2005 | 08:08 PM
  #29  
Boeturbolancer's Avatar
EvoM Guru
iTrader: (26)
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 2,791
Likes: 1
From: Hemet, CA
Originally Posted by nextgenerationx
i can't believe what i just read a complent from boe? can this be? i had 310 injectors now i have 440 in them now. so boe what ya think about the curve? i really need to raise my rev limiter for some more power.. unleash the fury!! haha too bad rrm doesn't have that ecu flash anymore that raised the rpm limter to 6900
The curve is very linear and represents the SC well. It is very predictible and was right were i expected it to be.
Reply
Old Feb 2, 2005 | 08:13 PM
  #30  
nextgenerationx's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 673
Likes: 0
From: New York!
yea i keep the car very very clean. i'm **** about it when it becomes dirty. but since we got a blizzard like 2 weeks ago and theres still so much snow on my driveway and its freezing i don't feel like washing it and i refuse to go to a car wash.
but anyways i'll try to get to the track when spring comes but to tell ya the truth i'm not about the track. i'm more of road handling. but theres no harm in gettin timed right so i guess y not. the launch is gonna be horrible due to my tranny problem tho. but well see
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 06:44 AM.