Notices
Lancer Aftermarket Forced Induction Tech Discuss forced induction related specs and upgrades for custom aftermarket setups.

RRM Stage 2 Automatic Result

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Sep 15, 2005 | 12:54 PM
  #16  
OZLancer1's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 628
Likes: 0
From: York, PA
I've been meaning to get mine on a dyno, but I need to get a new clutch first since the #'s would be way off with the way my clutch slips now. Those numbers are awesome though! Gives me hope for when I run mine!
Reply
Old Sep 15, 2005 | 01:46 PM
  #17  
SLVROZ_03's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 4,796
Likes: 0
From: Greenville, SC
Auto Lancers, represent...
Reply
Old Sep 15, 2005 | 02:35 PM
  #18  
initialDRacer's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 595
Likes: 0
From: Springfield, VA
Originally Posted by dhonda
Thats awesome. Does that include the Intercooler?
Of course it does! anything above 5psi is not recommended non-intercooled
Reply
Old Sep 15, 2005 | 03:36 PM
  #19  
4g94T's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (18)
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 2,069
Likes: 0
From: California
looks like he's having too much fun to come back to the forum
Reply
Old Sep 15, 2005 | 06:15 PM
  #20  
ROCK's Avatar
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (67)
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 7,826
Likes: 3
From: Santa Fe Springs, CA.
He is shy. That is why he never posted his results before.

ROAD/RACE
Reply
Old Sep 15, 2005 | 06:53 PM
  #21  
silentmunky's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 151
Likes: 0
From: Toney, Alabama
what would the stage 2 turbo knock your mpg to? but if you can afford the kit, you should have no prob affording the gas.
Reply
Old Sep 15, 2005 | 08:06 PM
  #22  
ROCK's Avatar
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (67)
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 7,826
Likes: 3
From: Santa Fe Springs, CA.
Mileage is a little worse but if you keep your foot out of it you can conserve rather nicely.

ROAD/RACE
Reply
Old Sep 15, 2005 | 08:48 PM
  #23  
Boeturbolancer's Avatar
EvoM Guru
iTrader: (26)
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 2,791
Likes: 1
From: Hemet, CA
Guru was getting about 30mpg back and forth to his work... 60+ miles one way every day.

He did say though that having a heavy foot on the highway basically yeilded the same mileage that he used to get in town driving. Other than that it wasn't really bad at all.
Reply
Old Sep 15, 2005 | 09:43 PM
  #24  
silentmunky's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 151
Likes: 0
From: Toney, Alabama
thats nice to hear. i was always thinking of doing a turbo, but, due to $$, had the only option of an auto lancer. and i am used to manuals, so i was thrown off really bad. so im saving for a torqe convertor, and was thinking of a FI system. supercharged had crossed my mind, then i saw the 249whp, and i changed my mind. dont lancers put down 97-95 stock? thats a huge increase. and if the mileage is the same, or close, super good idea. nicely done rabbit61319, auto's represent
Reply
Old Sep 15, 2005 | 10:40 PM
  #25  
thereasonsf3's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 747
Likes: 0
From: Houston, Tx
so you should be able to beat stock dodge srt-4, evo's and sti's from a roll. and even hang with some of the older corvets. and what not. all from a roll though. cause our traction sucks. and you cant lauch with an auto.
Reply
Old Sep 15, 2005 | 10:42 PM
  #26  
thereasonsf3's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 747
Likes: 0
From: Houston, Tx
isnt a lancer peak HP around 5500 rppm's? if thats the case i see why his hp jumped up. thats the only reason i can think of for that spike in the chart.
Reply
Old Sep 16, 2005 | 01:31 AM
  #27  
Boni's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 411
Likes: 0
From: Ontario, CA.
christ almighty
Reply
Old Sep 16, 2005 | 09:29 AM
  #28  
ROCK's Avatar
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (67)
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 7,826
Likes: 3
From: Santa Fe Springs, CA.
Wow. I rmember Guru did commute pretty far and told me about getting good mileage.

ROAD/RACE
Reply
Old Sep 16, 2005 | 09:40 AM
  #29  
initialDRacer's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 595
Likes: 0
From: Springfield, VA
compared to SC, turbo has better gas mileage because SC is constantly on boost when the crank is spinning...even when it's idle! Correct me if I'm wrong but that's how I see it...
Reply
Old Sep 16, 2005 | 09:47 AM
  #30  
ROCK's Avatar
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (67)
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 7,826
Likes: 3
From: Santa Fe Springs, CA.
Not sure but that nakes some sense.

ROAD/RACE
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 12:56 AM.