Turbo or N/a?
okay guys, thanks for all the info.
Looks like im gonna stay N/A... No point of throwing away warranty.. i never planned on selling this car btw.. when i said i want to buy a used S2000, i want that to be my track car and the lancer as my winter beater.
i like N/A because its smooth. I hate cars that clutch so tough. i love the clutch on my stock lancer and i dont want to ***** with it. Plus i spank enough higher end cars already.
From a degree of 1-10 how much gains do these parts produce:
Camshafts
flywheel
flash
Looks like im gonna stay N/A... No point of throwing away warranty.. i never planned on selling this car btw.. when i said i want to buy a used S2000, i want that to be my track car and the lancer as my winter beater.
i like N/A because its smooth. I hate cars that clutch so tough. i love the clutch on my stock lancer and i dont want to ***** with it. Plus i spank enough higher end cars already.
From a degree of 1-10 how much gains do these parts produce:
Camshafts
flywheel
flash
Since nobody makes camshafts for the Lancer, there's no way to tell what the gains will be. Generally the more gains, the rougher the camshaft (meaning shaky idle, requirement of supporting mods, etc). A flywheel is a waste of time since it offers no power gains. A flash can add a decent amount of power but it won't work miracles.
Since nobody makes camshafts for the Lancer, there's no way to tell what the gains will be. Generally the more gains, the rougher the camshaft (meaning shaky idle, requirement of supporting mods, etc). A flywheel is a waste of time since it offers no power gains. A flash can add a decent amount of power but it won't work miracles.
how is it that we cant have the power of an S200? i know the s2k is a 2.0L just like the lancer but why cant we build up internals and other things and have near/close to as much HP/power as the s2k.
also why is it that the s2k has dual exhaust and its only a 2.0L like the lancer? why would we have backpressure problems and they wont, because duals comes stock
also why is it that the s2k has dual exhaust and its only a 2.0L like the lancer? why would we have backpressure problems and they wont, because duals comes stock
cuz no one makes internals for our lancers..ur talkin 2.0L im talkin 2.4L (09) same **** tho..PLUS s2k is a rear wheel SPORTS CAR underline it SPOOORTS CAAAR (not to mention with 11k redline) lancer is economy, aka go to the store to pick up ur woman some tampons..not saying its not capable, jus wasnt designed for that purpose
how is it that we cant have the power of an S200? i know the s2k is a 2.0L just like the lancer but why cant we build up internals and other things and have near/close to as much HP/power as the s2k.
also why is it that the s2k has dual exhaust and its only a 2.0L like the lancer? why would we have backpressure problems and they wont, because duals comes stock
also why is it that the s2k has dual exhaust and its only a 2.0L like the lancer? why would we have backpressure problems and they wont, because duals comes stock
HP is a product of RPM and torque. The S2000 can rev to what, 9000 RPM? Some are getting over the 10000 RPM barrier. The Lancer redlines at 6500 RPM? You simply cannot get high HP out of a low displacement motor without revving high. The F20 is a completely different machine, you cannot compare them.
You're comparing two completely different motors. Just because they're the same displacement doesn't mean they're going to behave the same. As an obvious example, you can have two containers that both hold 2.0 Ls but how they're designed has a dramatic effect on how well they can flow. If the S2000 is flowing a crap load more air, backpressure isn't an issue. Since it revs to the stratosphere, it needs to be very open since while it may lose some low-end grunt, it gains a lot of high RPM power.
You're comparing two completely different motors. Just because they're the same displacement doesn't mean they're going to behave the same. As an obvious example, you can have two containers that both hold 2.0 Ls but how they're designed has a dramatic effect on how well they can flow. If the S2000 is flowing a crap load more air, backpressure isn't an issue. Since it revs to the stratosphere, it needs to be very open since while it may lose some low-end grunt, it gains a lot of high RPM power.
or can we just nobody has made the right parts yet
Honda engineered the engine to perform like that
so in theory there are internals already
If you want a high revving, high HP NA motor, buy a Honda. It would cost you more money to make your motor behave like the F20 than it would to just buy an S2000. Even with upgraded internals, you're not going to go from 6500 RPM to 10000 RPM.
if were talkin 09 GTS 2.4L...then no...2.0L's? ya theyre interchangable, but everything was design for a motor that is boosted..its different specs if ur n/a, ull run like **** or even worse do permanent damage


