Notices
Lancer Engine Tech Discuss specs/changes to the engine from cams to fully balanced and blueprinted engines!

RRM CamShaft & RRM Pulleys

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 27, 2006 | 06:54 AM
  #1  
Devas's Avatar
Thread Starter
Newbie
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 81
Likes: 0
RRM CamShaft & RRM Pulleys

Lets be straight up, What are the likely gains? (With PIGGY V2)
Reply
Old Oct 27, 2006 | 07:02 AM
  #2  
Blacksheepdj's Avatar
EvoM Staff Alumni
iTrader: (88)
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 8,733
Likes: 3
From: Concord Township, Ohio
What do you want to hear? Do you want a number? Do you want a dyno chart? Only noobs go "what are the gains?" with no indication of what information they're looking for. Are you a HP-***** who only cares about the peak HP number? Are you a "room under the curve" guy who's interested in how the mods affect the entire power curve?

Help us out a bit...
Reply
Old Oct 27, 2006 | 07:14 AM
  #3  
Devas's Avatar
Thread Starter
Newbie
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 81
Likes: 0
Sorry for the lack of information. Im actually a 1/4 ***** if such a thing, however I dont know how to ask for that, right now my 1/4 is 16.42 (Dynoed by Gtech). How much lower will it go?
Reply
Old Oct 27, 2006 | 07:18 AM
  #4  
Shingen's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 1,679
Likes: 0
From: Northern VA
The best times for any lancer I've seen are in the high 14's low 15's. So by putting these mods on you're not going to see all that much lower than that with just a camshaft and pulley. I'd also look into RPW camshafts as there are more for different applications. RRM only has one for both N/A and FI...

Fox
Reply
Old Oct 27, 2006 | 07:30 AM
  #5  
Blacksheepdj's Avatar
EvoM Staff Alumni
iTrader: (88)
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 8,733
Likes: 3
From: Concord Township, Ohio
To be honest, it's very hard to say. They're so new, I don't know if anyone has done much testing. I know it'll make you quicker, but it's hard to say how much. And RRM isn't really interested in product testing (since people complain whether you do or not).

With such a new part, it's just a question without an answer. Sorry.
Reply
Old Oct 27, 2006 | 07:34 AM
  #6  
Devas's Avatar
Thread Starter
Newbie
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 81
Likes: 0
I rather the RRM, because with RPW Cams, it might roughen by idle. Also right now im at 16.42, which is a lot slower then the "the bests times" you've seen. Now im guessing its a lot easier to gain some time at a higher range, then at a lower range correct? So would I see a .1-.3 reduction in my 1/4?
Reply
Old Oct 27, 2006 | 07:47 AM
  #7  
Shingen's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 1,679
Likes: 0
From: Northern VA
Originally Posted by Blacksheepdj
To be honest, it's very hard to say. They're so new, I don't know if anyone has done much testing. I know it'll make you quicker, but it's hard to say how much. And RRM isn't really interested in product testing (since people complain whether you do or not).

With such a new part, it's just a question without an answer. Sorry.
That's logical. Actually that's the stupidest stance on testing I've ever heard of from a company. Damned if you do, damned if you don't. With such a massive N/A undertaking such as a cam, you'd think they'd be all over dyno tests. Showcasing what it gained over base application... a before and after if you will. You can't dispute nothing I suppose. And I think that's the real reason they don't post up dyno numbers. So if someone goes to the dyno with one of the cams and finds out that the gain wasn't as substantial as they thought then RRM can come right back and say, "well it must be something with your car or one of your other mods."

Conversly I truely understand RRM's delima in that the customer can turn right back and say, "well I didn't get the results you posted in your dyno therefore I want a refund" or "you guys lied." Simple way around that is a disclaimer statement when buying aftermarket products, such as, "performance gains will vary." Just tell us what's been done to the test car as far as mods before and after and then dyno the thing.

Sorry I'm in a ranting mood.

All that said I don't and many others don't trust a cam that is both for N/A and F/I... it doesn't make sense. While it might be safe for both, that doesn't speak to end gains, espically if you aren't willing to post said gains for all to see. It would be good to see companies truely back their products by some dyno sheets. But at the end of the day all we will get from them is, "we allow our customers to dyno and that's good enough for us."

BTW, does anyone have the RRM cam? I'd be interested to see what the gains are. Same goes for the RPW. I recall reading about someone having the RPW.

Fox
Reply
Old Oct 27, 2006 | 08:17 AM
  #8  
Devas's Avatar
Thread Starter
Newbie
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 81
Likes: 0
Hmm this seems very unpromising for the price im going to be paying, i think i'll wait until some proof comes out, before i make these purchases.
Reply
Old Oct 27, 2006 | 09:54 AM
  #9  
Blacksheepdj's Avatar
EvoM Staff Alumni
iTrader: (88)
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 8,733
Likes: 3
From: Concord Township, Ohio
RRM's stand is simple - we make stuff, we have a legion of fans, we don't have to test.

Granted, that's not exactly how they advertise it. But it's implied.
Reply
Old Oct 27, 2006 | 03:03 PM
  #10  
Dave@Accolade's Avatar
Account Disabled
iTrader: (96)
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 1,842
Likes: 0
From: ACCOLADE
Originally Posted by Blacksheepdj
RRM's stand is simple - we make stuff, we have a legion of fans, we don't have to test.

Granted, that's not exactly how they advertise it. But it's implied.
its interesting but I have PMs from an RRM employee who owns a lancer asking me for prices on the RPW CamShafts, obviously he must know which is best..
Reply
Old Oct 27, 2006 | 03:22 PM
  #11  
ambystom01's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 15,634
Likes: 75
From: Canuckistan
The word "best" is very subjective. If you just want a slight increase in performance without any idle problems, need for an aftermarket cam gear, relatively low price, etc. RRM is the way to go. RPW cams are great, but they also have issues. People have complained about a lumpy idle and loss of power in the lower RPM ranges. There is no one cam that will be the best for everyone's needs or applications.
Reply
Old Oct 28, 2006 | 04:39 AM
  #12  
my-lancer's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 180
Likes: 1
From: Chicago
Here's an idea, buy a RPW cam shaft, put it on, if you don't like, we'll buy it from you for a cheaper price to take it off your hands.lol

But Amby is right. Best thing to do is wait or search to see if anybody's bought one.
Reply
Old Oct 28, 2006 | 05:51 AM
  #13  
02OZR's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 216
Likes: 0
From: Tennessee
I'm waiting to install my RRM Cam, so we'll see. I'll have a full review of everything in a few weeks.
Reply
Old Oct 28, 2006 | 07:02 AM
  #14  
Blacksheepdj's Avatar
EvoM Staff Alumni
iTrader: (88)
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 8,733
Likes: 3
From: Concord Township, Ohio
Originally Posted by Dave@Accolade
its interesting but I have PMs from an RRM employee who owns a lancer asking me for prices on the RPW CamShafts, obviously he must know which is best..
Pride go before the fall, Dave.
Reply
Old Nov 22, 2006 | 08:07 AM
  #15  
SuperPork's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 8
Likes: 0
From: VT
Is there any hard numbers or dyno runs just so we can get a rough guestimate?
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 09:12 AM.