Horsepower gains
C'mon now! Be a little more optimistic sdhotwn. 
Buschur Racing dyno'd their intake, testpipe, and catback, I believe, and it gained 8 whp. Granted, your point is still valid about a catback providing the real hp gains compared to an axleback, but I would be willing to go out on a limb and say an axleback provides at least 2-3 whp.

Buschur Racing dyno'd their intake, testpipe, and catback, I believe, and it gained 8 whp. Granted, your point is still valid about a catback providing the real hp gains compared to an axleback, but I would be willing to go out on a limb and say an axleback provides at least 2-3 whp.
I guess typically people are concerned about gains because they want to race or compete or something... therefore I always estimate conservative unless there are dyno results to say otherwise.
The Buschur thing I think was with the intake and the catback etc... but yeah they got 8 hp... so I guess you may be right on the 2-3... but I'll stay nearer to two
Later!.
The Buschur thing I think was with the intake and the catback etc... but yeah they got 8 hp... so I guess you may be right on the 2-3... but I'll stay nearer to two

Later!.
Yeah but the money to HP ratio is just horrible!!!!!!!!!
10Testpipe 50
2)Catback 375
3) Intake 160
Thats 585 bones for 8hp at the wheel...no offense anyone but that is just absurd. Thats about 73 per hp!!!!! Think about it guys!!!
10Testpipe 50
2)Catback 375
3) Intake 160
Thats 585 bones for 8hp at the wheel...no offense anyone but that is just absurd. Thats about 73 per hp!!!!! Think about it guys!!!
On a 4 cylinder... anything under 100 per horse is somewhat reasonable in the long run... just is the way it goes... Turbos run about 4.5G's intercooled and you are probably talking 80 horse... so about 56 dollars per horse.
Maybe I'm just wrong in thinking that 100 per horse is reasonable for a 4 cylinder. this isn't a 6 cyl or an 8 cyle where horsepower doesn't cost much...
How much horse did you get out of your eclipse? and how much money did you spend? Also keep in mind that upgrading a Lancer is just plain expensive because the parts aren't common like a Honda or anything. Also keep in mind that if it is your hobby and something you do for fun... then there isn't really a price... i know people that blow a 100 bucks in a night easy out drinking... 100 bucks per buzz?!? howz that?
Later.
Maybe I'm just wrong in thinking that 100 per horse is reasonable for a 4 cylinder. this isn't a 6 cyl or an 8 cyle where horsepower doesn't cost much...
How much horse did you get out of your eclipse? and how much money did you spend? Also keep in mind that upgrading a Lancer is just plain expensive because the parts aren't common like a Honda or anything. Also keep in mind that if it is your hobby and something you do for fun... then there isn't really a price... i know people that blow a 100 bucks in a night easy out drinking... 100 bucks per buzz?!? howz that?
Later.
Originally posted by sdhotwn
On a 4 cylinder... anything under 100 per horse is somewhat reasonable in the long run... just is the way it goes... Turbos run about 4.5G's intercooled and you are probably talking 80 horse... so about 56 dollars per horse.
Maybe I'm just wrong in thinking that 100 per horse is reasonable for a 4 cylinder. this isn't a 6 cyl or an 8 cyle where horsepower doesn't cost much...
How much horse did you get out of your eclipse? and how much money did you spend? Also keep in mind that upgrading a Lancer is just plain expensive because the parts aren't common like a Honda or anything. Also keep in mind that if it is your hobby and something you do for fun... then there isn't really a price... i know people that blow a 100 bucks in a night easy out drinking... 100 bucks per buzz?!? howz that?
Later.
On a 4 cylinder... anything under 100 per horse is somewhat reasonable in the long run... just is the way it goes... Turbos run about 4.5G's intercooled and you are probably talking 80 horse... so about 56 dollars per horse.
Maybe I'm just wrong in thinking that 100 per horse is reasonable for a 4 cylinder. this isn't a 6 cyl or an 8 cyle where horsepower doesn't cost much...
How much horse did you get out of your eclipse? and how much money did you spend? Also keep in mind that upgrading a Lancer is just plain expensive because the parts aren't common like a Honda or anything. Also keep in mind that if it is your hobby and something you do for fun... then there isn't really a price... i know people that blow a 100 bucks in a night easy out drinking... 100 bucks per buzz?!? howz that?
Later.
Also to note that the ratios change the farther you are along your upgrade path. My turbo supports up to 350 hp but I am by no means near this. I need a few more things like bigger injectors AFC, bigger fuel pump (current pump is rewired), down pipe, test pipe or high flow cat just to name a few things. I could also use some porting. But the case still stands what you pay per horse power, I will always pay way less for gains than what you pay. The same goes for bigger 6 and 8 cyclinder N/A engines. They may have alot of room to grow over a 4 banger but F/I is always going to be cheaper upgrading when built F/I from the factory.
Yeah, but the point is that comparing gains on an NA setup versus a turbo setup is an apples vs oranges debate. There's no sense comparing the two because any gains are obviously felt greater when you've got forced induction in play.
Originally posted by ghostrider
Yeah, but the point is that comparing gains on an NA setup versus a turbo setup is an apples vs oranges debate. There's no sense comparing the two because any gains are obviously felt greater when you've got forced induction in play.
Yeah, but the point is that comparing gains on an NA setup versus a turbo setup is an apples vs oranges debate. There's no sense comparing the two because any gains are obviously felt greater when you've got forced induction in play.
Originally posted by sdhotwn
Umm... as far as I know it is not possible to lose torque from an intake... i could be wrong... but it does not change the back pressure for the engine in the least which is what is critical to torque.
Umm... as far as I know it is not possible to lose torque from an intake... i could be wrong... but it does not change the back pressure for the engine in the least which is what is critical to torque.
And btw, there are quite a few exhausts available for our Lancers, now. everything from ebay $hit to Greddy.
i hear their is a gain but they dont make a full exhaust for the lancer or do they probably custom built!!!
Originally posted by mobius97
Yeah but "the point was" as you put it, we were comparing cost not gains. I just said that much money for that much horsepower is absurd, from my viewpoint.
Yeah but "the point was" as you put it, we were comparing cost not gains. I just said that much money for that much horsepower is absurd, from my viewpoint.
Originally posted by Pboccia
This is mostly a general question, but what are the average horsepower gains from adding a short ram intake, axle-back exhaust, and a test pipe to a US Lancer?
This is mostly a general question, but what are the average horsepower gains from adding a short ram intake, axle-back exhaust, and a test pipe to a US Lancer?
Originally posted by kbadboy
i meant a full exhaust system with all the piping! tahnks though i ma going to probably go with the greddy!
i meant a full exhaust system with all the piping! tahnks though i ma going to probably go with the greddy!
Unless you want something with headers and a cat too



