Notices
Lancer Engine Tech Discuss specs/changes to the engine from cams to fully balanced and blueprinted engines!

CAI Vs. SRI?!?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old May 19, 2009 | 10:58 PM
  #1  
roydollabill's Avatar
Thread Starter
Newbie
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 70
Likes: 0
From: nj
Question CAI Vs. SRI?!?

Hey Im planning on getting a new intake but not sure what to get. People are telling me that a SRI isnt worth it because it just sucks warm air, and people are telling me if I have a CAI I can accidently suck up water and get it in my engine.. I really dont know what to get, can people please post their opinions on what they really think is best or even better?
Reply
Old May 20, 2009 | 12:22 AM
  #2  
cRc`22's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 579
Likes: 0
From: California.925
you can do a search theirs like 50 topics just like this already with answers and opinions
Reply
Old May 20, 2009 | 04:36 AM
  #3  
StateOfTheArt's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 67
Likes: 0
From: Warminster, PA
A co-worker of mine is a aircraft engine mechanic, I on the other hand am a aircraft electronics technician so we had a debate on which is better. In a nutshell, especially in a turbo car, the few degree temperature difference you get between a CAI to a SRI is nominal, and the gains from a CAI are negated by the heat generated by the turbo itself. It is pretty much based on what the MAF is reading and telling the car.

I assume in a n/a car the difference can be a little different considering there aren't any other heat generating sources in the engine bay other than the engine itself.

Last edited by StateOfTheArt; May 20, 2009 at 04:41 AM.
Reply
Old May 20, 2009 | 05:04 AM
  #4  
EngRWW33's Avatar
Evolved Member
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 705
Likes: 1
From: Pittsburgh
Originally Posted by crc`22
you can do a search theirs like 50 topics just like this already with answers and opinions
this!!
Reply




All times are GMT -7. The time now is 01:52 AM.