Is it possible to make an all motor lancer beat a stock mustang?
Essentially what you are describing is a car that is too much for that driver to handle! If you know how to handle the power and ease the clutch and acceleration equally, you get a smooth slide out of corners, rather then sliding the *** end around like a fish tail. That is from the movies as mentioned before. It is all about the driver. No way, a Lancer will out handle a Mustang will equally high caliber drivers! Just ain't gonna happen, and I still don't know why we are even still discussing this issue. It is a mute issue, and will never be a issue or a close comparison!
Last edited by ShadowES; Oct 22, 2009 at 06:31 AM.
true and id change my name if i where him. but either way. im sure who ever he has in mind was a douche to him when he had his last car. altho if i was going for big game like that on the track or striaght aways id have gotten a 2009 ralliart and called it quits after a few mods.
You're assuming that the OP is a good driver which I'm highly doubtful of. If someone has the name stanghunter, 9 times out of 10, they're under the age of 20 and have zero racing experience.
First off, that's a 98. Second, if you're running 400 HP through the rear wheels, it will be a handful. Since I doubt you're a professional driver, that probably explains the "poor handling" which is actually poor driving. A new Mustang would absolutely kill a Lancer.
how would you call me a bad driver?? ive been in the 07 shelby gt500 with the traction control and everything **** wasnt able to take corners at all bud.
With statements like this do you really need me to clarify why I said you probably weren't a professional driver?
i dont think mustangs are good at all taking corners..thats why i made the comment about bad handling earlier, while it technically might not be bad handling as amby said its how the car is.. what i personally consider a better handling car is something i feel more comfortable taking a corner with.. and id feel much better taking it in a lancer than in a mustang.. even tho im not into muscle cars id probably daily one if the handling was more what i would want.
What you consider to be a better handling car is not technically right though, in qualified hands, a Mustang is a decent handling vehicle. I suspect the reason why a Lancer feels more confident is because it's FWD, it understeers and it doesn't snap the tail around when you're on the throttle mid-corner. That doesn't made for a good performer and a lot of people intentionally mod their car to act more like a Mustang (rear sway bar, increasing the rear spring rate, both intended to make the rear livelier).
Here are the stats for a Mustang GT vs a Lancer GTS according to Road & Track.
Mustang
1/4 mile: 13.8@104.0 MPH
0-60 MPH: 5.3 seconds
Braking from 60 MPH: 115 ft
Skidpad: 0.93 g
Slalom: 69.1 MPH
Lancer
1/4 mile: 16.5@86.0 MPH
0-60 MPH: 8.5 seconds
Braking from 60 MPH: 126 ft
Skidpad: 0.82 g
Slalom: 64.7 MPH
Based on that, the Mustang seems to be a pretty clear winner in terms of power, handling, braking, etc.
Here are the stats for a Mustang GT vs a Lancer GTS according to Road & Track.
Mustang
1/4 mile: 13.8@104.0 MPH
0-60 MPH: 5.3 seconds
Braking from 60 MPH: 115 ft
Skidpad: 0.93 g
Slalom: 69.1 MPH
Lancer
1/4 mile: 16.5@86.0 MPH
0-60 MPH: 8.5 seconds
Braking from 60 MPH: 126 ft
Skidpad: 0.82 g
Slalom: 64.7 MPH
Based on that, the Mustang seems to be a pretty clear winner in terms of power, handling, braking, etc.
What you consider to be a better handling car is not technically right though, in qualified hands, a Mustang is a decent handling vehicle. I suspect the reason why a Lancer feels more confident is because it's FWD, it understeers and it doesn't snap the tail around when you're on the throttle mid-corner. That doesn't made for a good performer and a lot of people intentionally mod their car to act more like a Mustang (rear sway bar, increasing the rear spring rate, both intended to make the rear livelier).
Here are the stats for a Mustang GT vs a Lancer GTS according to Road & Track.
Mustang
1/4 mile: 13.8@104.0 MPH
0-60 MPH: 5.3 seconds
Braking from 60 MPH: 115 ft
Skidpad: 0.93 g
Slalom: 69.1 MPH
Lancer
1/4 mile: 16.5@86.0 MPH
0-60 MPH: 8.5 seconds
Braking from 60 MPH: 126 ft
Skidpad: 0.82 g
Slalom: 64.7 MPH
Based on that, the Mustang seems to be a pretty clear winner in terms of power, handling, braking, etc.
Here are the stats for a Mustang GT vs a Lancer GTS according to Road & Track.
Mustang
1/4 mile: 13.8@104.0 MPH
0-60 MPH: 5.3 seconds
Braking from 60 MPH: 115 ft
Skidpad: 0.93 g
Slalom: 69.1 MPH
Lancer
1/4 mile: 16.5@86.0 MPH
0-60 MPH: 8.5 seconds
Braking from 60 MPH: 126 ft
Skidpad: 0.82 g
Slalom: 64.7 MPH
Based on that, the Mustang seems to be a pretty clear winner in terms of power, handling, braking, etc.
now that i agree with. i know that i could take a less experienced driver on some back roads. but thats anyone tho. but with what i feel with the new lancer vs the old one i could run a stang drive now. but i havent raced with this car i have a kid now so (as we talked about in pm) i dont do as i use to 2-3 years ago.
I'm sure there are faster Mustang times as well. Look at the trap speeds, they're very different. Once the Mustang is moving, it kills the Lancer. The Mustang has a 0-100 MPH time of 12.7 seconds, the Lancer, 24.1 seconds, almost double. The Mustang would absolutely blow the Lancer's doors off.
lol i feel like this is like a midget trying to run faster than someone of average height.... sure they can train a **** load and maybe beat them... but seriously? whats the point.
they are different people just like these are different cars.
lancer has a 4cycl engine mustangs have v6 or v8s ....
if the OP wanted to beat mustangs NA in an asian import... should have bought a little honda. lol 91 CRX FTW!!!
they are different people just like these are different cars.
lancer has a 4cycl engine mustangs have v6 or v8s ....
if the OP wanted to beat mustangs NA in an asian import... should have bought a little honda. lol 91 CRX FTW!!!
I'm sure there are faster Mustang times as well. Look at the trap speeds, they're very different. Once the Mustang is moving, it kills the Lancer. The Mustang has a 0-100 MPH time of 12.7 seconds, the Lancer, 24.1 seconds, almost double. The Mustang would absolutely blow the Lancer's doors off.
and you know the funny thing is ppl in a mazda3, honda civic EX, hhr, and focus' if they have exhaust and an intake think they can outrun you,lol.


