I love it when people dont get jokes :P

 

Best I've seen on my car is 6.0L/100km (Canadian Lancer)

 

I get about 19, but then again I'm one of those douche bags who sprint from a red light even tho I have to stop at the next light lol.

 

Wow the best I've gotten on highway avg with a 2.4 is 27. I usually run 23.5 mixed

 

Pure city mileage 20-25mpg... i don't count it cause frankly... gas prices are depressing enough as it is that i don't want to see a consistent sub- 30 mpg fuel economy figure. But im ok with that... cause i didnt buy this cvar with fuel economy on the top of my list.

 

i call bull****. picture or never happened

 

I don't - I get similar mileage. 2.0 litre engine. The 2.4 is going to be somewhat lower.

 

Yup that's around my mpg too. Highway is about 26-32 mpg straight highway and cruise control sometimes lowers the mpg too.
Is yours 5 speed or auto?

is that what the little computer in the middle of the cluster said? Because if so don't always believe it cause they lie and number's change drastically. But then again I see you drive a ES which would make that a smaller engine,I think.

LoL you too. I just have to do it in standard cause auto driver's accelerate way to slow and late here in Texas.

The best highway I've had is 32mpg and that was doing 65ish on I-10 going to Houston from my city San Antonio.
In the city I run about 24ish to 28ish just depends on time of year and traffic. It helps that my car JUST hit 900 mile's on the cluster too
O ya and I drive a 5 speed and shift like a granny,sometimes,(3 rpm-3 1/2rpm) when not trying to accelerate quick or when I try to conserve gas...being a college student and all.

 

the computed MPG on the dash on these have proved to be VERY accurate, there was a thread in the evo x section comparing the average MPG to the actual MPG and the furthest off was by .4 miles. this was done by resetting it before taking a short/long trip from start to finish, not including starting up and turning off and what not.

 

yes... very accurate... i can show you a picture of me getting 60+ mph. lol. but that was actually the trip(houston-san antonio) i got a lil over 27 average. ive been getting 25-26 since the temps dropped but thats more so highway. 1960 and 45(dayton-humble-spring) and was hitting a few redlights. also all this is on regular unleaded... i seem to never fill her up with premium before big trips XD

 

True because I've noticed mine is off about 5-20 mile's be that I sometimes take it to 6 1/2 but if I granny it the whole full tank it's usually within 10 miles or less correct

 

Hi: i have a 2009 lancer gts 2.4 my mods are RRM Header, CAI, Greedy Exhaust, RRm pulley and computer reflash ( stock computer tuned) and average of 34 mpg, but in a long trip i have seen 40+ on 93 octane shell fuel

 

Finally was able to get the MPG FROM THE CAR'S CLUSTER.

HERE IS HIGHWAY DRIVING (San Antonio to Houston,Texas) (NORMAL CLEAR WINTER DAY)




HERE is CITY DAILY DRIVING (CLEAR WINTER DAY)

 

40+ on a 2.4 GTS?
Maybe on a ECONOMY TUNED SETTING. But not on any racing or street tune. I know how to some what tune ECU's.

I've been learning has I go for about 6 months now and research of course on the internet and the performance shop right down the street from my home,which has the fastest EVO in Texas....8.9 in the 1/4 n I think he had a boost leak at that

 

People should not be using the fuel mileage in the display. Its optimistic by 2-3mpgs.

Also, some people are using different MPG ratings... Europe and USA use different MPGS.

I hand calculated my last tank... on 45 liters i got 372kms... which is 19.4MPG or 12.1 L/100kms... 100% city driving. Also is during the winter which destroys fuel mileage. I didnt buy this car for fuel mileage so i am ok with it

Winter gas and temps kill fuel mileage anywhere between 2-5 mpgs depending on how cold it is.