Notices
Lancer Engine Tech Discuss specs/changes to the engine from cams to fully balanced and blueprinted engines!

NA SETUP STAGE 2 Begins....

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 18, 2004 | 10:02 PM
  #16  
bahamut's Avatar
Evolved Member
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 2,167
Likes: 0
From: TB, FL
First off, what's your flywheel HP goal? If you're thinking 300 flywheel, you're nuts!

If you're think 180 - 200 (tuning god) at absolute max. You'll need cam + tuning. W/o tuning, you'll follow the path of most H&A guys . . . plug and play and don't care about the rest. Then, they start scratching their head why they aren't getting the expect results.
Reply
Old Jan 18, 2004 | 10:10 PM
  #17  
eldanoloco's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 208
Likes: 0
From: The unemployment line
Screw it and go with 4 mikuni side-drafts. Carberatuers are for cool people.
Reply
Old Jan 18, 2004 | 10:17 PM
  #18  
eldanoloco's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 208
Likes: 0
From: The unemployment line
Originally posted by Guru_Del
from what i have heard is the safc is a waste as the lancer ecu wont add more fuel when you add more power, now you can lean it out where it is rich and you will see some gains from that. I know RRM is in the works for a new NA ecu system so you may want to wait for that. Now the safc thing could only apply to turbo guys but that is all i have really researched
Ok, I have searched and I have asked. But someone tell me. I haved used and have seen friends use the Apexi AFC (The OG version) and the SAFC on many of different cars. Tell me, why exactly does it not work with USDM Lancer ECU's? The most striaght up answer was that it does not see positive numbers. If they meant this as the ECU already knows what the MAS reading should be at a given RPM, the MAS is useless. If positive numbers they are telling me about are that of FI, ok I can see that, but its not the SAFC causeing it to read positive, its the turbo. Every answer I get is followed byt "...and thats my best interpretation" Damn it I want to know why?
Reply
Old Jan 18, 2004 | 11:18 PM
  #19  
pjal84's Avatar
Evolved Member
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 2,722
Likes: 0
From: Up to 80 miles north of Gilroy
https://www.evolutionm.net/forums/sh...0&pagenumber=1

In there bahamut and rhyzin try and piece it out a bit but for the most part, no one really has a definitive answer.
Reply
Old Jan 21, 2004 | 05:28 AM
  #20  
Mitsiman's Avatar
Evolved Member
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 697
Likes: 1
From: Perth, Western Australia
RPW is definitly still doing the twin tb project to be compatible with the single MAF sensor. Just like everything we are doing many projects all at once and need to focus on different ones at different times. We first finished the true duel systems for the mirage people and are now focusing on teh duel TB systems for MAF mirage / lancer / galant / eclipse people now with MAF sensors.

Looking to finish it within the next two months including testing.
Reply




All times are GMT -7. The time now is 03:01 PM.