Notices
Lancer Engine Tech Discuss specs/changes to the engine from cams to fully balanced and blueprinted engines!

Axleback to catback differences

Old Feb 18, 2004 | 03:31 PM
  #1  
Blacksheepdj's Avatar
Thread Starter
EvoM Staff Alumni
iTrader: (88)
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 8,733
Likes: 3
From: Concord Township, Ohio
Axleback to catback differences

OK, a question came to mind when I was looking over my long-term plans. How different are axleback exhausts (such as RRMs) and catbacks (any of them)? Basically, if I was poor/cheap and just got RRM's axleback, how much performance would I be losing compared to saving up for a catback?

To put it easier: for those who have had the RRM axleback and then gotten a catback, how much difference was there?
Reply
Old Feb 18, 2004 | 06:51 PM
  #2  
03RallyLancer's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 1,595
Likes: 0
From: Redneck KY
the old *** dyno would not notice unless FI was being used... you may get 1 or 2 our of it(maybe)
Reply
Old Feb 20, 2004 | 06:46 AM
  #3  
Blacksheepdj's Avatar
Thread Starter
EvoM Staff Alumni
iTrader: (88)
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 8,733
Likes: 3
From: Concord Township, Ohio
Well, I asked TURBOit, since he had both the RRM and now Buschur's catback, so I think I know which way I'm going to go. Now I just gotta get the $. Thanks for the input.
Reply
Old Feb 20, 2004 | 08:25 AM
  #4  
03RallyLancer's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 1,595
Likes: 0
From: Redneck KY
isnt turboit also turbo?
Reply
Old Feb 20, 2004 | 08:42 AM
  #5  
Blacksheepdj's Avatar
Thread Starter
EvoM Staff Alumni
iTrader: (88)
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 8,733
Likes: 3
From: Concord Township, Ohio
Yeah, but he was still able to answer my question.
Reply
Old Feb 20, 2004 | 12:13 PM
  #6  
ghostrider's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (13)
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 1,972
Likes: 0
From: Vancouver, WA
Going catback helps a lot more on the top end than an axleback will. But it also kills your bottom end until you get enough intake mods (forced induction included) to match/exceed the speed of exhaust flowing out.
Reply
Old Feb 21, 2004 | 08:49 AM
  #7  
IILANCERII02's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 1,360
Likes: 0
From: Naperville
Dont waste time with just the axle back - go fulll catback. You will like it alot more in the end.
Reply
Old Feb 21, 2004 | 09:46 AM
  #8  
Blacksheepdj's Avatar
Thread Starter
EvoM Staff Alumni
iTrader: (88)
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 8,733
Likes: 3
From: Concord Township, Ohio
Right now I'm leaning towards axleback, actually. I have no intention of going FI and I really miss my low-end. Plus, it's closer to my price range. Worst case, it may be a stop-gap until I get the header, throttle body, etc.
Reply
Old Feb 21, 2004 | 10:13 AM
  #9  
IILANCERII02's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 1,360
Likes: 0
From: Naperville
if you look at RRM's price for an axle back its like what ...270 i think.

Now if i would of gotten a custom cat-back with a muffler ofmy choice it would be been like 325 i think, but since i went bigger piping it bumped it up to 400$ because of the labor and ****.

SO i would much rather spend the extra 50$ or whatever and get a catback that will axle sound like you put some money onto your exhaust.

I spent 220$ on just an axle back at first and it sounded stock - literally no differnce or hardly any, went to the catback with the 2.25" piping and it was a little more UMPH and the nicer sound.
Reply
Old Feb 21, 2004 | 10:40 AM
  #10  
Blacksheepdj's Avatar
Thread Starter
EvoM Staff Alumni
iTrader: (88)
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 8,733
Likes: 3
From: Concord Township, Ohio
Well, I've heard good things about the RRM. I still have some time to consider it, I'm just in the planning stage.
Reply
Old Feb 21, 2004 | 09:39 PM
  #11  
IILANCERII02's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 1,360
Likes: 0
From: Naperville
ya the planning stage is kind of the hardest -- or actually its the making up your mind stage lol.
Reply
Old Feb 21, 2004 | 09:44 PM
  #12  
ghostrider's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (13)
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 1,972
Likes: 0
From: Vancouver, WA
I agree that a custom catback is easily the most cost-efficient way to go. Most custom jobs won't cost you more than $300 with a muffler unless you go with a spendier canister.
Reply
Old Feb 22, 2004 | 06:32 PM
  #13  
urbanknight's Avatar
Moderator
Bomb Squad Unit #02
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 4,090
Likes: 1
From: Los Angeles, CA
I am with Blacksheep, I saw a dyno from a non-turbo Lancer with a catback, and the hp is still climbing at 6000 rpm. That means he gave up torque to gain horsepower he will never see. So, I am either going to get an axleback or a custom catback with only 2" piping.
Reply
Old Feb 23, 2004 | 12:24 PM
  #14  
Drive02Lancer's Avatar
Evolved Member
20 Year Member
Photogenic
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 1,518
Likes: 1
From: BELLEVILLE, IL
im goin F/I this summer hopefully...should i go 2.5" cat-back or 2.25" i mean...will it make a big diff?

F/I im just talkin 5-6 psi nothing more than that really....my bro could custom my exhaust free..so should i have a shop just weld my muffler on and just have my bro do it when i visit him this summer? im lost here, lol
Reply
Old Feb 23, 2004 | 08:57 PM
  #15  
twinlancers2's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 18
Likes: 0
From: South Dakota
IILANCERII02 i don't agree about your sound comment, i got a magnaflow ($160) and had it welded in place of the old muffler (like $40) and it sounds great, how ever i'm saving up for the resonator and having it welded into place to get an even deeper sound, i really enjoy it, also as for going for bigger piping, no, not worth the loss on a N/A vehicle that prob. never be F/I, even if i do it wont cost that much to have the pipe dia. changed
Reply

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -7. The time now is 04:11 AM.