Notices
Lancer General Come on in and discuss the US Lancer.
View Poll Results: Intake or exhaust first?
Intake!
9
81.82%
Exhaust!
2
18.18%
Voters: 11. You may not vote on this poll

Intake or exhaust first?

Old Sep 23, 2003 | 02:05 PM
  #1  
Static's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolving Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 472
Likes: 0
From: Phoenix, Arizona
Intake or exhaust first?

Intake or exhaust first? Why? and does it really even matter?
Reply
Old Sep 23, 2003 | 02:11 PM
  #2  
HobieKopek's Avatar
EvoM Staff Alumni
20 Year Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 7,701
Likes: 0
From: Long Island
Intake. You don't want to lose your low end.
Reply
Old Sep 23, 2003 | 02:28 PM
  #3  
J'sLancerLS's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 445
Likes: 0
From: San Diego, CA
Do both at the same time, that's what I did. You'll notice more gain that way!
Reply
Old Sep 23, 2003 | 02:42 PM
  #4  
Static's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolving Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 472
Likes: 0
From: Phoenix, Arizona
did you notice a big diff at the butt dyno when you did both? Like a really noticeable diff? just wondering... thanks
Reply
Old Sep 23, 2003 | 03:00 PM
  #5  
WildRice's Avatar
Evolved Member
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 697
Likes: 0
From: Nothern CA
You need to do both as one works with the other. Intake is cheaper so you will probably start there, just try to find one that will work well with your planned exhaust mods and other engine tuning.
Reply
Old Sep 23, 2003 | 03:06 PM
  #6  
ghostrider's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (13)
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 1,972
Likes: 0
From: Vancouver, WA
Originally posted by HobieKopek
Intake. You don't want to lose your low end.
End of conversation.
Reply
Old Sep 23, 2003 | 04:17 PM
  #7  
Archangelite's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (32)
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 1,035
Likes: 0
From: Austin, tx
i thought that if you get exhaust first, more exhaust flows out faster but air cannot get in faster cuz of the stock intake restriction.... oh wait, this conversation is over...
Reply
Old Sep 23, 2003 | 06:35 PM
  #8  
ghostrider's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (13)
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 1,972
Likes: 0
From: Vancouver, WA
It is over. You just explained why it's more beneficial to get an intake first. You don't sacrifice anything when going with an intake. You do, however, sacrifice some low end when going exhaust first.
Reply
Old Sep 23, 2003 | 06:37 PM
  #9  
HobieKopek's Avatar
EvoM Staff Alumni
20 Year Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 7,701
Likes: 0
From: Long Island
If you can't afford both at the same time, do the intake first. Simply put, a free flowing exhaust without an equally free flowing intake will result in some (possibly noticable) loss of low end and mid-range torque but may net higher results at the top end if the intake end can suck enough air. Honestly, this stuff's been posted about a couple hundred times.
Reply
Old Sep 23, 2003 | 06:39 PM
  #10  
HobieKopek's Avatar
EvoM Staff Alumni
20 Year Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 7,701
Likes: 0
From: Long Island
Originally posted by archangelite
i thought that if you get exhaust first, more exhaust flows out faster but air cannot get in faster cuz of the stock intake restriction.... oh wait, this conversation is over...
If you have an overly efficient stock intake system then sure...why not? In the cases of turbocharged cars usually an exhaust is the better way to go first for more noticable gains, but we're talking about an economically designed 101-103whp grocery getter here.
Reply


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -7. The time now is 04:16 PM.