Notices
The Loft / EvoM Car Talk Corner The landing pad for automotive discussions, news, articles, and opinions. A place for the community to kick back and chat.

A Corvette that you don't want to mess with

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 15, 2004 | 08:44 AM
  #16  
dizzigital's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 1,697
Likes: 0
From: Santa Monica, CA
Originally Posted by JNasty4G63
The one in that vid I posted was a 6M. Thats what makes it even more impressive. Trying to launch a car like that has to be a chore. If all I wanted was to run #'s, I'd have an auto as well.

Hilg
ah, my bad.. was lookin' at pics
Reply
Old Oct 15, 2004 | 09:00 AM
  #17  
Tanner_Hall's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 397
Likes: 0
i have serious doubts about those stats. the 0-60 and 0-100 times are in open-wheel territory....so's the 1/4 for that matter.
Reply
Old Oct 15, 2004 | 09:15 AM
  #18  
naucrx's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (19)
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 1,406
Likes: 1
From: Columbus, OH
Twin Turbo C5s are no joke... fast as hell standard or auto. This one I drove with a couple weekends ago on a corvette drive had over 600whp.

Reply
Old Oct 15, 2004 | 09:20 AM
  #19  
spoolingEVOx's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 674
Likes: 0
From: Jersey, USA
damn.
Reply
Old Oct 15, 2004 | 09:21 AM
  #20  
kdogg's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 1,014
Likes: 0
From: NW PA
Originally Posted by naucrx
Twin Turbo C5s are no joke... fast as hell standard or auto. This one I drove with a couple weekends ago on a corvette drive had over 600whp.
No one doubts those are sickly fast! 0-60 mph under 2 seconds is hard to believe for a RWD street car. C&D have always ran article are mega HP vettes, mustangs, camaros, and vipers. They never get those numbers (on this Lingenfelter 'Vette webpage) because of lack of traction.
Reply
Old Oct 15, 2004 | 09:21 AM
  #21  
Homer-'s Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by GT7evo
0-60 in 1.97??????
that is frikin fast...is that even possible?
yes it is, a friend of mine has an escort MK1 used only for 1/4mile that goes from 0-60 in 1.43sec
Reply
Old Oct 15, 2004 | 09:37 AM
  #22  
DaWorstPlaya's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (31)
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 3,216
Likes: 7
From: Denver, CO
I like corvettes, they look sexy as hell ..... one of the few american cars I actually like ....
Reply
Old Oct 15, 2004 | 02:37 PM
  #23  
Cirrusly Evolvd's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (44)
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 1,584
Likes: 0
From: High-Plains Desert
That particular car uses drag slicks for those times. That is most certainly not on street tires.

And if the only thing you can come up with is "auto is gay", a lot of drag cars are auto and will shift faster than you can blink.

Last edited by Cirrusly Evolvd; Oct 15, 2004 at 07:43 PM.
Reply
Old Oct 15, 2004 | 05:15 PM
  #24  
astrocreep96's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 247
Likes: 0
From: SLC, UT
The new super tuner challenge in C&D has a lingefelter corvette. It quotes 800hp and 830 ft-lb of torque from a twin-turbo 427. It also has 345/30ZR-19 tires. C&D said an 11.6 second quarter mile at 136 mph, with a 0-60 of 4.1 seconds.

Granted, this is way slow for any modded corvette, so they were having obvious traction problems. But, the car is only RWD and it does way about 3300 lbs., so thats a lot of inertia to overcome. Even if this is slow for a lingenfelter, an 11.6 @136 is a far cry from a high 8 second quarter mile.
Reply
Old Oct 15, 2004 | 05:28 PM
  #25  
tmut121's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 174
Likes: 0
From: Bay Area, Cali
vettes are dope. something i'd like to have as a cruiser/weekend car when i'm retired. i just saw a show with the new C6. it was siiick!
Reply
Old Oct 15, 2004 | 05:29 PM
  #26  
AznFlip's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 2,808
Likes: 0
From: Seattle
Originally Posted by GT7evo
oh btw, vettes are ugly and gat no matter how fast they are lol
having a fast (ugly ) vette is better than having a fast civic, or any economy car (lancer, accord, etc.) . at least it can go fast out of the factory.... but ur right, they are ugly, id rather take the viper if i was to choose only domestic cars...
Reply
Old Oct 15, 2004 | 05:30 PM
  #27  
JohnnyChimpo's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 88
Likes: 0
From: Pasadena, CA
Originally Posted by naucrx
Twin Turbo C5s are no joke... fast as hell standard or auto. This one I drove with a couple weekends ago on a corvette drive had over 600whp.

That hood is Ghey
Reply
Old Oct 15, 2004 | 05:37 PM
  #28  
boostfed's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 632
Likes: 1
From: TN, near Nashville
Originally Posted by astrocreep96
The new super tuner challenge in C&D has a lingefelter corvette. It quotes 800hp and 830 ft-lb of torque from a twin-turbo 427. It also has 345/30ZR-19 tires. C&D said an 11.6 second quarter mile at 136 mph, with a 0-60 of 4.1 seconds.

Granted, this is way slow for any modded corvette, so they were having obvious traction problems. But, the car is only RWD and it does way about 3300 lbs., so thats a lot of inertia to overcome. Even if this is slow for a lingenfelter, an 11.6 @136 is a far cry from a high 8 second quarter mile.
first thing. look at his trap speed with street tires. that freakin fast. next thank how hard it is to launch an 800hp rwd on those street tires. I bet his 60ft's weren't even in the 1.9 range. I bet money that the same car in c&d test would run well into the 10's and maybe low 9's with the right kinda tires (slicks) and a good driver. IMO of course.

-chad-
Reply
Old Oct 15, 2004 | 05:49 PM
  #29  
astrocreep96's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 247
Likes: 0
From: SLC, UT
Agreed on the tires part. But someone was asking earlier if a RWD car with street tires could run an 8 second quarter mile with 800 hp, and thats clearly not going to happen.
As for the good driver part, either someone from lingenfelter or someone from C&D was driving the car, and I don't think either would be a slouch behing the wheel. The hennessey venom managed an 11.0 sec @ 143 with more or less equivalent power numbers. Even thats not really a good time, though.

I agree the trap speed is ridiculous (just imagine 0-136 in 11.6 seconds, stock evos take longer to get to 100).

Still, the point is the same, IF the lingenfelter at the beginning of the thread is quoting 0-60 mph in less than 2 seconds and and 8.95 second quarter mile on street tires, the owner is full of it.
Reply
Old Oct 15, 2004 | 06:45 PM
  #30  
WestSideBilly's Avatar
El Jefe
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 3,965
Likes: 84
From: Asleep at the wheel
A better test than the 1/4 would be a standing start mile. Offset some of the traction issues. It wouldn't surprise me to see 200 at the end of that mile.
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 01:15 AM.