Notices
The Loft / EvoM Car Talk Corner The landing pad for automotive discussions, news, articles, and opinions. A place for the community to kick back and chat.

1996 Eclipse RS Vs 2003 Lancer ES

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old May 16, 2005 | 01:06 PM
  #1  
pusha2009's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 209
Likes: 0
From: Fredericksburg, Virginia
1996 Eclipse RS Vs 2003 Lancer ES

Hello,
I might get a Eclipse RS and was wondering how it compares to the lancer. Are they alot faster and do they have more potenial.
Thanks
Reply
Old May 16, 2005 | 01:10 PM
  #2  
mike69's Avatar
Evolved Member
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 1,025
Likes: 0
From: NA
Depends. Basically no. They used to be really weak, then they put in the 420A motor (from the Neon R/T), which is still weak. There's no point in getting one unless you want to pour lots of money into it to become the fastest niche car. A good Eclipse to start with would be the GSX, Galant VR4, Talon TSi AWD or even a Plymouth Laser, which all have the 4G63. Maybe a Silvia or 300ZX TT if you could afford it.
Reply
Old May 16, 2005 | 02:38 PM
  #3  
.L.'s Avatar
.L.
Evolved Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 1,091
Likes: 0
From: IL
i've seen both at the track.
buddy automatic stock eclipse -18.0
buddy 5 speed stock eclipse - 16.9
buddy automatic stock lancer - 17.6
me 5 speed stock lancer - 16.7

all decent/good drivers. nothing professional though. so all in all the lancer is a bit quicker
Reply
Old May 16, 2005 | 03:17 PM
  #4  
pusha2009's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 209
Likes: 0
From: Fredericksburg, Virginia
Originally Posted by wEstSidE
Depends. Basically no. They used to be really weak, then they put in the 420A motor (from the Neon R/T), which is still weak. There's no point in getting one unless you want to pour lots of money into it to become the fastest niche car. A good Eclipse to start with would be the GSX, Galant VR4, Talon TSi AWD or even a Plymouth Laser, which all have the 4G63. Maybe a Silvia or 300ZX TT if you could afford it.
I am going to most likely get the Eclipse do to its nice looks. I will just keep it stock and make it to a stocker. I like the Eclipse and its a nice daily driver.
Reply
Old May 17, 2005 | 01:13 PM
  #5  
mike69's Avatar
Evolved Member
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 1,025
Likes: 0
From: NA
Well, if you don't care, why did you ask about potential and speed?
If you don't care about speed and just want the looks, go for it! There's nothing visually wrong with the eclipse, I think it looks futuristic.
Reply
Old May 17, 2005 | 02:39 PM
  #6  
umiami80's Avatar
Account Disabled
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 2,026
Likes: 0
From: NJ
Get the 4G63 or you'll be SORRY, they are VERY VERY slow otherwise, like 145 HP
Reply
Old May 17, 2005 | 03:24 PM
  #7  
mike69's Avatar
Evolved Member
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 1,025
Likes: 0
From: NA
He knows that. He said he only wants the styling.
Reply
Old May 17, 2005 | 03:33 PM
  #8  
UT_Evo's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 3,601
Likes: 0
From: SL,UT
Last time I checked (no offense to Lancer guys) the Eclipses all have way more potential.

If you're talking about how they look, the new Ralliarts look AWESOME IMO, especially compared to the current new Eclipses; however, when the new '06 Eclipse comes out... it'll be hard to say for sure, I really like the '06 E in the black color.
Reply
Old May 17, 2005 | 04:07 PM
  #9  
akasirlancerlot's Avatar
Account Disabled
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 2,491
Likes: 0
From: Los Angeles California
what kind of potential... handling... or engine? looks?
Reply
Old May 17, 2005 | 04:12 PM
  #10  
pusha2009's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 209
Likes: 0
From: Fredericksburg, Virginia
Exclamation

Originally Posted by umiami80
Get the 4G63 or you'll be SORRY, they are VERY VERY slow otherwise, like 145 HP
I am not talking about the new Eclipse because I think that looks to much like a Scion TC. Also I will not be sorry. I am not doing any road racing and I do not need to show off. I just buy cars to get to point a to point b. I do not need max speed if I wanted that I would not be looking at the Eclipse or the Lancer. I am sorry but you guys people like you kind of get on my nerves. How fast does a car need to be. This is exacly why teens get in car accidents. I do not need a hot rod to go to school.
Thanks
Reply
Old May 17, 2005 | 06:49 PM
  #11  
umiami80's Avatar
Account Disabled
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 2,026
Likes: 0
From: NJ
I was talking about the 1995-1996 NT Eclipse above, the 420a Motor consisting of the RS model and the GS. They suck, they really do. GET A SPYDER atleast it has a 2.4.
Reply
Old May 17, 2005 | 06:52 PM
  #12  
JDM_FeTiSh's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 258
Likes: 0
From: [6][5][0]san mateo, California..."rEpN dA YaY aReA!!"
yea since the RS n GS always has a valve cover problem always leaking oil.........
Reply
Old May 17, 2005 | 07:03 PM
  #13  
pusha2009's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 209
Likes: 0
From: Fredericksburg, Virginia
Originally Posted by umiami80
I was talking about the 1995-1996 NT Eclipse above, the 420a Motor consisting of the RS model and the GS. They suck, they really do. GET A SPYDER atleast it has a 2.4.
Like I said I am not in a race I am going to point a to point b.
Reply
Old May 17, 2005 | 07:08 PM
  #14  
AznX TL's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 2,106
Likes: 0
From: hershey,pa
umm didnt u sell ur lancer for a RSX
Reply
Old May 17, 2005 | 07:15 PM
  #15  
pusha2009's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 209
Likes: 0
From: Fredericksburg, Virginia
Originally Posted by Azn rice racer
umm didnt u sell ur lancer for a RSX
No If you would have read a thread from awhille ago I did not buy the RSX.
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 12:15 PM.