Notices
The Loft / EvoM Car Talk Corner The landing pad for automotive discussions, news, articles, and opinions. A place for the community to kick back and chat.

2008 T/C Cobalt SS faster around the Ring than BMW 335i

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 31, 2007, 05:20 PM
  #16  
Account Disabled
iTrader: (1)
 
Erik@JNZtuning's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Pennsylvania
Posts: 116
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I have always thought the cars were under rated in performance and this new model ups that ante. Build quality on the interior hopefully moved up a peg as well.
Old Oct 31, 2007, 05:44 PM
  #17  
Evolving Member
iTrader: (20)
 
DTM2188's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: S. Jersey
Posts: 165
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by THUB
II also almost bought one. And in the first year, yes the G85 was optional, mysteriously packaged with seats. But after the debut year, chevy made all SS S/C's with the quaife. can't remember if it was 05 or 04 that G85 was an option. Later years, thhe seats were packaged alone.
2005 was the packaged year, thats the year I had.
Old Oct 31, 2007, 07:55 PM
  #18  
Newbie
 
Klei14's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: NY
Posts: 70
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
wow the new SS is a turbo, Upgrade for chevy
Old Oct 31, 2007, 08:01 PM
  #19  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (21)
 
VenomEVO8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Da Burgh
Posts: 502
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
GM has always made some great concepts.. its just the fact they never bring them out.. but I do like this SS..
Old Oct 31, 2007, 09:27 PM
  #20  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (18)
 
fromWRXtoEVO's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Tucson
Posts: 6,087
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
I watched the video and I compared it with other supercars times from this list:

http://www.supercars.net/PitLane?vie...ID=0&tID=10073

Carlos
Old Nov 1, 2007, 07:19 AM
  #21  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (7)
 
gaulrich2003's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Southern, Ohio
Posts: 544
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Of topic but I watched the Mellon Tuning Video which was on the same page as the link to the cobalt video. He races a new viper and does well. Good Stuff.
Old Nov 7, 2007, 02:58 AM
  #22  
Evolved Member
 
EVOfunk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Bavaria, Germany
Posts: 570
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I will have to raise a BS flag on this matter. GM units in Europe with the 2.0 Ecotec 260hp like the Opel Astra GTC (similar size/weight) were actually pretty sluggish: 15.0 @ 95mph, so how in the hell a car with such terrible performance and only 300 lbs lighter can be faster than the mighty 335 at the Ring?
Old Nov 7, 2007, 08:19 AM
  #23  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (5)
 
AznX TL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: hershey,pa
Posts: 2,106
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
yeah i honestly dont believe it either, but i guess we'll find out when they start coming out.
Old Nov 7, 2007, 08:44 AM
  #24  
Evolving Member
 
ak47m203's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Tx,
Posts: 422
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
it's too bad they kill srt4. It's the right competitions for this GM baby.
Old Nov 7, 2007, 09:02 AM
  #25  
Newbie
 
Grav's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 74
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by EVOfunk
I will have to raise a BS flag on this matter. GM units in Europe with the 2.0 Ecotec 260hp like the Opel Astra GTC (similar size/weight) were actually pretty sluggish: 15.0 @ 95mph, so how in the hell a car with such terrible performance and only 300 lbs lighter can be faster than the mighty 335 at the Ring?
Is there really anything mighty about a one-wheel drive car that weighs close to 4,000 lbs, that struggles to beat the performance numbers of an 7 year old S2000?
Old Nov 7, 2007, 01:08 PM
  #26  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (9)
 
jackygor's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: VANCOUVER BC
Posts: 1,837
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Why are you guys so surprised, 335i is meant to be a luxury cruiser, a high way bullet, its not a track car (in stock form at least) and it lacks LSD which is crucial on the track.

I read an article (or something) about how the 335i gets a huge power boost from procede, but the power doesn't translate well AT ALL on the track.
Old Nov 7, 2007, 09:40 PM
  #27  
Evolved Member
 
E. Haskell's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: NC
Posts: 675
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by EVOfunk
I will have to raise a BS flag on this matter. GM units in Europe with the 2.0 Ecotec 260hp like the Opel Astra GTC (similar size/weight) were actually pretty sluggish: 15.0 @ 95mph, so how in the hell a car with such terrible performance and only 300 lbs lighter can be faster than the mighty 335 at the Ring?
GM puts the Cobalt SS at 5.7 0-60 and 14.1 in the quarter. That seems about right considering the S/C version ran low-mid 14s.
Old Nov 9, 2007, 04:41 AM
  #28  
Evolved Member
 
EVOfunk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Bavaria, Germany
Posts: 570
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Grav
Is there really anything mighty about a one-wheel drive car that weighs close to 4,000 lbs, that struggles to beat the performance numbers of an 7 year old S2000?
I can't believe that I'm here defending the 335i, a car I've been critizicing due to 335 owners exercising a nasty superiority behavior towards any car on this planet, including all sorts of modified Evos

Definition of Mighty = 300 underated TQ @ 1300 RPM.

What performance numbers are u talking about vs. the S2000? You're not talking about quarter mile numbers, right? A stock 335 is a low-mid 13 car @ 105-106 mph. That's Evo territory, which means it will blow the doors off a S2000.

BTW, 2wd 335s weighs 3575 lbs, not 4000.
Old Nov 9, 2007, 04:59 AM
  #29  
Evolved Member
 
EVOfunk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Bavaria, Germany
Posts: 570
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by E. Haskell
GM puts the Cobalt SS at 5.7 0-60 and 14.1 in the quarter. That seems about right considering the S/C version ran low-mid 14s.
Yes, you're right. I was just sharing the disappointing numbers that the Opel Astra GTC 240 has been achieving through several tests over different countries in Europe. With such performance there's no way a Cobalt with similar specs/ engine could beat the 335 which by the way is almost as fast as the E92 M3 414HP V8 at the Ring.
Old Nov 9, 2007, 08:35 AM
  #30  
Newbie
 
Grav's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 74
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by EVOfunk
I can't believe that I'm here defending the 335i, a car I've been critizicing due to 335 owners exercising a nasty superiority behavior towards any car on this planet, including all sorts of modified Evos

Definition of Mighty = 300 underated TQ @ 1300 RPM.

What performance numbers are u talking about vs. the S2000? You're not talking about quarter mile numbers, right? A stock 335 is a low-mid 13 car @ 105-106 mph. That's Evo territory, which means it will blow the doors off a S2000.

BTW, 2wd 335s weighs 3575 lbs, not 4000.
Your definition of mighty would include several SUVs and trucks. I would think you would need to look at hp/weight ratio when it comes to classifying a car as mighty. The weight you listed does not include the driver. Also, I could be wrong, but I believe that the 335 does not come with an LSD, making it pretty much... 1 wheel drive. I've been wrong before, but my previous post wouldn't have been nearly as snarky had I prefaced like this.



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 02:59 AM.