View Poll Results: Should I get rid of the Evo for an S2000?
Get the S2000!



8
17.02%
Keep the Evo!



39
82.98%
Voters: 47. You may not vote on this poll
Sell Evo for S200. . .???
Sell Evo for S200. . .???
Hey guys, i've been thinking about getting rid of the evo for awhile now, but wasn't sure what I wanted. Recently, I fell in love with Honda S2000's. What do you guys think? The Evo is a great car, but I kind of want an S2000
Evolved Member
iTrader: (21)
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 1,453
Likes: 0
From: Clifton New Jersey Lived: Daytona Beach, Florida Lived: Port Orange, Florida
i have driven both i like the evo better. the evo is also more practical cause of its size. not to mention you can laugh at the weather in the face LOL.
Trending Topics
they are both great cars. of course the evo is much faster, takes well to mods. the evo can also take you and 4 friends confertably into a snow storm with no problem.
what it comes down to it keep the evo if you want to go fast
get the s2000 if you want to look good
what it comes down to it keep the evo if you want to go fast
get the s2000 if you want to look good
I would keep the EVO..
However, if you do buy a S2000 I would try to make sure its a 2.2L motor and stay away from F20c (mainly the early motors).
(*PERSONAL OPINION HERE*) I think it comes down to a problem of high RPM and lack of oil on the early cars. I am sure Honda knows of the problem and if you look at the changes to the motor it makes sense. They beefed up the oiling on the later F20c cars and then they switched to a lower RPM motor. Personally, I think the later F20c fix was a temporary thing as they where not sure if it would cure the problem and only did it so they could retool to produce the 2.2l motor. Also, anyone who says that they went to the 2.2l for more TQ well to me it doesn't make sense. They have been building cars like the Civic SI for awhile while hearing complaints about its low end performance and that is in a faimly style car. Now for no apparent reason they change the sports car motor for no HP gain? I don't buy it.
Main Thread
http://www.s2ki.com/forums/index.php...=0&#entry79753
Search on S2ki...
http://s2ki.com/search/results?q=Engine%20Failure
Personally, I like the S2000 and I think any car that had the failure would have already failed. However, I think that I would feel better with my own driving style knowing that I did all I could to not be one of the few that had to deal with a blown motor.
However, if you do buy a S2000 I would try to make sure its a 2.2L motor and stay away from F20c (mainly the early motors).
(*PERSONAL OPINION HERE*) I think it comes down to a problem of high RPM and lack of oil on the early cars. I am sure Honda knows of the problem and if you look at the changes to the motor it makes sense. They beefed up the oiling on the later F20c cars and then they switched to a lower RPM motor. Personally, I think the later F20c fix was a temporary thing as they where not sure if it would cure the problem and only did it so they could retool to produce the 2.2l motor. Also, anyone who says that they went to the 2.2l for more TQ well to me it doesn't make sense. They have been building cars like the Civic SI for awhile while hearing complaints about its low end performance and that is in a faimly style car. Now for no apparent reason they change the sports car motor for no HP gain? I don't buy it.
Main Thread
http://www.s2ki.com/forums/index.php...=0&#entry79753
Search on S2ki...
http://s2ki.com/search/results?q=Engine%20Failure
Personally, I like the S2000 and I think any car that had the failure would have already failed. However, I think that I would feel better with my own driving style knowing that I did all I could to not be one of the few that had to deal with a blown motor.

