Not all that expensive for the muscle!

http://www.autoblog.com/2007/11/29/2...art-at-37-995/

 

40k on a dodge.........ill pass

 

there's a reason its cheap ... blahhhh..

 

I like the looks.

 

I wonder how accurate the 1/4 mile thing on the car will be!

 

"You ask any ricer, any real ricer. It doesn't matter if the other guy is racing or not. A win is a win."

That is funny!!

 

blah how cheap can that panel look...god dodge needs interior design help

 

looks pretty nice, is there a price on the new camaro yet?

 

"you get what you pay for?"

 

Fugly!

 

WoW! let me buy a new car that is an old car? to each his own.
oh and marcio I am with you on guns of the patriots! go snake

 

Well considering the EVO and STI are about the same price, I don't think it's too expensive.....considering you get 425+hp (134hp more than the EVO).

 

I don't think it looks bad at all. Just going with that retro look like every other car manufacturer. The gauge's I dig.

 

134 more hp doesnt justify the tag and comparing it against an evo. I'm not a evo slave and gonna say "the evos better yadadada".. The evo is a completely diff type of car. We have ACD, they have a 1/4 and 0-60 timer. Get the picture..

PS: although it has 425hp, im sure an evo with far less hp could take one no problem so HP racing is a noob game imo

 

40k on a mitsubishi.......ill pass