Notices
The Loft / EvoM Car Talk Corner The landing pad for automotive discussions, news, articles, and opinions. A place for the community to kick back and chat.

2010 Hyundai Genesis Coupe

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Aug 1, 2008 | 07:00 PM
  #16  
Evo2wIsh4's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 543
Likes: 0
From: South Orlando
Found some nice pics here

http://seriouswheels.com/cars/2010/t...esis-Coupe.htm
Reply
Old Aug 2, 2008 | 12:07 PM
  #17  
juice_evo_VII's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 228
Likes: 0
From: Ashburn, VA
Nice pics. Looking like a really good RWD platform for around 22k (4 cyl turbo ) model.
Reply
Old Aug 2, 2008 | 12:29 PM
  #18  
Brian's Avatar
EvoM Staff Alumni
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,390
Likes: 1
From: Internets
I was pretty excited about this, but isn't it clocking in at like 3700lbs?
Reply
Old Aug 2, 2008 | 12:30 PM
  #19  
juice_evo_VII's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 228
Likes: 0
From: Ashburn, VA
Gosh I hope not.

Edit: In the pics from the tuner invite, I see a guy in a Forced Performance T Shirt - hrmmmmm? Thoughts FP?

Found Specs:

GENESIS COUPE SPECIFICATIONS
-- Configuration: Front engine, rear-wheel drive
-- Wheelbase: 2820 mm / 111.0 inches
-- Overall length: 4630 mm / 182.3 inches
-- Overall width: 1865 mm / 73.4 inches
-- Overall height: 1380 mm / 54.3 inches
-- Wheels: 18-inch or 19-inch five-spoke
-- Engine types: 3.8-liter V6 or 2.0-liter 4-cylinder turbo
-- Est. horsepower V6: 306 @ 6,000 rpm (regular fuel)
-- Est. horsepower V6: 310 @ 6,000 rpm (premium fuel)
-- Est. torque V6: 263 lb. ft. @ 4,700 rpm (regular and premium fuel)
-- Est. horsepower 2.0t: 212 @ 6,000 rpm (regular fuel)
-- Est. horsepower 2.0t: 223 @ 6,000 rpm (premium fuel)
-- Est. torque 2.0t: 217 lb. ft. @ 2,500 rpm (regular and premium fuel)
-- Block & head materials: aluminum for both engines
-- Valvetrain: DOHC for both engines
-- Valve timing: continuously variable valve timing for both engines
(Dual for 2.0t)
-- Estimated 0-60 mph V6: under 6 seconds
-- Transmission types: 6-speed manual, 5-speed automatic (4-cylinder) or
6-speed manual, 6-speed automatic (V6)
-- Front brakes: 12.6-inch (standard) 13.4-inch (Brembo package)
-- Rear brakes: 12.4-inch (standard) 13.0-inch (Brembo package)
-- Front calipers: single piston floating (standard), monobloc
four-piston (Brembo package)
-- Rear calipers: single piston floating (standard) monobloc four-piston
(Brembo package)
-- Limited slip differential (Optional)
-- Est. top speed: 149 mph (V6), 137 mph (2.0t)
-- Base curb weight: 3549 lbs. (V6); 3439 lbs. (4-cylinder)

Last edited by juice_evo_VII; Aug 2, 2008 at 12:51 PM.
Reply
Old Aug 6, 2008 | 09:35 AM
  #20  
silvrevo's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 1,114
Likes: 0
From: Big Red Country
Yea old news for sure............

A big Wig at Hyundia in a car mag about 3-4 months ago said that the internals are good for 28+psi stock, and said it was made that way with the "tooners" in mind.

That and a stock lsd,, and you young "tooners" are going to have a fast , fun, cheap car!!!!!!
Reply
Old Aug 6, 2008 | 10:08 AM
  #21  
yooyooyoo's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 295
Likes: 0
From: SoCal
Hyundai's going to hit the mark on this one. As it stands there are few cars in this segment.
Reply
Old Aug 6, 2008 | 05:42 PM
  #22  
pwrofturbo's Avatar
Evolved Member
15 Year Member
Photogenic
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 997
Likes: 2
From: Dallas
I was really excited until I saw 3439lbs...
Reply
Old Aug 6, 2008 | 06:12 PM
  #23  
otter's Avatar
EvoM Administrator
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 8,624
Likes: 14
From: Seat 8A
Yeah, it's a bit of a porker, but it has the potential to make enough power to overcome it.
Reply
Old Aug 6, 2008 | 06:15 PM
  #24  
itsme4g63's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (46)
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 638
Likes: 0
From: Outer Space
this car ahs been a long time commin, I think the evo x might be old news when this hits the market, but then again they are two different cars with different purposes.
Reply
Old Aug 7, 2008 | 11:35 AM
  #25  
smiley9k's Avatar
Thread Starter
Newbie
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 53
Likes: 0
From: Los Angeles, CA
Originally Posted by otter
Yeah, it's a bit of a porker, but it has the potential to make enough power to overcome it.
GT-R??
Reply
Old Aug 8, 2008 | 10:32 AM
  #26  
silvrevo's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 1,114
Likes: 0
From: Big Red Country
Nice link Evoish2wish guy,,,,,,,,,,

Too bad the Zf tranny is only avaliable in the v-6... always has to be somthing.

The 6 speed zf auto is the same used in the BMW 135, and 335's I believe.

And if thats the case,, that v-6 with the auto is going to be a fine car to have.

Keyless push button start, HID's, and a lsd,,, for under $27iish?


Plus a 100k warrenty,, I think they have a winner, for a guy who wants to keep a car for a long time, andf not modd it.
Reply
Old Aug 8, 2008 | 07:41 PM
  #27  
Hannibalzero's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 79
Likes: 0
From: Northern VA
I'm kind of disappointed with the final production design. It is waaaay toned down from the aggressive conecpt design. I expected it to change a little bit, but this coupe looks very bland compared to the concept.

Reply
Old Aug 8, 2008 | 07:57 PM
  #28  
VincentX's Avatar
Account Disabled
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 857
Likes: 0
^Yeah, that looks bad ***.
Reply
Old Aug 8, 2008 | 08:29 PM
  #29  
pwrofturbo's Avatar
Evolved Member
15 Year Member
Photogenic
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 997
Likes: 2
From: Dallas
Originally Posted by otter
Yeah, it's a bit of a porker, but it has the potential to make enough power to overcome it.
Right but it's not the power that I'm worried about, that much weight reduces every aspect of performance.
Reply
Old Aug 9, 2008 | 01:14 AM
  #30  
yooyooyoo's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 295
Likes: 0
From: SoCal
If you changed out the front bumper/sideskirt/hood the car would be pretty similar. The cost of producing headlights in the fashion of the concept would be $$$$.

Originally Posted by Hannibalzero
I'm kind of disappointed with the final production design. It is waaaay toned down from the aggressive conecpt design. I expected it to change a little bit, but this coupe looks very bland compared to the concept.

Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
AutoMotoSports
Automotosports - Illinois
335
Feb 19, 2010 06:12 AM
Clark_Kent
The Loft / EvoM Car Talk Corner
92
Mar 23, 2009 07:37 PM
BABYEVO1
The Loft / EvoM Car Talk Corner
23
Nov 4, 2008 11:22 AM




All times are GMT -7. The time now is 11:11 PM.