Notices
The Loft / EvoM Car Talk Corner The landing pad for automotive discussions, news, articles, and opinions. A place for the community to kick back and chat.

Honda s200 or Nissan 350z

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Aug 8, 2008 | 02:24 PM
  #1  
sly's Avatar
sly
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 958
Likes: 0
From: Dekalb, ILLINOIS>
Honda s200 or Nissan 350z

Which would you prefer the Honda s2000 or Nissan 350z as a daily driver?
Reply
Old Aug 8, 2008 | 02:25 PM
  #2  
kanyonkid's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (33)
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 1,276
Likes: 0
From: SoCal/MS
s2k
Reply
Old Aug 8, 2008 | 02:25 PM
  #3  
EvoDan2004's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (94)
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 8,984
Likes: 8
From: New Jersey
honda s200......
Reply
Old Aug 8, 2008 | 02:30 PM
  #4  
sly's Avatar
sly
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 958
Likes: 0
From: Dekalb, ILLINOIS>
Is there a reason you guys chose s2000 other than looks.

I`ve been leaning towards the s2000 but i hear they perform really bad in winter esp with Illinois weather
Reply
Old Aug 8, 2008 | 02:33 PM
  #5  
grillpt's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (24)
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 2,680
Likes: 5
From: 610
^ 350Z is no picnic in the snow either.

Buy the Honda, better resale, and who doesn't doesn't like shifting at 9K (8000k if you get a 04 or newer). More fun to drive in general, there lighter and more tossable (if thats a word). Look for an 03 or newer, they have the glass rear window, then the major update in 04.

Last edited by grillpt; Aug 8, 2008 at 02:38 PM.
Reply
Old Aug 8, 2008 | 02:42 PM
  #6  
jpetro10's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 184
Likes: 0
From: Tucson AZ
Had an S2K, my brother had a 350. He wants an s2k now, lol. Im thinkin about trading my IX for another S2K. They're fun as hell to drive, I had 108k on mine and had ZERO problems with it! They're a great car! Its either the S2k or an NSX.
Reply
Old Aug 8, 2008 | 02:45 PM
  #7  
itzcharlez's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 369
Likes: 1
From: new york
I was debating the same thing and it came down to comfortability. I'm 6ft tall and the s2k just didn't cut it. Test drive then decide
Reply
Old Aug 8, 2008 | 02:56 PM
  #8  
inco9nito99's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (90)
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 1,917
Likes: 0
From: Roselle, IL
350z; more spacious, more amenities, more power.
Reply
Old Aug 8, 2008 | 03:09 PM
  #9  
slicedbreadno2's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 1,197
Likes: 0
From: Chicago
S2k imo more rare, look better and has such a rigid body and handle really well. I am bias though since the evo is getting traded in for a S2K also never underestimate a Honda. also the S2k is at least 500-600 lbs lighter than a 350Z which makes it much nimbler and it was designed to be a convertible from the start unlike some of those 350Z's out there.
Reply
Old Aug 8, 2008 | 03:14 PM
  #10  
Hikaru's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 768
Likes: 1
From: Atlanta
S2K by far. 350s are as common as Accords. Plus better resale on da "H".
Reply
Old Aug 8, 2008 | 03:20 PM
  #11  
revvin9k's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (23)
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 2,315
Likes: 0
From: IL
If I could only turn back the hands of time, I would've kept my S and never bought this nightmare called an Evo. S2000 all day long.



Reply
Old Aug 8, 2008 | 03:20 PM
  #12  
Tristar's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 1,572
Likes: 0
From: Chicago
If you have to drive it in winter in Chicago go with the 350z. At least it has traction control and a bit more ground clearance, nevermind more insulation to keep out the cold.

I prefer the s2000 if it doesnt involve winter. That was actually the reason I bought the Evo, winters in Chicago are rough with rwd. Oddly enough, I ended up buying a daily driver and the Evo to this day has never seen snow or salt. Go figure...

In hind site I wish I would have gotten an s2000 or Elise. Im not big on hp or mod capability, more so on handling.
Reply
Old Aug 8, 2008 | 03:21 PM
  #13  
revvin9k's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (23)
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 2,315
Likes: 0
From: IL
Originally Posted by Tristar Racing
If you have to drive it in winter in Chicago go with the 350z. At least it has traction control and a bit more ground clearance, nevermind more insulation to keep out the cold.

I prefer the s2000 if it doesnt involve winter. That was actually the reason I bought the Evo, winters in Chicago are rough with rwd. Oddly enough, I ended up buying a daily driver and the Evo to this day has never seen snow or salt. Go figure...

In hind site I wish I would have gotten an s2000 or Elise. Im not big on hp or mod capability, more so on handling.
LMAO, thats why I got rid of my S, winter came.
Reply
Old Aug 8, 2008 | 03:24 PM
  #14  
btownsoccer22's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,004
Likes: 0
From: Indiana
Originally Posted by Hikaru
S2K by far. 350s are as common as Accords. Plus better resale on da "H".
I totally agree i see EVERYONE driving 350Zs... even grandmas.
I test drove a S2K once and theres nothing like shifting at 8000k
Reply
Old Aug 8, 2008 | 03:25 PM
  #15  
tvbf1's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 1,218
Likes: 0
From: California
Both are great cars, but I like the S2K more.

350Z has more low end grunt so daily driving is a bit better. S2K comes to life in the upper RPM.

I just like the S2K look better because the 350Z seem dated already for me.
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 12:19 PM.