Notices
The Loft / EvoM Car Talk Corner The landing pad for automotive discussions, news, articles, and opinions. A place for the community to kick back and chat.

370Z auto 13.1 @ 108mph....

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old May 18, 2009 | 05:22 PM
  #16  
596736's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (15)
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,815
Likes: 1
From: NNJ
Originally Posted by 6-speed
Would Nissan have sent a ringer to Car and Driver?

Some manufacturers have been known to do this.


Though at 3368 pounds and 332 bhp the numbers aren't impossible and I believe early dynos show the car puts down about 280-290 whp on a dynojet.


I'm actually planning to test drive a 370z shortly (standard shift of course).
With these numbers I highly doubt a stock 370z would be trapping 108mph.
Reply
Old May 18, 2009 | 06:30 PM
  #17  
awdwannabe's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 277
Likes: 0
From: Chicago
Originally Posted by sblvro
this is bench racing but a stock evo9 does 12.9 sec to a 1/4

So does a stock 8.... with me driving
Reply
Old May 18, 2009 | 07:35 PM
  #18  
hova00's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 505
Likes: 0
From: WILMINGTON
Originally Posted by 596736
With these numbers I highly doubt a stock 370z would be trapping 108mph.
I dont doubt the #'s since i ran a 13.5@106 in my g/f's 07 350z (auto) that she had.

I didnt think that her car would have been that quick but sure enough it was and also very consistant.
Reply
Old May 18, 2009 | 07:39 PM
  #19  
DepoRacing's Avatar
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 418
Likes: 0
From: North
Its a nice car and stock for stock it would be a close race, but they are pretty much stuck at that horsepower until a turbo kit comes out. that will be 5 grand plus installation.
Reply
Old May 18, 2009 | 10:07 PM
  #20  
596736's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (15)
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,815
Likes: 1
From: NNJ
Originally Posted by hova00
I dont doubt the #'s since i ran a 13.5@106 in my g/f's 07 350z (auto) that she had.

I didnt think that her car would have been that quick but sure enough it was and also very consistant.
I'm going to guess with the gentlemen agreement that the z is putting out more than that is advertised, if they are pulling those traps.
Reply
Old May 18, 2009 | 10:18 PM
  #21  
ODUB's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 4,033
Likes: 2
From: Baton Rouge, Louisiana
Originally Posted by sblvro
this is bench racing but a stock evo9 does 12.9 sec to a 1/4
i did 12.82 @ 107.41 in mine if the track hadn't been cold, and i had a way around the water box, i could have gone lower.... check my other thread, and it turns out i had another unknown gremlin on my 12.8 run...

https://www.evolutionm.net/forums/ev...ff-thread.html
Reply
Old May 18, 2009 | 10:32 PM
  #22  
sblvro's Avatar
EvoM Community Team Leader
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 3,135
Likes: 6
From: chicago, michigan, arkansas
Originally Posted by sblvro
this is bench racing but a stock evo9 does 12.9 sec to a 1/4

ODUB says:
i did 12.82 @ 107.41 in mine if the track hadn't been cold, and i had a way around the water box, i could have gone lower.... check my other thread, and it turns out i had another unknown gremlin on my 12.8 run...


I was being conservative in the estimate time
Reply




All times are GMT -7. The time now is 12:36 PM.