Notices
The Loft / EvoM Car Talk Corner The landing pad for automotive discussions, news, articles, and opinions. A place for the community to kick back and chat.

Stock vs Stock: Evo IX competitors

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 29, 2011 | 01:35 PM
  #16  
tigergt's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 15
Likes: 0
From: VA
You said phalic and the first thing I thought of was the MCoupe, I think it was the 2002 MY that had the S54 engine, 315hp-ish, you could probably find one for low twenties, most available though are the earlier years with the S52 engine making much less power. Not sure how they stacked in the handling department, but it's a M, so it probably does pretty well.
edit, that's 315 hp in the 2001 and 2002s and 240 hp in the 1999/2000 MY.

Last edited by tigergt; Dec 29, 2011 at 01:40 PM.
Reply
Old Dec 29, 2011 | 01:49 PM
  #17  
kyoo's Avatar
Evolved Member
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (29)
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 10,834
Likes: 283
From: US
evo 7-10, e46 m3, any gen sti, etc...

just make sure for stock the ix has the rear diff in proper configuration
Reply
Old Dec 30, 2011 | 07:51 AM
  #18  
mshilto89's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 534
Likes: 1
From: Minnesota
Originally Posted by Kracka
Honda S2000

Stock for stock, it will run with an Evo on the highway. In good conditions it will out-handle the Evo too. I used to own one...great car.
Hmm, did not realize they were that quick. I sat, well, "tried" sitting in one that a friend of mine has. Being 6'3" does have it's disadvantages.
Reply
Old Dec 30, 2011 | 08:19 AM
  #19  
otter's Avatar
EvoM Administrator
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 8,624
Likes: 14
From: Seat 8A
Originally Posted by mshilto89
Hmm, did not realize they were that quick. I sat, well, "tried" sitting in one that a friend of mine has. Being 6'3" does have it's disadvantages.
Odd, I'm the same height and I find the S2000 to be surprisingly spacious once you're sitting in it. Getting in and out was comical, though.
Reply
Old Dec 30, 2011 | 08:26 AM
  #20  
mshilto89's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 534
Likes: 1
From: Minnesota
Originally Posted by otter
Odd, I'm the same height and I find the S2000 to be surprisingly spacious once you're sitting in it. Getting in and out was comical, though.
Not for me, and as far as his interior goes it was stock. The powerplant was the only thing modded on the car. Getting out was easy I just had to fall on the ground, literally. But while I was sitting in it I felt like Jeremy Clarckson in the Fiat 500, or the Murcielago. My knees were basically attached to the steering wheel except for when I pressed the clutch in, and the whole time I was sitting in it I had to hunch my neck to the side because I couldn't scoot down any further. I actually fit in his wife's Miata better, but then again, it's a convertable.
Reply
Old Dec 30, 2011 | 08:44 AM
  #21  
S13 Curtis's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 275
Likes: 0
From: Orlando,FL
S2000 bottom end is stronger also.
Reply
Old Dec 30, 2011 | 09:35 AM
  #22  
tkromer's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 705
Likes: 1
From: Morgantown, WV
Saturn Sky Redline/Pontiac Solstice GXP.

260HP, but much lighter (a bump under 2900 lbs).

Stock Redline I ran a 13.82@99, I think the Evo IX can run as low as a 13.4@103-105 in good hands. From a roll they're pretty even, and handling-wise I'd assume fairly even as well. I own an X not a IX, but my Evo gives me more confidence in the turns, yet I'm not actually going any faster.
Reply
Old Dec 30, 2011 | 02:53 PM
  #23  
Carloverx's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (26)
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 1,414
Likes: 0
From: NJ
Originally Posted by S13 Curtis
S2000 bottom end is stronger also.
I'm not convinced of this. From the casual web surfing i've done, it seems the bottom ends just look stronger because the cars make more peak hp, but in reality it's their total lack of bottom end tq that's allowing them to survive.

And there are many cars stock for stock that are faster than evo's including BMW's (135, 335), Mustangs, etc. And we're not even talking about from a roll.
Reply
Old Dec 30, 2011 | 02:58 PM
  #24  
Montu's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 498
Likes: 0
From: Nor Cal
keep in mind the price range is <25k...don't think you can get a 135 that cheap
Reply
Old Dec 30, 2011 | 04:52 PM
  #25  
slim8605's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 191
Likes: 0
From: Joliet, IL
Originally Posted by Montu
keep in mind the price range is <25k...don't think you can get a 135 that cheap
There's a few of them around here. I guess it depends on location.
Reply
Old Dec 30, 2011 | 04:59 PM
  #26  
boostedwrx's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (27)
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 5,034
Likes: 2
From: Seattle, WA
Mustang Terminator for straight line, or S2k for twistys. Although, you better not be chunk like me or the S2k wont be comfy at all
Reply
Old Dec 30, 2011 | 05:13 PM
  #27  
number 8's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 749
Likes: 0
From: midwest
Originally Posted by boostedwrx
Mustang Terminator for straight line, or S2k for twistys. Although, you better not be chunk like me or the S2k wont be comfy at all
I was just going to say the Terminator. Which I'm guessing would take a 9, on slicks.
Reply
Old Dec 30, 2011 | 11:49 PM
  #28  
rongdoer's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 340
Likes: 2
From: northern virginia
Syclone. You'd get redneck points.
Reply
Old Dec 31, 2011 | 12:03 AM
  #29  
shake n' bake's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 11
Likes: 0
From: NW
Dodge Ram srt10, they don't handle for ish, but straight line pretty legit...
Reply
Old Jan 2, 2012 | 10:02 PM
  #30  
cs82685's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 488
Likes: 0
From: Phillipsburg, NJ
anyone mention cts-v yet?
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 01:06 AM.