dunno....Norris evo VII ....10.1s1/4th and does 0-100 in 5.99 seconds


Engine - Mitsubishi 4G63 4 Cylinder 16 Valve

Engine Dyno - 807 Hp & 647Lbft (2.2 Bar)
621.2 Hp At The Hubs (So Far)
548.7 LbFt At The Hubs (So Far)
Vehicle Weight 1440Kg (Dry With Driver) <--= 3168 lbs
0-60Mph - 2.79 So Far (Road Tyres)
0-100Mph - 5.99 So Far (Road Tyres)
1/4 Mile - 10.1 Secs @ 139 Mph
Top Speed - 202 Mph

all from here
http://web.norrisdesigns.com/Feature...t=1&id=1&cid=0


i gotta find thier videos of it on the dyno, sounds MEAN.

this for the top speed record?! what aspect exactly did you think an EVO modded beat a mclaren?!

 

No way.

If a Skyline GTR, heavily modded one, that is, can't beat a McLaren F1, what the hell makes you think the Evo would?

 

only the quad turbo W16Bugatti and the Koenigsegg CC can take on the McLaren GTR

 

Aerodynamics is a major factor here guys. The Evo just doesn't have as good of aerodynamics to allow top speeds of over 220mph.

 

There is a video of a Supra racing the F1 in the 1/4. Of course the Supra got raped.

 

wasn't there also a video of a yellow evo (?superlemon?) taking out a Suzuki Hayabusa? If that bike was ridden by a fairly competent person than a heavily modded Evo can certainly beat the McLaren - maybe not in a top speed run but up to a reasonable speed.
A Hayabusa does the 1/4 miles well below 10 seconds and unrestricted top speeds in excess of 200mph - all stock. for a nice comparison in same conditions check out Quarter Mile Rivals
-> McLaren is top in cars!!

 

Although Mister2Zx3 has posted this from his website and a stock Evo has beat the Mclaren in the skidpad and 0-60 Got figures of Evo from R&Track March 03 added in the Evo and figures

McLaren F1 Saleen S7 Ferrari Enzo Koenigsegg CC EVO VIII

Lateral Acceleration Around 200 ft Skidpad
0.86 G 0.99 G 1.01 G 1.15 G 0.97G

Braking : 60-0 mph
127 ft 125 ft 109 ft 105 ft 117ft
108ft C&D mag

 

WOW that stopping distance is amazing

 

mclaren...aytime anywhere

 

Lol...anyone taking the evo in a balanced selection of races would be a fool.

 

if you put as much money into the Evo as the McClarrin cost then you could beat it in the 1/4 but no way is an Evo EVER going to beat the top end/top speed of the McClarrin its just not ganna happen.

 

so what it comes down to is i can take a neon and $30k later ill out run a jet? sweet

 

for our next topic which is faster a lawn mower or the Venom Viper?

 

The ND Evo set a faster time just a few weeks ago. It now officially does a 0-60 time of 2.69 secs.

Can get more info at www.norrisdesigns.com

 

Depends if your typical Hennesey Venom Viper has as much of an off-the-line traction issue as a twin-turbo LPE C5 Corvette.

I've seen a blown LPE C5 (supercharged and bored out, not even the twin-turbo beast) and it needed 12" wide wheels, and DOT drag radials just to keep it reasonable. With traction additive I could see spin being minimized, but that beast was putting ~500 to the rear wheels and he still had to finesse it to prevent infinite wheelspin.