Calling owners of Evo's & STI's
#16
Evolved Member
iTrader: (20)
I could never for the life of me understand comparing the two. completely different set ups. completely different cars. The only thing they share in common is four door awd..hmm how many other cars can we compare that to..
when choosing a car the sti didn't even cross my mind because of how different it was. Not just aesthetically but the internal orientation was worlds apart. I feel like high school kids compare the two. Hence all the amateur YouTube videos. Most who compare them aren't familiar with either or have never even owned either car lol
when choosing a car the sti didn't even cross my mind because of how different it was. Not just aesthetically but the internal orientation was worlds apart. I feel like high school kids compare the two. Hence all the amateur YouTube videos. Most who compare them aren't familiar with either or have never even owned either car lol
The following users liked this post:
aaronhinch (Apr 17, 2017)
#17
EvoM Community Team Leader
iTrader: (60)
I could never for the life of me understand comparing the two. completely different set ups. completely different cars. The only thing they share in common is four door awd..hmm how many other cars can we compare that to..
when choosing a car the sti didn't even cross my mind because of how different it was. Not just aesthetically but the internal orientation was worlds apart. I feel like high school kids compare the two. Hence all the amateur YouTube videos. Most who compare them aren't familiar with either or have never even owned either car lol
when choosing a car the sti didn't even cross my mind because of how different it was. Not just aesthetically but the internal orientation was worlds apart. I feel like high school kids compare the two. Hence all the amateur YouTube videos. Most who compare them aren't familiar with either or have never even owned either car lol
Besides high schoolers comparing the two, so does Option as well as other magazines, t.v. shows, etc. They have always been in direct competition with each other.
The following users liked this post:
aaronhinch (Apr 17, 2017)
#18
Newbie
Thread Starter
Wow some many replies thank you all!
I was gonna try to reply individually to each comment but this has gotten a lot bigger response than I was expecting, so here are my overall comments for now:
I've compared the Evo to the STI because most tuner magazines that I've read and many internet car review sites have compared the two as apples to apples. To me, someone who has only driven an 06/07/16 STi and an Evo FE, I was trying to get a good baseline of comparison to something that I am familiar with.
Also, thank you to those who tried to get back to my initial few talking points from my first post... I did my best to frame this discussion around those few questions so that this wouldn't explode into a Subaru vs. Mitsubishi debate.
A few other things: I do like the exterior design of the hawkeye sti's but I like the Evo 9 more. I like the Evo interior much more than the gawdy blue sti interior.
My plan will be to buy an MR for the better DD'ability of the 6 speed. I am aware of this being the weaker trans, but I do not plan to ever exceed 400 tq.
I'm really liking what I'm hearing about the reliability aspect of the Evo. And yes, I've heard that working on the boxer motors is painstaking to say the least.
I was gonna try to reply individually to each comment but this has gotten a lot bigger response than I was expecting, so here are my overall comments for now:
I've compared the Evo to the STI because most tuner magazines that I've read and many internet car review sites have compared the two as apples to apples. To me, someone who has only driven an 06/07/16 STi and an Evo FE, I was trying to get a good baseline of comparison to something that I am familiar with.
Also, thank you to those who tried to get back to my initial few talking points from my first post... I did my best to frame this discussion around those few questions so that this wouldn't explode into a Subaru vs. Mitsubishi debate.
A few other things: I do like the exterior design of the hawkeye sti's but I like the Evo 9 more. I like the Evo interior much more than the gawdy blue sti interior.
My plan will be to buy an MR for the better DD'ability of the 6 speed. I am aware of this being the weaker trans, but I do not plan to ever exceed 400 tq.
I'm really liking what I'm hearing about the reliability aspect of the Evo. And yes, I've heard that working on the boxer motors is painstaking to say the least.
#19
Evolved Member
iTrader: (20)
OP is interested in both, so he has to compare to the two. Yes, there are other AWD cars, but he's not considering any of them. Besides high schoolers comparing the two, so does Option as well as other magazines, t.v. shows, etc. They have always been in direct competition with each other.
As for helping OP with his decision, I said this because I just don't know if OP has the impression that they're so similar that's the reason he narrowed it down to those two. I was just trying to tell him from my perspective having experienced both, that shouldn't be a reason for choosing between those two. As I think they're not worthy of a fair comparison.
#20
Newbie
Thread Starter
I get that they're compared by professionals too but I think it's because of the spotlight put onto the subject by so many people, most of which do not even own both platforms lol.
As for helping OP with his decision, I said this because I just don't know if OP has the impression that they're so similar that's the reason he narrowed it down to those two. I was just trying to tell him from my perspective having experienced both, that shouldn't be a reason for choosing between those two. As I think they're not worthy of a fair comparison.
As for helping OP with his decision, I said this because I just don't know if OP has the impression that they're so similar that's the reason he narrowed it down to those two. I was just trying to tell him from my perspective having experienced both, that shouldn't be a reason for choosing between those two. As I think they're not worthy of a fair comparison.
- I want a turbo car that I can enjoy driving as an "A to B"/DD car as well as a weekend fun run car
- I want an AWD car that can handle the Michigan winters since I will be living here for the foreseeable future (RWD daily is not something I want for this reason)
- I want a tuneable and customizable car that I can make my own since cars are my passion
- I want an aesthetically pleasing car- the Evo 9 and the hawkeye sti are ones that I like the look of
#21
EvoM Community Team Leader
iTrader: (60)
Wow some many replies thank you all!
I was gonna try to reply individually to each comment but this has gotten a lot bigger response than I was expecting, so here are my overall comments for now:
I've compared the Evo to the STI because most tuner magazines that I've read and many internet car review sites have compared the two as apples to apples. To me, someone who has only driven an 06/07/16 STi and an Evo FE, I was trying to get a good baseline of comparison to something that I am familiar with.
Also, thank you to those who tried to get back to my initial few talking points from my first post... I did my best to frame this discussion around those few questions so that this wouldn't explode into a Subaru vs. Mitsubishi debate.
A few other things: I do like the exterior design of the hawkeye sti's but I like the Evo 9 more. I like the Evo interior much more than the gawdy blue sti interior.
My plan will be to buy an MR for the better DD'ability of the 6 speed. I am aware of this being the weaker trans, but I do not plan to ever exceed 400 tq.
I'm really liking what I'm hearing about the reliability aspect of the Evo. And yes, I've heard that working on the boxer motors is painstaking to say the least.
I was gonna try to reply individually to each comment but this has gotten a lot bigger response than I was expecting, so here are my overall comments for now:
I've compared the Evo to the STI because most tuner magazines that I've read and many internet car review sites have compared the two as apples to apples. To me, someone who has only driven an 06/07/16 STi and an Evo FE, I was trying to get a good baseline of comparison to something that I am familiar with.
Also, thank you to those who tried to get back to my initial few talking points from my first post... I did my best to frame this discussion around those few questions so that this wouldn't explode into a Subaru vs. Mitsubishi debate.
A few other things: I do like the exterior design of the hawkeye sti's but I like the Evo 9 more. I like the Evo interior much more than the gawdy blue sti interior.
My plan will be to buy an MR for the better DD'ability of the 6 speed. I am aware of this being the weaker trans, but I do not plan to ever exceed 400 tq.
I'm really liking what I'm hearing about the reliability aspect of the Evo. And yes, I've heard that working on the boxer motors is painstaking to say the least.
the one thing I liked was doing the timing belt. Never have I had an easier time. It's all right in front of you and color coded.
other than that, I hated working on it lol
as for the mitsu 6spd, I don't know that it's better for dailying other than it shifts really smooth and you may like where the lever sits, compared to the 5. No real advantage that I can think of. I kept mine for those reasons and because I like the ratios (I track and autox).
I also kept my car at 350tq. Not sure I would run much more. 350 doesn't leave me feeling derived, though. It's plenty.
The following users liked this post:
aaronhinch (Apr 17, 2017)
#22
Newbie
Thread Starter
I found Subarus to be difficult to work on compared to inline fours. I got used to it, but was relieved to get back to an I4 when I bought another Evo.
the one thing I liked was doing the timing belt. Never have I had an easier time. It's all right in front of you and color coded.
other than that, I hated working on it lol
as for the mitsu 6spd, I don't know that it's better for dailying other than it shifts really smooth and you may like where the lever sits, compared to the 5. No real advantage that I can think of. I kept mine for those reasons and because I like the ratios (I track and autox).
I also kept my car at 350tq. Not sure I would run much more. 350 doesn't leave me feeling derived, though. It's plenty.
the one thing I liked was doing the timing belt. Never have I had an easier time. It's all right in front of you and color coded.
other than that, I hated working on it lol
as for the mitsu 6spd, I don't know that it's better for dailying other than it shifts really smooth and you may like where the lever sits, compared to the 5. No real advantage that I can think of. I kept mine for those reasons and because I like the ratios (I track and autox).
I also kept my car at 350tq. Not sure I would run much more. 350 doesn't leave me feeling derived, though. It's plenty.
#23
EvoM Community Team Leader
iTrader: (60)
I haven't looked in a while but I don't remember much difference in ratios between fifth gear in the 5 speed and 6th Gear in the 6. At Least not enough to justify that being the reason to use it. Six speed cars are rare, but on the bright side, you can pick up a 6-speed transmission and all the materials needed to swap it for about five to six hundred dollars.
Last edited by kaj; Apr 17, 2017 at 03:23 PM.
The following users liked this post:
aaronhinch (Apr 17, 2017)
#24
Evolved Member
iTrader: (19)
Stock vs. stock, the Evo has an edge as the steering is better and the engine holds more power reliably.
But if you are going to mod your car, all bets are off. The Evo and STI are both great platforms. Particularly, the 2008+ GR STI chassis makes a great starting point.
At the end of the day, pick the car that feels right to you. You can make either fast and reliable.
But if you are going to mod your car, all bets are off. The Evo and STI are both great platforms. Particularly, the 2008+ GR STI chassis makes a great starting point.
At the end of the day, pick the car that feels right to you. You can make either fast and reliable.
The following users liked this post:
aaronhinch (Apr 17, 2017)
#25
Newbie
Thread Starter
I haven't looked in a while but I don't remember much difference in ratios between fifth gear in the 5 speed and 6th Gear in the 6. At Least not enough to justify that being the reason to use it. Six speed cares are rare, but on the bright side, you can pick up a 6-speed transmission and all the materials needed to swap it for about five to six hundred dollars.
1st 2.785 2.909
2nd 1.950 1.944
3rd 1.444 1.434
4th 1.096 1.1
5th 0.761 0.868
6th XXXX 0.693
PLEASE PLEASE correct this next statement if I am looking at this incorrectly:
it looks to me that the MR will have slightly higher torque out of 1st gear (2.909 > 2.785), and the MR will have slightly lower RPM's at a fixed speed in 6th gear vs. the same fixed speed in 5th gear of the GSR (0.693 < 0.761). I mentioned first gear just so someone could correct me if I'm not understanding how to read these ratios.
Last edited by aaronhinch; Apr 17, 2017 at 01:41 PM. Reason: bad formatting. edit provides clarity
#26
Newbie
Thread Starter
Sorry the formatting is not very good. It looked better while I was typing it out. Hopefully everyone understands that the middle column is for the GSR (5-speed) and the far right column is for the MR (6-speed).
#27
Evolved Member
How much noise an Evo makes depends on your choice of exhaust. A 6-speed is not going to fix a bad choice of exhaust. A 5-speed is more bullet proof. I've driven from one coast to the other behind the 5-speed and no problems. So, I'd suggest looking for an Evo and not worry about the transmission. Just buy a 6-speed if you happen to stumble onto one.
The following users liked this post:
aaronhinch (Apr 17, 2017)
#28
Newbie
Thread Starter
How much noise an Evo makes depends on your choice of exhaust. A 6-speed is not going to fix a bad choice of exhaust. A 5-speed is more bullet proof. I've driven from one coast to the other behind the 5-speed and no problems. So, I'd suggest looking for an Evo and not worry about the transmission. Just buy a 6-speed if you happen to stumble onto one.
Do the 6-speeds still seem to be more prone to failure even in a lightly modded form (330-350 whp)? Or is it only failure prone when trying to push bigger power (400+)?
#30
Evolving Member
iTrader: (2)
From the previous few comments I'm becoming much more open to a 5-speed. So thank you! Both transmissions have their own pros and cons it seems, so at this point I think the 5 vs 6-speed won't have any bearing on which car I buy. It'll be which car is the most well maintained, most tastefully modded, and lowest miles- regardless of 5 or 6 speed.
Do the 6-speeds still seem to be more prone to failure even in a lightly modded form (330-350 whp)? Or is it only failure prone when trying to push bigger power (400+)?
Do the 6-speeds still seem to be more prone to failure even in a lightly modded form (330-350 whp)? Or is it only failure prone when trying to push bigger power (400+)?
The following users liked this post:
aaronhinch (Apr 17, 2017)