Midnight ride...
Newbie
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 7
Likes: 0
From: Herndon, VA
Originally posted by LancerOzRally35
well i wouldnt go dissing all saturns. My best friends finace (spelling?) has a saturn, and hers has an upgraded turbo, intercooler, new internals, a nice exhaust, and alot of other ****. No she doesnt have a tin foil spoiler, just a new hood and front bumper so the intercooler has more breathing to it and the engine. but she has hit low 13's in it liek it was nothing. So i just wanna say not all saturns are riced out and slow.
well i wouldnt go dissing all saturns. My best friends finace (spelling?) has a saturn, and hers has an upgraded turbo, intercooler, new internals, a nice exhaust, and alot of other ****. No she doesnt have a tin foil spoiler, just a new hood and front bumper so the intercooler has more breathing to it and the engine. but she has hit low 13's in it liek it was nothing. So i just wanna say not all saturns are riced out and slow.
Newbie
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 7
Likes: 0
From: Herndon, VA
Originally posted by Secret Chimp
"What a dumb****! Stupid saturn, racing is for real cars!!!! "
This coming from a guy who drives an MX-6! huhu...j/k!
"What a dumb****! Stupid saturn, racing is for real cars!!!! "
This coming from a guy who drives an MX-6! huhu...j/k!
you know i dont think i have ever seen an mx-6 at the track....wonder why?
Evolving Member
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 153
Likes: 0
Originally posted by Plastik Devil
lol
you know i dont think i have ever seen an mx-6 at the track....wonder why?
lol
you know i dont think i have ever seen an mx-6 at the track....wonder why?
Stock on stock, many MX6 owners have beaten 3000gt, eclipses, and mustangs. 6's aren't very modable, therefore, not very popular.
Last edited by veritech137; Jun 26, 2003 at 05:45 PM.
Evolving Member
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 153
Likes: 0
Originally posted by veritech137
hey man 160+ horses stock, so lick my *****.
Stock on stock, many MX6 owners have beaten 3000gt's, eclipses, and mustangs. 6's aren't very modable, therefore, not very popular.
hey man 160+ horses stock, so lick my *****.
Stock on stock, many MX6 owners have beaten 3000gt's, eclipses, and mustangs. 6's aren't very modable, therefore, not very popular.
If that Saturn was a "2" you probably would have lost. I have driven more Saturns than I can count. (Worked at the dealer)
The SL2 and SC2 is no slouch at 124HP. And they are not that heavy, I can't remember but it's like 2700 lbs or so.
Anyway, your trashing a car you know nothing about. They are pretty well built. Not to mention they are one of the most resonably priced cars out there for what you are getting.
Put me in a SC2 and I'll race you! And on a track too because you'd be suprised how well they can handle too.
Regardless, you won and no matter what the other car was, it would get bashed.
The SL2 and SC2 is no slouch at 124HP. And they are not that heavy, I can't remember but it's like 2700 lbs or so.
Anyway, your trashing a car you know nothing about. They are pretty well built. Not to mention they are one of the most resonably priced cars out there for what you are getting.
Put me in a SC2 and I'll race you! And on a track too because you'd be suprised how well they can handle too.
Regardless, you won and no matter what the other car was, it would get bashed.
Newbie
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 7
Likes: 0
From: Herndon, VA
Originally posted by veritech137
Did some research on 1/4 mile times
MX6: 15.7 sec. (1993)
SL2: 16.4 sec (1991)
Did some research on 1/4 mile times
MX6: 15.7 sec. (1993)
SL2: 16.4 sec (1991)
do some more research.
SL2: 15.9 sec (1996)
Newbie
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 7
Likes: 0
From: Herndon, VA
Originally posted by timzcat
Plastik Devil:
If you ever need to know anything about that car, just PM me.
I worked on them for 7 years!
Plastik Devil:
If you ever need to know anything about that car, just PM me.
I worked on them for 7 years!
Cheers
Newbie
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 7
Likes: 0
From: Herndon, VA
Originally posted by veritech137
the MX6 is still faster!!!!
the MX6 is still faster!!!!
MX-6: 160+
SL2: 124
oh yeah thats something to be proud of.
Evolving Member
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 153
Likes: 0
Originally posted by Plastik Devil
ok do you know how pathetic that sounds. The 6 is faster by 2 hundreth of a second, and has how much more horsepower???
MX-6: 160+
SL2: 124
oh yeah thats something to be proud of.
ok do you know how pathetic that sounds. The 6 is faster by 2 hundreth of a second, and has how much more horsepower???
MX-6: 160+
SL2: 124
oh yeah thats something to be proud of.
Man I did even more research, as you suggested, and I found that stock MX6's run 15.1's to 15.4's, aged 11 years. That is a difference of .8 to .5 sec over when yours was new. Thanks, I would have never known.
How old are you anyway?
Last edited by veritech137; Jun 27, 2003 at 05:57 PM.