Notices
Mid-Atlantic Region Includes DC, DE, MD, VA, WV.

Football Talkin Thread...

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 21, 2009 | 02:48 PM
  #1351  
Silver06evo9mr's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (47)
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 2,249
Likes: 0
From: Maryland
oh yea and there is word that Chirs McAlister is comming back to b-more?!?!
Reply
Old Dec 21, 2009 | 06:34 PM
  #1352  
Turbo01s2k's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (37)
 
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 296
Likes: 0
From: Bel Air MD
Originally Posted by Silver06evo9mr
dude your clueless. your stoolers have beeen around like 60 years. we have had a team what 13 now. of course your gunna have alot more history, wins and super bowls then us.

Your steal curtain is argueablly the "best defense of all time", yea and who is one of the other teams in that convo?? thats right the 2000 ravens (the other being the bears).

But still, none of that matters. Its what you do this year. And so far your team is pathetic. All that matters is wins, but if you break it down we have only been legitamitely beaten once maybe twice this year. We are about 5 plays/flags/field goals away from being 11-2 right now. WE also havnt lost crappy teams like you.

Oh and BTW, good luck next year cuz it looks like your locker room is falling apart. Sh*tsburg is officially rebuilding..
Well dave...your arguement about how long the ravens have been around vs the steelers basically hurts your arguement. Correct me if im wrong...but 6:60 is a better ratio than 1:13...so that just makes the ravens look worse. And while you make the D arguement about the ravens "2000" year...it hasnt happened again. For the most part...the steelers have a "solid" team each year...aka mostly pose a positive record. Ravens are all over the map.

All in all...its good to see the ravens make a playoff run. Im not a ravens fan, im not a steelers fan. Take it with a grain of salt.
Reply
Old Dec 21, 2009 | 06:49 PM
  #1353  
Lonnie@LMS's Avatar
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 228
Likes: 0
From: Randallstown MD
Originally Posted by Turbo01s2k
Well dave...your arguement about how long the ravens have been around vs the steelers basically hurts your arguement. Correct me if im wrong...but 6:60 is a better ratio than 1:13...so that just makes the ravens look worse. And while you make the D arguement about the ravens "2000" year...it hasnt happened again. For the most part...the steelers have a "solid" team each year...aka mostly pose a positive record. Ravens are all over the map.

All in all...its good to see the ravens make a playoff run. Im not a ravens fan, im not a steelers fan. Take it with a grain of salt.
Actually, your statement about the ratio is the bad argument. 6:60 means 1 superbowl for every 10 years average. 1:13 means that they have 7 more years to get their second ring. I think that is very possible with the team that is developing right now, unlike the steelers which seem to be desintegrating.
Reply
Old Dec 21, 2009 | 07:48 PM
  #1354  
evoll's Avatar
Newbie
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 62
Likes: 0
From: md
but the ravens used to be the browns so they have been around for a while lol and mr. elway schooled them a few times
Reply
Old Dec 22, 2009 | 04:16 AM
  #1355  
evo 8 ya's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (31)
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 2,318
Likes: 1
From: 39.800N 76.983W
Originally Posted by evoll
but the ravens used to be the browns so they have been around for a while lol and mr. elway schooled them a few times
....yeah we steal football teams, so what we also sell drugs and kill people.
Reply
Old Dec 22, 2009 | 05:19 AM
  #1356  
Silver06evo9mr's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (47)
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 2,249
Likes: 0
From: Maryland
Originally Posted by Lonnie@LMS
Actually, your statement about the ratio is the bad argument. 6:60 means 1 superbowl for every 10 years average. 1:13 means that they have 7 more years to get their second ring. I think that is very possible with the team that is developing right now, unlike the steelers which seem to be desintegrating.
thanks for explaining high school math to alex again. he should know best, he graduated last year... hell me and you have been out a while and we could do simple ratios

Originally Posted by evo 8 ya
....yeah we steal football teams, so what we also sell drugs and kill people.
lol top 5 best quote ever!
Reply
Old Dec 22, 2009 | 07:05 AM
  #1357  
meanmud's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (74)
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 2,758
Likes: 1
From: The 1st State
Steelers & Ravens

what's all the hub bub?? They both suck

As does most of the league
Reply
Old Dec 22, 2009 | 08:21 AM
  #1358  
Bobster22388's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (13)
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 936
Likes: 3
From: Marriottsville, MD
Originally Posted by meanmud
what's all the hub bub?? They both suck

As does most of the league
Your state doesn't even have football team are you a redskins fan....
Reply
Old Dec 22, 2009 | 09:02 AM
  #1359  
Turbo01s2k's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (37)
 
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 296
Likes: 0
From: Bel Air MD
Originally Posted by Lonnie@LMS
Actually, your statement about the ratio is the bad argument. 6:60 means 1 superbowl for every 10 years average. 1:13 means that they have 7 more years to get their second ring. I think that is very possible with the team that is developing right now, unlike the steelers which seem to be desintegrating.

LOL. How is it possibly a bad arguement when dave was simply talking, and stated that he was talking about NOW. So as of NOW, the ravens are behind. As you just said, 1 every 10 years is better than 1 in 13 years. It may be possible, but as of NOW, the ravens are behind.

Dont worry dave, i dont need help with math, you just need help with comprehension. Sure you can say they have 7 years, that means the steelers have 7 more years to get another ring also...that just puts them even further behind.

As said, im neither a ravens, or steelers fan....

-Alex
Reply
Old Dec 22, 2009 | 10:11 AM
  #1360  
Bobster22388's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (13)
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 936
Likes: 3
From: Marriottsville, MD
the squealers have only 2 super bowl wins in the last 30 years now. Ravens have been around for 13 years and already have 1 superbowl win. Sounds like a pretty good ratio to me for the Ravens
Reply
Old Dec 22, 2009 | 10:17 AM
  #1361  
TeStUdO's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 1,986
Likes: 41
From: Secret Tweaker Pad
That was the most embarrassing Skins loss since the Patriots back in '06. I can't take away anything good from that game.

I really just want to beat the Cowboys next week to knock them out of the playoffs and shut all the bandwagon douches that have never even been to Texas up around here.
Reply
Old Dec 22, 2009 | 12:38 PM
  #1362  
Lonnie@LMS's Avatar
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 228
Likes: 0
From: Randallstown MD
Originally Posted by Turbo01s2k
LOL. How is it possibly a bad arguement when dave was simply talking, and stated that he was talking about NOW. So as of NOW, the ravens are behind. As you just said, 1 every 10 years is better than 1 in 13 years. It may be possible, but as of NOW, the ravens are behind.

Dont worry dave, i dont need help with math, you just need help with comprehension. Sure you can say they have 7 years, that means the steelers have 7 more years to get another ring also...that just puts them even further behind.

As said, im neither a ravens, or steelers fan....

-Alex
Oh boy, for not being a Steelers fan you sure do go to bat for them. If you want to talk about NOW then Ravens 8-6, Steelers 7-7. The end.

I don't personally care to compare the football dynasty of the Steelers to the Ravens. It dosn't make sense to because there is no way to logically do it when they are vastly different ages. We just get a kick out of you Steelers supporters (since you are not a "fan" I will call you a supporter) that always bring up the 6 rings. The six wins in the superbowl (the most in the league) is a great reason for Steelers fans to justify their love of the Steelers but has nothing to do with what goes on from year to year. Your ratio reasoning is faulty because it proves nothing, there was a period from 1980-1996 when the Steelers didn't win any superbowls (16yrs for people bad at math). Does that now mean that the Steelers suck? No it dosn't so like I said, the ratio argument proves nothing.
Reply
Old Dec 22, 2009 | 02:40 PM
  #1363  
meanmud's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (74)
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 2,758
Likes: 1
From: The 1st State
Originally Posted by Bobster22388
Your state doesn't even have football team are you a redskins fan....
Either does your -

I'm from Philly - we're not that much better! We can play like a hopeful one week and lose to the Lions the next
Reply
Old Dec 22, 2009 | 04:02 PM
  #1364  
Turbo01s2k's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (37)
 
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 296
Likes: 0
From: Bel Air MD
You are simply being a classic ravens fan. The ravens are the best, end all be all, and there is no way for them to be worse than another team. Wether it be offense, or defense, or kicker, or safety, or left guard...the ravens are better.

I personally just like getting ravens fans fired up...because they make fools out of themselves most of the time. There are very few level-headed ravens fans...and thats a reason why im not a ravens fan.

Originally Posted by Lonnie@LMS
Oh boy, for not being a Steelers fan you sure do go to bat for them. If you want to talk about NOW then Ravens 8-6, Steelers 7-7. The end.

I don't personally care to compare the football dynasty of the Steelers to the Ravens. It dosn't make sense to because there is no way to logically do it when they are vastly different ages. We just get a kick out of you Steelers supporters (since you are not a "fan" I will call you a supporter) that always bring up the 6 rings. The six wins in the superbowl (the most in the league) is a great reason for Steelers fans to justify their love of the Steelers but has nothing to do with what goes on from year to year. Your ratio reasoning is faulty because it proves nothing, there was a period from 1980-1996 when the Steelers didn't win any superbowls (16yrs for people bad at math). Does that now mean that the Steelers suck? No it dosn't so like I said, the ratio argument proves nothing.
Reply
Old Dec 22, 2009 | 05:15 PM
  #1365  
Silver06evo9mr's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (47)
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 2,249
Likes: 0
From: Maryland
not even gunna argue...

on a side note the ravens picked up cory ivy for special teams and some one else off the jets practice squad (i think a safety)
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 09:34 AM.