Notices

NEWB EVO X MR TC-SST ?: GTR transmission compared to TC-SST?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jul 12, 2012, 08:48 AM
  #1  
Evolved Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (33)
 
SmurfZilla's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Raleigh, Transplanted from Toronto, Canada
Posts: 5,313
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
NEWB EVO X MR TC-SST ?: GTR transmission compared to TC-SST?

Just curious if anyone has driven both and what their impression of both is?

I'm thinking about selling my IX and getting something else. The EVO X platform is on the short list.
Old Jul 12, 2012, 09:57 AM
  #2  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (2)
 
sith_killer_99's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Fort Hood Texas
Posts: 698
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The TC-SST in the Evo X is nowhere near the same level at the GT-R transmission.

AMS has pushed the GT-R to 1,300 hp and currently has the world record of 233 mph at the Texas Mile.

The Evo X is much more limited. SSP and Dodson offer 600 hp clutch packs for the Evo X, but it's still limited by torque.

The problem seems to be related to the programming of the transmission which opens the clutch packs under heavy torque, it appears to be a safety feature of the transmission. There are people experimenting with the transmission programming, but it takes time.

For now, if you want to build a big hp Evo X, you are stuck with the GSR.

The TC-SST is a great transmission, but it's still limited.

Shep has a couple of great options for high hp Evo X GSR, they offer a 5 speed Evo X Dog Box for about $10K and a 6 speed Evo X Sequential Gear Box for around $20K, they also offer less expensive upgrade options to the standard 5 speed.

You will not find all those options with the TC-SST, the development is still in it's infancy compared to the GSR 5 speed and the GT-R transmission.

There are a ton of related threads in the forums, what I'm giving you is the quick an dirty.
Old Jul 12, 2012, 12:04 PM
  #3  
Evolved Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (33)
 
SmurfZilla's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Raleigh, Transplanted from Toronto, Canada
Posts: 5,313
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Not asking from a HP capable standpoint (Been there done that).

I'm asking from a response and capability standpoint for say 400-450hp.
Old Jul 12, 2012, 01:06 PM
  #4  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (2)
 
sith_killer_99's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Fort Hood Texas
Posts: 698
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by SmurfZilla
Not asking from a HP capable standpoint (Been there done that).

I'm asking from a response and capability standpoint for say 400-450hp.
Oh yes, it is capable, but your going to want to upgrade the transmission for that level of power. Check out this thread:

https://www.evolutionm.net/forums/ev...green-e85.html
Old Jul 13, 2012, 03:47 PM
  #5  
Evolving Member
 
Supraboy1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Allen
Posts: 465
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
. Thanks for the referral.
Old Jul 15, 2012, 12:33 PM
  #6  
EvoM Guru
iTrader: (8)
 
RazorLab's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Mid-Hudson, NY
Posts: 14,065
Received 1,038 Likes on 760 Posts
In Auto S-Sport mode, I actually think the SST is better than the GT-R.

I personally believe it's the best TC trans currently out, under 100k, if you compare auto mode.
Old Jul 15, 2012, 01:24 PM
  #7  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (2)
 
sith_killer_99's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Fort Hood Texas
Posts: 698
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Supraboy1
. Thanks for the referral.


Best TC-SST thread on the forums, I love the video and the car is sick!!!

I can't wait to catch up to you.
Old Jul 16, 2012, 08:54 AM
  #8  
Evolving Member
 
Supraboy1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Allen
Posts: 465
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by sith_killer_99


Best TC-SST thread on the forums, I love the video and the car is sick!!!

I can't wait to catch up to you.
Kewl, well come up for my Poker Run and I'll give ya a ride! ( ummm in the car. For you sick minded people out there.)

www.tinyurl.com/dallaspoker
Old Jul 20, 2012, 04:04 PM
  #9  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (13)
 
Vostok 7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Washington State
Posts: 676
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by SmurfZilla
Not asking from a HP capable standpoint (Been there done that).

I'm asking from a response and capability standpoint for say 400-450hp.
In that case, the TC-SST is way better. My dad has a GT-R and the tranny is good, but the TC-SST is almost spooky in how well it picks shift points in all modes.

A major difference is the TC-SST remembers and responds to multiple shift inputs, so if you click downshift twice, it will shift once, wait until the engine speed is appropriate, and then downshift again. The GT-R doesn't do this. General drivability is a little better too, Mitsubishi managed to tune out a lot of the bucking and stuff that dual-clutch transmissions are prone to, and it doesn't hammer through the shifts as hard either, while still being just as fast.
Old Aug 27, 2012, 05:59 AM
  #10  
Newbie
 
tons0torque's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 68
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The problem with the SST is software related. Mecanically this trans is awesome. Eventually we will have TCU control.
Old Aug 30, 2012, 07:03 AM
  #11  
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (1)
 
SSP Jeremy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Houston, Texas
Posts: 178
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by razorlab
In Auto S-Sport mode, I actually think the SST is better than the GT-R.

I personally believe it's the best TC trans currently out, under 100k, if you compare auto mode.

Completely agree.

I have a 500+ hp Evo X MR, and a 500+ hp GT-R. I've driven both of the cars extensively on the street and track and without a doubt the SST is much better in both applications.


.
Old Aug 31, 2012, 10:24 AM
  #12  
Newbie
iTrader: (5)
 
tonerockyhorror's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Bay Area
Posts: 16
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I had a GTR before moving to the Evo. The GTR tranny is obviously more robust, but with that comes more clunk/noise in its operation. As has been mentioned, the auto mode is infinitely better in the Evo especially when comparing normal modes.

I've been very impressed with the SST in the Evo thus far, especially for a car half the price.
Old Sep 2, 2012, 07:11 PM
  #13  
Evolving Member
iTrader: (1)
 
willyan1989's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Memphis
Posts: 152
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by SSP Jeremy
Completely agree.

I have a 500+ hp Evo X MR, and a 500+ hp GT-R. I've driven both of the cars extensively on the street and track and without a doubt the SST is much better in both applications.


.
Just wondering, does that mean your Evo x MR is faster as well?
Old Oct 6, 2012, 01:29 PM
  #14  
Evolving Member
iTrader: (8)
 
jojipoji's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Connecticut
Posts: 177
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I have both also and some of the info above is incorrect. The gtr will also wait and down shift multiple gears. However For everything from daily driving to tracking I would agree the evox mr tranny is superior although it doesn't obviously hold as much power. When you flash the gtr tranny however you can make it shift "better".

I couldn't imagine "downsizing" from a gtr to an Evo though even with the superior tranny.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
wrx_ua
Evo X Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain
2
Aug 27, 2015 08:59 PM
Solod_dima
Mitsubishi TC-SST Discussion
8
Jun 25, 2014 09:39 PM
Tuor
Mitsubishi TC-SST Discussion
17
Nov 21, 2011 05:09 PM
skiracer
Mitsubishi TC-SST Discussion
1
Dec 3, 2010 11:53 PM



Quick Reply: NEWB EVO X MR TC-SST ?: GTR transmission compared to TC-SST?



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 04:06 PM.