Notices
Motor Sports If you like rallying, road racing, autoxing, or track events, then this is the spot for you.

Best Wheel for ESP

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 26, 2005 | 11:50 AM
  #1  
wi_whoami's Avatar
Thread Starter
Newbie
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 55
Likes: 0
From: WI
Best Wheel for ESP

I am working on preparing my Evo for ESP this year. I would like to run either 17x9+ or 18x9+ wheels with the largest Hoosiers possible. Anyone like to suggest a wheel that works well (and is light and fairly cheap)? I would like to go with 285/30-18's if possible.

Thanks for any help.
Reply
Old Jan 26, 2005 | 12:42 PM
  #2  
Hooligan317's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 220
Likes: 0
From: Indianapolis, IN
Two of the most common 17x9's (I wouldn't suggest the 18's) are the 5Zigen FNO1R-C and the Enkei RPF1 but I highly doubt 285's are gonna fit, but I could be wrong.
Reply
Old Jan 26, 2005 | 12:44 PM
  #3  
evoPirate's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 668
Likes: 0
From: Thornton CO
5Zigen FN01R-C, Enkei RPF1's (16lbs in 17x9) those are the two lightest and cheapest rims I know of that'll fit our cars. I'm going with the RPF1's in ESP myself. I think either set could be had for well under 1000 a set. Tires.....well I'm still not sure myself
Reply
Old Jan 26, 2005 | 12:57 PM
  #4  
broeli's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (19)
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 1,803
Likes: 0
RPF1's are more expensive than fn01rc's. But the RPF1's are also lighter. Are you prepping for a National level SP Evo? If not, than running a 245 Hoosier or V710 will be enough tire at the local regional level and probably even divisional level. I have 17x8.5 RPF1's with 245/40 Hoosiers and used the stock wheels with 255/40 Victoracers which was enough to win two different regions in ESP.
If you are at the national level you may need 275's and a rim at least 9" wide (probably wider) but you will also have serious rubbing issues on the front inside fender lining and will need to roll the rear fenders. Do a search and you'll find a bunch of info.
There are several members on the board that have used the 285 and 275 at Nationals.
Reply
Old Jan 26, 2005 | 02:10 PM
  #5  
chrisw's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 2,217
Likes: 0
From: Santa Cruz
Originally Posted by broeli
RPF1's are more expensive than fn01rc's. But the RPF1's are also lighter. Are you prepping for a National level SP Evo? If not, than running a 245 Hoosier or V710 will be enough tire at the local regional level and probably even divisional level. I have 17x8.5 RPF1's with 245/40 Hoosiers and used the stock wheels with 255/40 Victoracers which was enough to win two different regions in ESP.
If you are at the national level you may need 275's and a rim at least 9" wide (probably wider) but you will also have serious rubbing issues on the front inside fender lining and will need to roll the rear fenders. Do a search and you'll find a bunch of info.
There are several members on the board that have used the 285 and 275 at Nationals.

I run a 17x9 rim with 275's mounted. The rubbing is not bad if you get the right offset (around +35mm).

basically you want to go with the lightest and widest rim you can afford.
Reply
Old Jan 26, 2005 | 02:14 PM
  #6  
Mhyrr's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 40
Likes: 0
From: WDCR SCCA
Your best answer for the 285/30-18 Hoosiers is an 18x10. Your best bet there is CCW: www.ccwheel.com A set will be around $1800-2000. I wouldn't advise running a 285/30 smaller than a 9.5 or 10.

The cheaper option is a 275/40 on a 17x9.
Reply
Old Jan 26, 2005 | 02:19 PM
  #7  
markdaddio's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 405
Likes: 0
Has anyone considered running a 17x9.5 with 275/40/17 in front, and a 17x8 with a 245/50/17 in the rear. The diameters are the same, and will allow the use of a stiffer front anti roll bar, and the clearance issues in the rear would be non existant. It only makes sense with a weight disrtribution of 60/40.

Mark Daddio
Reply
Old Jan 26, 2005 | 02:25 PM
  #8  
chrisw's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 2,217
Likes: 0
From: Santa Cruz
Mark,

I think someone tried that last year at one of the national or pro-solo events. Not sure how it turned out.

IMHO, it would be easier to overcome the weight distribution by properly balencing the suspension to your driving style
Reply
Old Jan 26, 2005 | 04:31 PM
  #9  
93esp's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 143
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by markdaddio
Has anyone considered running a 17x9.5 with 275/40/17 in front, and a 17x8 with a 245/50/17 in the rear. The diameters are the same, and will allow the use of a stiffer front anti roll bar, and the clearance issues in the rear would be non existant. It only makes sense with a weight disrtribution of 60/40.

Mark Daddio
I had the same thought last year and tested with 285's on the front and 245's on the rear. The viscous center limited slip was locking and unlocking constantly to keep the rear from spinning and that unsettled the car. Maybe it would work with the active center diff..... I'm planning to try something else for SM....

Eric

Last edited by 93esp; Jan 26, 2005 at 04:37 PM.
Reply
Old Jan 26, 2005 | 04:50 PM
  #10  
chronohunter's Avatar
EvoM Guru
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 1,767
Likes: 0
From: Boulder, Co.
Originally Posted by markdaddio
Has anyone considered running a 17x9.5 with 275/40/17 in front, and a 17x8 with a 245/50/17 in the rear. The diameters are the same, and will allow the use of a stiffer front anti roll bar, and the clearance issues in the rear would be non existant. It only makes sense with a weight disrtribution of 60/40.

Mark Daddio
I think it would be worth a back-to-back test. The diff won't know if the height is the same and the set-up may hopefully need to be changed to compansate (which is maybe why Eric didn't like it). As you know I would also like you to try a slightly taller rear tire. It's all worth testing IMHO
Reply
Old Jan 26, 2005 | 05:15 PM
  #11  
chrisw's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 2,217
Likes: 0
From: Santa Cruz
Originally Posted by 93esp
I had the same thought last year and tested with 285's on the front and 245's on the rear. The viscous center limited slip was locking and unlocking constantly to keep the rear from spinning and that unsettled the car. Maybe it would work with the active center diff..... I'm planning to try something else for SM....

Eric
Eric,

I am amazed that you didn't cook the viscous coupling.
Reply
Old Jan 26, 2005 | 06:01 PM
  #12  
93esp's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 143
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by chronohunter
I think it would be worth a back-to-back test. The diff won't know if the height is the same and the set-up may hopefully need to be changed to compansate (which is maybe why Eric didn't like it). As you know I would also like you to try a slightly taller rear tire. It's all worth testing IMHO
The lsd coupling will definitely know if the tire diameters are different. Different diameters will result in slip across the coupling and definitely toast it. Running larger diameter tires on the rear is a common 4wd truck trick but they don't run a center differential.

I am a big believer in the wider front tire setup (as my co-driver would attest...) and spent two days in Peru, IN testing the wider front tire back to back with an equal width setup. I changed the suspension settings (spring rates, swaybars, alignment, tire pressures, etc.) to try to make the wider front setup happy and finally concluded that the difference in grip was making the center viscous coupling unhappy.

Eric

Last edited by 93esp; Jan 26, 2005 at 06:04 PM.
Reply
Old Jan 26, 2005 | 06:02 PM
  #13  
93esp's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 143
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by chrisw
Eric,

I am amazed that you didn't cook the viscous coupling.
Yeah, the car would buck like a bronco as it tried to hook up in a straight line....
Reply
Old Jan 26, 2005 | 06:41 PM
  #14  
markdaddio's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 405
Likes: 0
Eric, What brand of tire, and what was the differnce in tire diameter. With Hoosiers, a 275/35/18, and a 245/40/18, are within a tenth of an inch in diameter. The diff should not even notice that I would think. By coincidence it is the rear tire that would have a slightly bigger diameter. It seems as though the 17's are not available in the autocross compound to do this with 17's. What do you think.

Thanks,
Mark

Last edited by markdaddio; Jan 26, 2005 at 06:45 PM.
Reply
Old Jan 26, 2005 | 07:17 PM
  #15  
chronohunter's Avatar
EvoM Guru
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 1,767
Likes: 0
From: Boulder, Co.
Originally Posted by 93esp
The lsd coupling will definitely know if the tire diameters are different. Different diameters will result in slip across the coupling and definitely toast it. Running larger diameter tires on the rear is a common 4wd truck trick but they don't run a center differential.

I am a big believer in the wider front tire setup (as my co-driver would attest...) and spent two days in Peru, IN testing the wider front tire back to back with an equal width setup. I changed the suspension settings (spring rates, swaybars, alignment, tire pressures, etc.) to try to make the wider front setup happy and finally concluded that the difference in grip was making the center viscous coupling unhappy.

Eric
Eric, the tires were the same diameter during the testing only the width was different?
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 05:15 PM.