UD/BD for Evo IX CBV to Evo VIII??
UD/BD for Evo IX CBV to Evo VIII??
The listing in the new 2006 rulebook looks a little funny regarding the Evo. I don't quite understand what Evo SD means. I would assume it should have been Evo NOC possibly.
Anyhow, is there any benefit to upgrading to the Evo IX compressor bypass valve? It is the "metal" one which is supposed to leak less than the "plastic" one in the Evo8.
Haven't seen this tackled on the forums yet.
John
Anyhow, is there any benefit to upgrading to the Evo IX compressor bypass valve? It is the "metal" one which is supposed to leak less than the "plastic" one in the Evo8.
Haven't seen this tackled on the forums yet.
John
It depends on how the EVO is classed.
To update backdate you need to make sure that the EVO8 and EVO 9 are classed on the same "line"
for instance, lets look at the Nissan classification for BSP
The 300zx Turbo has 2 lines in the classification. That implies that any 84-89 300z turbo can update/backdate parts. Any 300z turbo that was not produced from 84-89 cannot update/backdate to parts in the 84-89 range and vise versa.
This would allow us to update backdate
This would not let us update backdate
understand?
To update backdate you need to make sure that the EVO8 and EVO 9 are classed on the same "line"
Originally Posted by section 15.1.c
Equipment and/or specifications may be exchanged between
different years and models of a vehicle if (a) the item is standard
on the year/model from which it was taken, and (b) the years/
models are listed on the same line of Appendix A (Street Prepared
Classes). The updated/backdated part or the part to which
it is to be attached may not be altered, modified, machined or
otherwise changed to facilitate the updating/backdating allowance.
Standard factory installation methods, locations, and
configurations are allowed. The updating and/or backdating of engines, transmissions or transaxles must be done as a unit;
component parts of these units may not be interchanged. Cars
not listed in the Street Prepared sections of Appendix A may not
be updated/backdated until approved by the SEB and published
in SportsCar magazine.
different years and models of a vehicle if (a) the item is standard
on the year/model from which it was taken, and (b) the years/
models are listed on the same line of Appendix A (Street Prepared
Classes). The updated/backdated part or the part to which
it is to be attached may not be altered, modified, machined or
otherwise changed to facilitate the updating/backdating allowance.
Standard factory installation methods, locations, and
configurations are allowed. The updating and/or backdating of engines, transmissions or transaxles must be done as a unit;
component parts of these units may not be interchanged. Cars
not listed in the Street Prepared sections of Appendix A may not
be updated/backdated until approved by the SEB and published
in SportsCar magazine.
Originally Posted by Datsun/Nissan
240Z & 260Z & 280Z
280ZX non-turbo
280ZX turbo (’79-’83)
300ZX turbo (’84-’89)
300ZX turbo
280ZX non-turbo
280ZX turbo (’79-’83)
300ZX turbo (’84-’89)
300ZX turbo
This would allow us to update backdate
Originally Posted by Mitsubishi
Lancer Evo 8, EVO 9
3000GT Turbo
3000GT Turbo
Originally Posted by Mitsubishi
Lancer Evo 8
Lancer Evo 9
3000GT Turbo
Lancer Evo 9
3000GT Turbo
Last edited by chrisw; Dec 31, 2005 at 03:52 PM.
chrisw,
I understand how the cars have to be on the same line in the rule book. What I don't understand is how it is written in the 2006 online edition.
Evolution VIII ('03+)
Evo SD
"SD" is not listed in the abbreviations at the beginning of that Appendix. Anyone have any insight into this?
for reference the rules can be downloaded here
http://www.scca.com/Solo/Index.asp?IdS=0011C9-DF44420&x=050|070&~=
I understand how the cars have to be on the same line in the rule book. What I don't understand is how it is written in the 2006 online edition.
Evolution VIII ('03+)
Evo SD
"SD" is not listed in the abbreviations at the beginning of that Appendix. Anyone have any insight into this?
for reference the rules can be downloaded here
http://www.scca.com/Solo/Index.asp?IdS=0011C9-DF44420&x=050|070&~=
Originally Posted by kekek
chrisw,
I understand how the cars have to be on the same line in the rule book. What I don't understand is how it is written in the 2006 online edition.
Evolution VIII ('03+)
Evo SD
"SD" is not listed in the abbreviations at the beginning of that Appendix. Anyone have any insight into this?
for reference the rules can be downloaded here
http://www.scca.com/Solo/Index.asp?IdS=0011C9-DF44420&x=050|070&~=
I understand how the cars have to be on the same line in the rule book. What I don't understand is how it is written in the 2006 online edition.
Evolution VIII ('03+)
Evo SD
"SD" is not listed in the abbreviations at the beginning of that Appendix. Anyone have any insight into this?
for reference the rules can be downloaded here
http://www.scca.com/Solo/Index.asp?IdS=0011C9-DF44420&x=050|070&~=
ok...got a little update
It looks like the Evo (GSR & MR) will be listed on one line while the SD is supposed to be the RS. So UD/BD between GSR & MR is ok, but not ok with RS. And I think the listing will change to Lancer Evolution, which I believe will encompass the VIII and IX with the RS on its own line.
It'll probably be:
Lancer Evolution
Evo RS
So, anyone know who has Evo IX blow off valves for a good price? Are they worth it?
It looks like the Evo (GSR & MR) will be listed on one line while the SD is supposed to be the RS. So UD/BD between GSR & MR is ok, but not ok with RS. And I think the listing will change to Lancer Evolution, which I believe will encompass the VIII and IX with the RS on its own line.
It'll probably be:
Lancer Evolution
Evo RS
So, anyone know who has Evo IX blow off valves for a good price? Are they worth it?
Trending Topics
Originally Posted by whitet777
I'd take a 9 over a RS for autocross anyday.
Originally Posted by kekek
ok...got a little update
It looks like the Evo (GSR & MR) will be listed on one line while the SD is supposed to be the RS. So UD/BD between GSR & MR is ok, but not ok with RS. And I think the listing will change to Lancer Evolution, which I believe will encompass the VIII and IX with the RS on its own line.
It looks like the Evo (GSR & MR) will be listed on one line while the SD is supposed to be the RS. So UD/BD between GSR & MR is ok, but not ok with RS. And I think the listing will change to Lancer Evolution, which I believe will encompass the VIII and IX with the RS on its own line.
I just had an epiphany into how the SEB might be thinking...I bet the BSP BMW M3 LTW isn't on the same line as standard E36M3s. If so, they are equating the RS to the LTW now that they are in the same class.
Originally Posted by russjnco
I think I'd rather have the RS just because of the weight reduction but that's just my personal opinion.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
WTB[West]: ACD ECU EVO IX w/Bracket
Wanted EVO IX
For Sale/WTB - Engine / Drivetrain / Power
2
Oct 14, 2016 05:09 PM
[WTB] Stock Evo IX block
martinPL
For Sale/WTB - Engine / Drivetrain / Power
3
Jun 11, 2016 08:19 AM
[WTB] Evo ix bare block
blackgsx01
For Sale/WTB - Engine / Drivetrain / Power
2
Sep 4, 2014 08:18 PM
