Notices
Motor Sports If you like rallying, road racing, autoxing, or track events, then this is the spot for you.

PF97 pad cracks

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old May 30, 2007 | 12:43 PM
  #16  
WarmPepsi's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (35)
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 2,418
Likes: 1
From: Indianapolis, IN
i've run 30+ events.

not an issue.

Zip tie them away from the rotor, plain and simple.
Reply
Old May 30, 2007 | 12:51 PM
  #17  
redvolution's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 356
Likes: 0
From: NorCal
Originally Posted by WarmPepsi
i've run 30+ events.

not an issue.

Zip tie them away from the rotor, plain and simple.
On both Evo's ('03 and '05) I removed the dust shields immediately after break-in. Zip-tied the wires and no problems for me either with 25 or so track days.
Reply
Old May 31, 2007 | 08:37 AM
  #18  
cfdfireman1's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 4,165
Likes: 0
From: Chicago
There is no advantage to removing them so why do it?
Reply
Old May 31, 2007 | 08:43 AM
  #19  
DaWorstPlaya's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (31)
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 3,216
Likes: 7
From: Denver, CO
I think the general thought is it allows the heat on the rotors to dissipate faster ...
Reply
Old May 31, 2007 | 09:09 AM
  #20  
WarmPepsi's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (35)
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 2,418
Likes: 1
From: Indianapolis, IN
Originally Posted by cfdfireman1
There is no advantage to removing them so why do it?
exactly. More airflow to rotors = can't be bad.
Reply
Old May 31, 2007 | 09:53 AM
  #21  
RazorLab's Avatar
EvoM Guru
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 14,094
Likes: 1,092
From: Mid-Hudson, NY
Originally Posted by marksae
I've never seen cracks like these before on any of the other race pads I've tried. This is a first. My rotors are in better shape crackwise compared to these pads. hehe.. has anyone else experienced this type of pad cracking w/ this or any other pad?

Mark I get those on almost every pad I have used. I used to get them the most on the PF's pads though.

I've also had my dust shields off since the car had only 1200 miles on it. Zip tied the sensor wires to the hub. Have had no problems. I check the zip ties after every event and they still haven't melted.
Reply
Old May 31, 2007 | 10:11 AM
  #22  
WarmPepsi's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (35)
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 2,418
Likes: 1
From: Indianapolis, IN
since we're on pads, and i've heard PF isn't making the 97 in the rear anymore, whats everyone else running on the rears that is comperable to the 97, but with a little less initial bite?
Reply
Old May 31, 2007 | 11:43 AM
  #23  
Ludikraut's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (17)
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 6,224
Likes: 0
From: 41° 59' N, 87° 54' W
^ Great question, since I am also looking to go to a PF97 in the front. I managed to finally totally fry my HP+ pads on the last track day. Any thoughts on running PF97 in the front with HP+ in the rear?

I thought the PF97 had less initial bite, whereas the PF01s had more. I need to make sure that the PF97 has more initial bite than the HP+ rear pads. The last thing I need is to end up with any kind of rear brake bias...

l8r)
Reply
Old May 31, 2007 | 11:51 AM
  #24  
DaWorstPlaya's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (31)
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 3,216
Likes: 7
From: Denver, CO
I'm planning on doing a PF97 Front and Ferodo DS2500 Rear combo ... Any thing with less bite than the front should work ...
Reply
Old May 31, 2007 | 12:58 PM
  #25  
marksae's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 2,995
Likes: 1
From: SF, CA
I currently run the Hawk DTC60s in the rears. I previously had the DTC60s in the front and they definitely had more initial bite compared to the PF97s.
Reply
Old May 31, 2007 | 01:15 PM
  #26  
WarmPepsi's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (35)
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 2,418
Likes: 1
From: Indianapolis, IN
Originally Posted by marksae
I currently run the Hawk DTC60s in the rears. I previously had the DTC60s in the front and they definitely had more initial bite compared to the PF97s.
Erm, Less bite is what i'm looking for.

I may think about the ferrodo's though.
Reply
Old May 31, 2007 | 01:48 PM
  #27  
AutoMotoSports's Avatar
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (42)
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 6,132
Likes: 3
From: West Chicago, IL
Toss on a good brake cooling kit

Hint AMS Hint

Eric
Reply
Old May 31, 2007 | 04:00 PM
  #28  
redvolution's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 356
Likes: 0
From: NorCal
Originally Posted by WarmPepsi
Erm, Less bite is what i'm looking for.

I may think about the ferrodo's though.
Given that the stock Evo brake system is slightly forward biased, why would you (and everybody else it seems) want to use a rear pad with a lower MOT? Seems like the optimal setup would be same pad front/rear.
Reply
Old May 31, 2007 | 07:01 PM
  #29  
WarmPepsi's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (35)
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 2,418
Likes: 1
From: Indianapolis, IN
because if you give the rear more pad, you tend to lock the rears and light them up. Causes some serious issues when braking from high speed into a super low speed corner. (ie: sebring @ the safety pin)
Reply
Old Jun 1, 2007 | 05:52 AM
  #30  
cfdfireman1's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 4,165
Likes: 0
From: Chicago
did you test this?

Originally Posted by WarmPepsi
exactly. More airflow to rotors = can't be bad.
According to Performance Friction and their pyrometers there is no advantage.
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 01:55 PM.