new AUTOBON PRODCUCTIONS meet, DYNO DAY
hey i know i dont know you guys well but next week the sports car club of new hampshire is holding its last autox event of the year at NHIS i think it would be cool if some of you guyz came and help represent the EVO its oct 30th gates and signin are at 8am and its 35 dollars to enter
their web site is sccnhautox.tripod.com for more info and preregistration
their web site is sccnhautox.tripod.com for more info and preregistration
Originally Posted by avengerhed
A huge thanks to Autobon, TDC Tuning and John, who was a real cool guy!
It was nice seeing some familiar faces and meeting new people. And Derek - sorry about getting temporarily lost on the way home - I still don't trust the GPS as much as I should
.
.and BIG UPS to John.. evoM this is what uve been waiting for - a tuner thats actually nice!
Originally Posted by avengerhed
Anj - I made 275/278 peak, i think. As soon as I get the sheet from TDC I'll post it up.
I wanted to ask John what a stock Evo/STi puts down on his dyno but I forgot to
I wanted to ask John what a stock Evo/STi puts down on his dyno but I forgot to
Originally Posted by anjapower
Hmm...that's definitely 20-30whp lower than what I'd expect your car to put down on a Dynojet for sure. Who had the highest dynoing Evo of the day?
Last edited by avengerhed; Oct 24, 2005 at 08:12 AM.
Originally Posted by avengerhed
yeah, i did some reading on the Land and Sea "DYNOmite" Dyno and it seems as though they'll read lower than a mustang dyno. I haven't been able to get a straight answer as to relating DYNOmite numbers to dynojet or mustang dyno.
as for the highest evo, when I was there, there was an Evo with 280s that made ~325 .
as for the highest evo, when I was there, there was an Evo with 280s that made ~325 .
but it reads higher than a mustang
i have dynoed cars on Pruvens Dynojet and then dynoed here and they are within 5-6 hp
You cannot compare my Dyno to any other land and sea
i have spend 3 months getting the thing calibrated properly
and i have software noone else had (formulas and such)
FWD RWD, are all dead nut on to the local Dynojet.
AWD averages 20-30 hp more than a dyno dynamics (ktr)
You guys are all fooled by dyno jet standards
which are crap as it is
they have slip factors and a ton of other stuff built in to their software
that makes their # higher than everyone else
Dyno jets measure how fast you can accelerate a known mass and
then formulates TQ from the RPM signal
Think about it
those rollers weight 900++++ lbs
once spinning @ however fast they are going @6k rpm
it dosent take as much power to make them accelerate more
my dyno and others likeit
measure ACTUAL TORQUE @ the wheels
takes RPM and makes a HP #
my dyno runs are a simulated road load
so as you accelerate the load on the rollers increases just as it would when you are driving due to the mass of the car and wind resistance
Cool John. Thanks a lot for clearing that up. I had a hard time finding solid info (most was comparative dyno - to - dyno stuff) on the Land & Sea units. I had just found some stuff on the difference between an accelerometer and the DYNOmite.
Either way, thanks for the info...now that I have a baseline, I'll be able to actually assess the effect of future mods. Keep those dyno days coming!
Either way, thanks for the info...now that I have a baseline, I'll be able to actually assess the effect of future mods. Keep those dyno days coming!
Originally Posted by AutobonEvo
yeah next time ill bring a grill by the way sorry i fell threw on that, it was a little rough gettin up that morning and we realized we couldnt fit a grill into a evo ahaha.
+1 exactly its about 20-30 difference from the ktr dyno. If TDCs dyno read like a dynojet i would have been really pissed off about my results cus normally people with my mods are about 350. nicely calibrated
Originally Posted by TDC tuning
i hate to break it to you guys
but it reads higher than a mustang
i have dynoed cars on Pruvens Dynojet and then dynoed here and they are within 5-6 hp
You cannot compare my Dyno to any other land and sea
i have spend 3 months getting the thing calibrated properly
and i have software noone else had (formulas and such)
FWD RWD, are all dead nut on to the local Dynojet.
AWD averages 20-30 hp more than a dyno dynamics (ktr)
You guys are all fooled by dyno jet standards
which are crap as it is
they have slip factors and a ton of other stuff built in to their software
that makes their # higher than everyone else
Dyno jets measure how fast you can accelerate a known mass and
then formulates TQ from the RPM signal
Think about it
those rollers weight 900++++ lbs
once spinning @ however fast they are going @6k rpm
it dosent take as much power to make them accelerate more
my dyno and others likeit
measure ACTUAL TORQUE @ the wheels
takes RPM and makes a HP #
my dyno runs are a simulated road load
so as you accelerate the load on the rollers increases just as it would when you are driving due to the mass of the car and wind resistance
but it reads higher than a mustang
i have dynoed cars on Pruvens Dynojet and then dynoed here and they are within 5-6 hp
You cannot compare my Dyno to any other land and sea
i have spend 3 months getting the thing calibrated properly
and i have software noone else had (formulas and such)
FWD RWD, are all dead nut on to the local Dynojet.
AWD averages 20-30 hp more than a dyno dynamics (ktr)
You guys are all fooled by dyno jet standards
which are crap as it is
they have slip factors and a ton of other stuff built in to their software
that makes their # higher than everyone else
Dyno jets measure how fast you can accelerate a known mass and
then formulates TQ from the RPM signal
Think about it
those rollers weight 900++++ lbs
once spinning @ however fast they are going @6k rpm
it dosent take as much power to make them accelerate more
my dyno and others likeit
measure ACTUAL TORQUE @ the wheels
takes RPM and makes a HP #
my dyno runs are a simulated road load
so as you accelerate the load on the rollers increases just as it would when you are driving due to the mass of the car and wind resistance


