Notices
Northwest Region Includes AK, ID, WY, SD, MT, ND, CO.

Thank you English Racing!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 3, 2011 | 10:06 PM
  #16  
dude's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 591
Likes: 0
From: Farmington, NM
Is that torque drop intentional?

What BOV is this on? And are you running the perrin intake tube and filter, or just the filter?

My car has similar bolt ons and I'm debating about switching to SD, how's the driveability compared to MAF???
Reply
Old Apr 3, 2011 | 10:10 PM
  #17  
Lucas English's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 793
Likes: 10
From: Camas, WA
stock cams, intake and internal gated style turbo all make for combo that loses hp out the top.
Reply
Old Apr 3, 2011 | 10:21 PM
  #18  
Thrilla's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolving Member
Veteran: Army
iTrader: (47)
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 417
Likes: 3
From: Metro Detroit
Originally Posted by dude
Is that torque drop intentional?

What BOV is this on? And are you running the perrin intake tube and filter, or just the filter?

My car has similar bolt ons and I'm debating about switching to SD, how's the driveability compared to MAF???
The torque is essentially the same.
Cobb XLE BPV, recirculated
Samco intake (similar silicone intake as Perrin) + 3" ID Perrin filter
No earth shattering difference between MAF and SD with regards to driveability for me, as both felt smooth. I did get a 6 HP increase going to SD from MAF.
Reply
Old Apr 3, 2011 | 10:33 PM
  #19  
Lucas English's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 793
Likes: 10
From: Camas, WA
I meant intake manifold.
Reply
Old Apr 4, 2011 | 12:48 AM
  #20  
dude's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 591
Likes: 0
From: Farmington, NM
Originally Posted by Thrilla
The torque is essentially the same.
Cobb XLE BPV, recirculated
Samco intake (similar silicone intake as Perrin) + 3" ID Perrin filter
No earth shattering difference between MAF and SD with regards to driveability for me, as both felt smooth. I did get a 6 HP increase going to SD from MAF.
I should have been more specific, my fault. I was referring to the torque dip from 4400-5000 rpm. I didn't know if that was intentional to limit stress on the stock rods or transmission/clutch as it's close to the peak tq area. I absolutely understand the dropoff at higher rpms, especially with stock cams.

Nice numbers none-the-less, especially considering the limited mods! You are definitely maximizing the hp/dollar ratio. I like what English racing has done from their many dyno threads and will probably have them remote tune my evo once I install all the parts I've been accumulating over the winter...
Reply
Old Apr 4, 2011 | 01:22 AM
  #21  
JohnBradley's Avatar
Evolved Member
Shutterbug
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (30)
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 11,406
Likes: 78
From: Northwest
the dip at 4700 is an odd deal. Its not timing related as I added timing and it didnt go away. Its not boost pressure but I am thinking it has to be related to flow somehow, whether choke or something else.

aaron
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
glen villis
Evo X Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain
1
Oct 12, 2015 05:27 PM
DSMpsi
EvoM New Member / FAQs / EvoM Rules
10
Apr 7, 2012 09:24 PM
Weezheat
Evo X Engine Management / Tuning Forums
5
Dec 2, 2009 08:24 PM
ethompson
EvoM New Member / FAQs / EvoM Rules
15
Sep 25, 2007 06:45 PM
the evo wins
Evo Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain
10
Mar 16, 2004 12:09 AM




All times are GMT -7. The time now is 02:05 PM.