Notices

Oops....now in the right area

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 26, 2015 | 06:29 PM
  #16  
mRVRsport's Avatar
Evolved Member
 
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 2,740
Likes: 27
From: Out towards the countryside of Dallas, TX (USA)
Originally Posted by Brad_Hart
It's funny you mention that, because as I'm driving I really think it is getting better mpg than the O.Sport....I'll have to drive it more and see if that continues to be the case. Maybe the 9 speed auto handles my area (uphill, downhill, rarely flat) better than a cvt.

One thing about these CVTs is it takes awhile for it to "loosen up" to get you the expected MPGs; as compared to traditional trans. Keep a log and you'll see your O.Sport improve after you get pass 1,700 miles.
Reply
Old Apr 26, 2015 | 07:26 PM
  #17  
Brad_Hart's Avatar
Thread Starter
Newbie
 
Joined: Sep 2014
Posts: 29
Likes: 0
From: VA
I'm at 27k miles lol, my O.Sport doesn't do bad I just mean this may get better and thought transmission may be the reason because it does alot of shifting to stay in the perfect range of power and fuel efficiency....it's funny that cvts try to be like a geared transmission and this geared transmission seems to be trying to be like a cvt haha
Reply
Old Apr 27, 2015 | 11:57 AM
  #18  
Outlanders's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Feb 2013
Posts: 17
Likes: 0
From: Illinois
I like the way it looks, how do you like the amenities compared to the o.s. Like fast key , heated seats , etc.
Thanks
Reply
Old Apr 27, 2015 | 02:41 PM
  #19  
Brad_Hart's Avatar
Thread Starter
Newbie
 
Joined: Sep 2014
Posts: 29
Likes: 0
From: VA
It is different without the options but at the same time the extra power and the modern interior make up for the options...I really like the whole new design language so it just really depends on your taste
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
BuMpS
Lancer General
8
Mar 28, 2003 08:52 PM




All times are GMT -7. The time now is 11:26 AM.