Mark this thread as Unsold
FS: BB gt37R aka bb t67 $700 shipped!
FS: BB gt37R aka bb t67 $700 shipped!
T3 exhaust housing .82AR with 2.5" 4 bolt outlet.
S cover with 4" inlet and 2.5" outlet
Less than 1000 miles on the turbo just looking to go bigger, Asking $700 shipped.
Casey 801 541 5635


S cover with 4" inlet and 2.5" outlet
Less than 1000 miles on the turbo just looking to go bigger, Asking $700 shipped.
Casey 801 541 5635


Got a chart? And what motor / compression combination? Unless it's on 2.3 or 2.4 with pretty high compression or a V6, this is pretty much impossible for me to believe. My 2.0 didn't hit 35psi until 5800rpm with a 6262. So for you to spool a turbo that's bigger and doesn't have the billet wheels 600rpm sooner is pretty insane. A little more info would be great.
Trending Topics
How do you know I'm not interested? If you showed me proof of this, I might want it on my car. It would spool quicker meaning it would be more responsive on the street...and might make more power.
I'm not saying it is a **** match, but if someone asks for information, give them accurate information. That's my point. And if you don't have that information, then admit to not having it. Don't just make up some number that sounds good. I just decided to post information that will help people make the right decision since you obviously can't do that.
I'm not saying it is a **** match, but if someone asks for information, give them accurate information. That's my point. And if you don't have that information, then admit to not having it. Don't just make up some number that sounds good. I just decided to post information that will help people make the right decision since you obviously can't do that.
Last edited by BGevoIX; Feb 13, 2010 at 01:41 AM.
How do you know I'm not interested? If you showed me proof of this, I might want it on my car. It would spool quicker meaning it would be more responsive on the street...and might make more power.
I'm not saying it is a **** match, but if someone asks for information, give them accurate information. That's my point. And if you don't have that information, then admit to not having it. Don't just make up some number that sounds good. I just decided to post information that will help people make the right decision since you obviously can't do that.
I'm not saying it is a **** match, but if someone asks for information, give them accurate information. That's my point. And if you don't have that information, then admit to not having it. Don't just make up some number that sounds good. I just decided to post information that will help people make the right decision since you obviously can't do that.
I have all the info you would need.
I can post proof, have the ability too look at a log with dsmlink?
Bump for a nice turbo
I have this turbo in a .63 A/R with a built 2.0L. I get full boost of 40 psi at 6300 RPM. I would think with a .82 A/R expect full spool about 6500 at 40 psi. Keep in mind if you are running 25 psi you would get full boost sooner around 5800 rpm.
For those running 2.3L you will get full boost sooner than what I am posting.
Also my WHP numbers is on a mustang dyno I would read about 15% more hp on a dynojet so do the math. I would say with a .82 hotside you can expect about 30 more WHP but keep in mind you are giving up spool to get that up top. I hope this helps...
I have this turbo in a .63 A/R with a built 2.0L. I get full boost of 40 psi at 6300 RPM. I would think with a .82 A/R expect full spool about 6500 at 40 psi. Keep in mind if you are running 25 psi you would get full boost sooner around 5800 rpm.
For those running 2.3L you will get full boost sooner than what I am posting.
Also my WHP numbers is on a mustang dyno I would read about 15% more hp on a dynojet so do the math. I would say with a .82 hotside you can expect about 30 more WHP but keep in mind you are giving up spool to get that up top. I hope this helps...
Last edited by Street gear; Feb 14, 2010 at 01:54 AM.
That's why I would stay with a 6262. I am also on a Mustang Dyno. I am on a 2.0 with the 6262. At 36ps I made 620. If you add another 30whp on your hp figures, you would be at 675whp. My car made 15whp more on the last lb of boost that was added to the tune. So going off that math, if I added 4 more psi of boost to equal your 40psi, I would have to add in 60 more whp...which would put me at 680whp. And I get that boost about 500rpm sooner. Not that's not a lot of lag if you are down around 4k or so, but where we are, I will take the spool up all day considering I am making close to the same power.
However, to get back on topic, I feel that this turbo with a 2.3, 2.4 or a destroked 2.1 revving to 10k rpm would be awesome. The stroker would get you a little quicker spool, and the destroker revs so high that you need something this big anyway! Even if the 2.1 didn't spool until 6500rpm, it would still have a 3k+ rpm peak to peak power band!
I don't have a way to view anything from DSMlink.
However, to get back on topic, I feel that this turbo with a 2.3, 2.4 or a destroked 2.1 revving to 10k rpm would be awesome. The stroker would get you a little quicker spool, and the destroker revs so high that you need something this big anyway! Even if the 2.1 didn't spool until 6500rpm, it would still have a 3k+ rpm peak to peak power band!
I don't have a way to view anything from DSMlink.
That's why I would stay with a 6262. I am also on a Mustang Dyno. I am on a 2.0 with the 6262. At 36ps I made 620. If you add another 30whp on your hp figures, you would be at 675whp. My car made 15whp more on the last lb of boost that was added to the tune. So going off that math, if I added 4 more psi of boost to equal your 40psi, I would have to add in 60 more whp...which would put me at 680whp. And I get that boost about 500rpm sooner. Not that's not a lot of lag if you are down around 4k or so, but where we are, I will take the spool up all day considering I am making close to the same power.
However, to get back on topic, I feel that this turbo with a 2.3, 2.4 or a destroked 2.1 revving to 10k rpm would be awesome. The stroker would get you a little quicker spool, and the destroker revs so high that you need something this big anyway! Even if the 2.1 didn't spool until 6500rpm, it would still have a 3k+ rpm peak to peak power band!
I don't have a way to view anything from DSMlink.
However, to get back on topic, I feel that this turbo with a 2.3, 2.4 or a destroked 2.1 revving to 10k rpm would be awesome. The stroker would get you a little quicker spool, and the destroker revs so high that you need something this big anyway! Even if the 2.1 didn't spool until 6500rpm, it would still have a 3k+ rpm peak to peak power band!
I don't have a way to view anything from DSMlink.

The 37r is a good turbo and so is the 6262. I would not hesitate to recommend this turbo. More spool does not always lead to better ET's especially if traction is an issue. The T67 has a nice ramp up although the 6262 does spool quicker. As far as which turbo offers more power it's a toss. I think there is another 25 WHP (possibly another 40-50 WHP a .82 A/R) on my setup and will return to the dyno soon to confirm. I want to correct my information posted at 39.5 lbs I made 646.5 and at 37 Lbs. I made 641 WHP. We ran out of fuel up top going to 12.6 AFR so I had to shut it down. Also I had the stock throttle body. I have ordered some ID2200's and have installed a Boomba TB. The reason why there was not much difference between 37 PSI and 39.5 was timing. I believe I could have used a little more timing but as stated the party came to an end due to lack of fuel. I will be back to the dyno soon to see how much more there is in this turbo.
In conclusion if you have a 6262 keep it and if you have a 37r I would not sell it to buy a 6262. BTW there are lots of options that remain for this turbo such as the FP HTA 88 upgrade making it a billet compressor for around $500
Last edited by Street gear; Feb 15, 2010 at 09:31 AM.


