Notices
Evo Tires / Wheels / Brakes / Suspension Discuss everything that helps make your car start and stop to the best of it's abilities.

Tire / Wheel Fitment Questions

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 12, 2017 | 03:15 PM
  #3526  
kaj's Avatar
kaj
EvoM Community Team Leader
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (60)
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 13,632
Likes: 824
From: Fresno, CA
Originally Posted by MinusPrevious
Its the +18 that gives that set up the poke. Im running a +30 which is almost 1/2" difference inboard.

If you look at my car from the rear, you see the 275" width, but its all tucked under fender

If you have other questions, let me know (is there a front spacer being used on your setup?)
which wheel are you using? i'd love to run a 9.5 wheel without a spacer and only have to do minimum fitment mods. I had to use a spacer on the front for my RPFs but prefer not to.
Reply
Old Nov 12, 2017 | 03:21 PM
  #3527  
MinusPrevious's Avatar
EvoM Staff Alumni
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 7,704
Likes: 1,387
From: So.Cal
Originally Posted by kaj
which wheel are you using? i'd love to run a 9.5 wheel without a spacer and only have to do minimum fitment mods. I had to use a spacer on the front for my RPFs but prefer not to.
Using the poormans Rota P45R 17x9.5 +30 on the street & the Advan RGII 17x9 +29 on the track (no spacers for either wheel)

Joe
Reply
Old Nov 12, 2017 | 04:12 PM
  #3528  
kaj's Avatar
kaj
EvoM Community Team Leader
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (60)
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 13,632
Likes: 824
From: Fresno, CA
I've tracked Rotas. Maybe not the lightest wheel, but I had no problems. I'd rather have a Rota than a spacer. The Advan would be fine.. but kinda narrow for a 275 tire.
Reply
Old Nov 12, 2017 | 05:34 PM
  #3529  
MinusPrevious's Avatar
EvoM Staff Alumni
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 7,704
Likes: 1,387
From: So.Cal
Originally Posted by kaj
I've tracked Rotas. Maybe not the lightest wheel, but I had no problems. I'd rather have a Rota than a spacer. The Advan would be fine.. but kinda narrow for a 275 tire.
On the street, I ran the Nitto NT05 275's on the Advan's & it was just fine. The side wall was just about square w/the wheel. On the track, I ran the 255/40 Nitto NT01's on them

The Advans weigh approx 16.9lbs. The Rota's are over 20, but have worked very well on the street. Powder coating them was like adding a tuxedo & giving them a much richer look
Reply
Old Nov 12, 2017 | 08:58 PM
  #3530  
kaj's Avatar
kaj
EvoM Community Team Leader
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (60)
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 13,632
Likes: 824
From: Fresno, CA
Originally Posted by MinusPrevious
On the street, I ran the Nitto NT05 275's on the Advan's & it was just fine. The side wall was just about square w/the wheel. On the track, I ran the 255/40 Nitto NT01's on them

The Advans weigh approx 16.9lbs. The Rota's are over 20, but have worked very well on the street. Powder coating them was like adding a tuxedo & giving them a much richer look
LOL I hear that. Well... a 255 nitto is what I'd want to run. It's wide for a 255. Fit fine on the Advans, then?
Reply
Old Nov 14, 2017 | 08:19 AM
  #3531  
Driv200's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 739
Likes: 55
From: Oklahoma
Anyone know what offset is needed to clear inner coilovers and lower control arms for:
* 17x12 rim
* 335/35 tire
* Widebody kit will handle the outer demensions

Currently have 17x10 +38offset with 295/35. Works perfect. Spacers up front.

If do a widebody, trying to figure out what works.
Reply
Old Nov 14, 2017 | 08:35 AM
  #3532  
MinusPrevious's Avatar
EvoM Staff Alumni
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 7,704
Likes: 1,387
From: So.Cal
^^^17x12. That is an over fender spec for sure. You must be AX'ing

I think the answer posted in the Comp forum just about summed it up. Anything over a 10" wide wheel involves serious rear fender body work (i.e. overfenders)

Originally Posted by EVOizmm
10.5 with 315 is very hard unless you start cutting and pulling the fenders a bit. if you like your stock body stay with 10in wide and 295 max.

don't NEED wisefab to make 315's fit. the trailing arm is the only part really needed. from there its just cutting and getting your offset just right.

Reply
Old Nov 15, 2017 | 09:18 AM
  #3533  
kyoo's Avatar
Evolved Member
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (29)
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 10,828
Likes: 282
From: US
can i run 18x9.5 +22 (ce28sl...) on my evo without needing much modification? I have rolled the rears, would run 265/35-18 which, total diameter wise, is actually almost identical to stock 235/45-17. was the rear tab that people need to shave though?
Reply
Old Nov 15, 2017 | 09:29 AM
  #3534  
MinusPrevious's Avatar
EvoM Staff Alumni
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 7,704
Likes: 1,387
From: So.Cal
Originally Posted by kyoo
can i run 18x9.5 +22 (ce28sl...) on my evo without needing much modification? I have rolled the rears, would run 265/35-18 which, total diameter wise, is actually almost identical to stock 235/45-17. was the rear tab that people need to shave though?
Hi Sam

Heres an overlay of your spec vs what I run. Keep in mind, I had to rear roll, pull & do the bumper bolt relocate to get this to fit w/out any rub (also running -1.9 degrees of rear camber)





Your proposal is 8mm further outboard (.314" diff)

If this is just a show fit, they I would say, go for it, but if you plan on aggressive driving I would say this is way too aggressive

Let me know if you have questions

Joe
Reply
Old Nov 15, 2017 | 09:35 AM
  #3535  
kyoo's Avatar
Evolved Member
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (29)
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 10,828
Likes: 282
From: US
Originally Posted by MinusPrevious
Hi Sam

Heres an overlay of your spec vs what I run. Keep in mind, I had to rear roll, pull & do the bumper bolt relocate to get this to fit w/out any rub (also running -1.9 degrees of rear camber)





Your proposal is 8mm further outboard (.314" diff)

If this is just a show fit, they I would say, go for it, but if you plan on aggressive driving I would say this is way too aggressive

Let me know if you have questions

Joe
thx Joe - can you help me understand again why the rear bumper thing is needed, if the overall diamater of the tire is the same as stock? does it shift the position of the wheel backward? or just out enough that it's in contact with the bolt, which it wouldn't have been before?

i'd really liek to run the +35 ce28sl's, but i don't know about the clearance to the caliper. theoretically the X caliper should clear but it's still a risk to take. as you know I autocross so it's probably the most aggressive of aggressive driving
Reply
Old Nov 15, 2017 | 09:50 AM
  #3536  
MinusPrevious's Avatar
EvoM Staff Alumni
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 7,704
Likes: 1,387
From: So.Cal
Originally Posted by kyoo
thx Joe - can you help me understand again why the rear bumper thing is needed, if the overall diamater of the tire is the same as stock? does it shift the position of the wheel backward? or just out enough that it's in contact with the bolt, which it wouldn't have been before?

i'd really liek to run the +35 ce28sl's, but i don't know about the clearance to the caliper. theoretically the X caliper should clear but it's still a risk to take. as you know I autocross so it's probably the most aggressive of aggressive driving
It has to do w/the offset. The shallower we go (more outboard) the tire gets in the way of the bumper bolt
Heres the mod here:

Reply
Old Nov 15, 2017 | 10:15 AM
  #3537  
kyoo's Avatar
Evolved Member
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (29)
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 10,828
Likes: 282
From: US
any idea if the CE28SL in +35 will clear instead..? i think it's way too close for 9 calipers but may be ok for X calipers
Reply
Old Nov 15, 2017 | 10:25 AM
  #3538  
MinusPrevious's Avatar
EvoM Staff Alumni
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 7,704
Likes: 1,387
From: So.Cal
Originally Posted by kyoo
any idea if the CE28SL in +35 will clear instead..? i think it's way too close for 9 calipers but may be ok for X calipers
Not sure Sam. I searched that size /offset but did not get a hit. If it fits the X it should fit the 9?

But the +35 is a huge help in fitment. You can do w/out the rear roll & maybe the bumper bolt move
Reply
Old Nov 15, 2017 | 10:27 AM
  #3539  
kyoo's Avatar
Evolved Member
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (29)
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 10,828
Likes: 282
From: US
Originally Posted by MinusPrevious
Not sure Sam. I searched that size /offset but did not get a hit. If it fits the X it should fit the 9?

But the +35 is a huge help in fitment. You can do w/out the rear roll & maybe the bumper bolt move
thanks bud, that's what i'm thinking.

the weds tc105n in 18x9.5 +35 will clear the evo x brakes, but i guess all wheels are different. but yea if it fits the x it should fit the 9 (w X brakes). the modification doesn't change the position of the caliper but i think the x caliper is pushed out nonetheless.

i already have the rear roll but not the bumper bolt. and yea 265/35-18 isn't too crazy as far as tire width. i'm running 255/40-17 on my 17x9.5 +38 or w/e right now, they fit fine

Last edited by kyoo; Nov 15, 2017 at 10:48 AM.
Reply
Old Nov 15, 2017 | 02:10 PM
  #3540  
kyoo's Avatar
Evolved Member
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (29)
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 10,828
Likes: 282
From: US
joe,

how much does going to +28 help? seems to be a common size for the non-sl (ce28n) size wheels
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 05:05 PM.