Notices
Evo Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain Everything from engine management to the best clutch and flywheel.

JMFab o2 Dump

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 5, 2008 | 02:55 AM
  #31  
jxs1984's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (17)
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 456
Likes: 0
From: NY
Originally Posted by MitsuJDM
Yeah their site says they ship in 3-5 days business days.

I see you have the EPM in your sig. Just out of curiosity, why are you changing to the JMFab? Fitment?
yes i have fitment issue... i dont like the idea of the dump tube touching my licp coupler that connects to the j-pipe. epm offered me their version 2 but i didnt want to go through all the trouble if it doesnt fit.

heres a pic JM sent me through email:

Reply
Old Dec 5, 2008 | 02:57 AM
  #32  
jxs1984's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (17)
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 456
Likes: 0
From: NY
holy cow... didnt realize the pic was huge. oh well.
Reply
Old Dec 5, 2008 | 06:59 AM
  #33  
CBRD's Avatar
Account Disabled
iTrader: (60)
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 7,363
Likes: 8
From: york, pa 17402
love me sme JM fab parts

cb
Reply
Old Dec 5, 2008 | 07:03 AM
  #34  
Shearer's Avatar
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 526
Likes: 0
From: Cleveland, Oh
Originally Posted by bomjoon
The larger Turbine tube on the design is where they saw the huge increase in power gains. they do neck down to 2.5 inches because EVERY single downpipe necks down to 2.5 inches at the O2 Housing flange. It is a fact, so they had to go down to 2.5 inches unless they built their own downpipe to sell with their O2 Dump. That would not have been cost effective for the end user/buyer, for everyone that bought the product to also Have to purchase a new downpipe.

The JMFab design has a straight turbine tube, take a look at it, the differences with EPM design is that EPM turbine tube has a unique 3 inch CLRadius which to the eye is a super smooth bend. Unlike JMFab's staright turbine tube, in that the exhuast gases Slam into the back wall of their turbine tube.
If the 3" tube is welded straight to the flange with a 2.5" diameter outlet there is no necking down. It would be an abrupt transition and flow very poorly. Can someone verify this?

The JM Fab piece uses a 2.5" tube straight through. While not as big of a diameter it has one continuous diameter and no abrupt transitions. This makes more sense to me and is how I would build them.

There is nothing unique about 3" on 3" CLR tube. We've been using them for years on our exhaust pieces.
Reply
Old Dec 5, 2008 | 07:34 AM
  #35  
CBRD's Avatar
Account Disabled
iTrader: (60)
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 7,363
Likes: 8
From: york, pa 17402
Originally Posted by Shearer
If the 3" tube is welded straight to the flange with a 2.5" diameter outlet there is no necking down. It would be an abrupt transition and flow very poorly. Can someone verify this?

The JM Fab piece uses a 2.5" tube straight through. While not as big of a diameter it has one continuous diameter and no abrupt transitions. This makes more sense to me and is how I would build them.

There is nothing unique about 3" on 3" CLR tube. We've been using them for years on our exhaust pieces.
i love jm's design.

cb
Reply
Old Dec 5, 2008 | 08:03 AM
  #36  
TouringBubble's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 2,639
Likes: 3
From: Chelsea, AL
There is a transition from the 3" pipe to the flange on the EPM part, but there is a lip on the inside of the flange as Chad stated. The transition doesn't reduce the size all the way down to 2.5" as it is on a bias. I believe 2 different full 2.5" designs were tested and both made less power than the final 3" design that was decided upon.

I agree that a lip on the inside of the lower flange is not ideal, however testing showed that it did not influence the performance of the part. It's simply one of the compromises made due to clearance and 3rd party DP compatibility.

I hope this helps clear up some questions.

Last edited by TouringBubble; Dec 5, 2008 at 08:10 AM.
Reply
Old Dec 5, 2008 | 09:03 AM
  #37  
AlwaysinBoost's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (17)
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 3,275
Likes: 0
From: In da streetz
the quality that comes out of JM Fabrications is top notch.
I've used their parts/services on every car I've modified so far and have never had an issue with either.
Reply
Old Dec 5, 2008 | 09:12 AM
  #38  
CBRD's Avatar
Account Disabled
iTrader: (60)
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 7,363
Likes: 8
From: york, pa 17402
Originally Posted by AlwaysinBoost
the quality that comes out of JM Fabrications is top notch.
I've used their parts/services on every car I've modified so far and have never had an issue with either.
we work with jmfab because their craftsmanship is amazing, their parts fit, their business ethics are top notch... they are just the entire package.

cb
Reply
Old Dec 5, 2008 | 09:13 AM
  #39  
CBRD_Caleb's Avatar
Account Disabled
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 365
Likes: 0
From: Lancaster PA
JMF = top notch guys!
Reply
Old Dec 5, 2008 | 09:17 AM
  #40  
CBRD's Avatar
Account Disabled
iTrader: (60)
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 7,363
Likes: 8
From: york, pa 17402
one other thing,

with competitors parts we have seen a leak between the two sides of the turbo, the WG port side and the turbine outlet...

or they supply a crappy gasket that doesnt seal or some spray... at idle they leak through the dump tube, basically an exhaust leak..

these dont...

food for thought.

cb
Reply
Old Dec 5, 2008 | 09:30 AM
  #41  
bomjoon's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 270
Likes: 0
From: GA/AL
Originally Posted by CBRD_Caleb
JMF = top notch guys!

lol think you said you loved them enough?

like i said i'll do a comparison soon when i get my hands on them.

looks like we got some jmfab fanboys.
and some to EPM.

no need for fights when both had not been tested to confirm what makes more power.
Reply
Old Dec 5, 2008 | 09:34 AM
  #42  
Shacochis06's Avatar
Account Disabled
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 1,206
Likes: 0
From: Bel Air, MD
JM FAB doesnt get the credit they deserve and seem to get overlooked at times....i know i would have went with this design instead of a competitors if i had known at the time......o and there stock turbo ex mani is badass
Reply
Old Dec 5, 2008 | 09:37 AM
  #43  
bomjoon's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 270
Likes: 0
From: GA/AL
how much is teh jm piece?
Reply
Old Dec 5, 2008 | 09:38 AM
  #44  
91TSiGuy's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 131
Likes: 0
From: Ephrata, PA
Thanks guys. We appreciate the positive comments and loyalty you all show.

Reply
Old Dec 5, 2008 | 09:54 AM
  #45  
CBRD's Avatar
Account Disabled
iTrader: (60)
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 7,363
Likes: 8
From: york, pa 17402
Originally Posted by bomjoon
lol think you said you loved them enough?

like i said i'll do a comparison soon when i get my hands on them.

looks like we got some jmfab fanboys.
and some to EPM.

no need for fights when both had not been tested to confirm what makes more power.
my position based on fitment alone, we have had issues with the others, not with JMFab...

if you a preference by all means, make ur choice... but, we do quite a few evos and tend to know what fits and what doesnt...

cb
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 03:37 AM.