Moderators CANNOT moderate...
Thread Starter
Evolving Member
iTrader: (2)
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 227
Likes: 0
From: Twin Cities, MN
Moderators CANNOT moderate...
Originally posted by timzcat
You know what Gonzo, I AGREE with you. Imagine what it is like to try and clean this crap up all the time and only turn around and see another thread that is the same thing. This is the whole reason I am not touching this thread. If I kill it, there will only be another. If I warn someone they will only cry about it in Site suggestions and feedback. You can't win. It's the same people every time. This was Buschur's thread and therefore everyone who is not adding to it should have stayed out of it.
This whole problem will require some rule changes and/or stern action which I have no input to, so for now I am staying out of it.
You know what Gonzo, I AGREE with you. Imagine what it is like to try and clean this crap up all the time and only turn around and see another thread that is the same thing. This is the whole reason I am not touching this thread. If I kill it, there will only be another. If I warn someone they will only cry about it in Site suggestions and feedback. You can't win. It's the same people every time. This was Buschur's thread and therefore everyone who is not adding to it should have stayed out of it.
This whole problem will require some rule changes and/or stern action which I have no input to, so for now I am staying out of it.
I added the bold. Moderators cannot moderate. Sad Mark, really, REALLY SAD!
Re: Moderators CANNOT moderate...
Originally posted by vr430
and timzcat is one of the best from what I have seen...
I added the bold. Moderators cannot moderate. Sad Mark, really, REALLY SAD!
and timzcat is one of the best from what I have seen...
I added the bold. Moderators cannot moderate. Sad Mark, really, REALLY SAD!
A problem arises however when a situation develops that is serious but we do not have a very well defined policy or procedure on how to deal with it. In a case like this we step back so as not to make the situation worse, until we can discuss things with Mark and figure out what to do. Situations like that can be frustrating to us as we at the time feel powerless to do anything and really want to fix things now. I believe timzcat was expressing himself in this kind of a frustration as I share it with him. This is not however a result of Mark not listening to us but rather a result of Mark not being around right now.
Last edited by evo_dan; Jan 18, 2004 at 03:51 PM.
I would imagine that part of the seriousness of the problem is that Dynoflash is currently banned from doing business on this forum but now seens to have found a backdoor way back into selling his product on this forum through Buscher. The ECUs are not going to be shipped to Buscher, but straight to Al. David B. even said that he is even going to leave pricing to Al. Thats got to be kind of close to pushing the limits of his ban. Personally, I'll accept any decision by Mark. It isn't really a bign deal to me as long as Al doesn't go back to his old ways.
We're actually assessing the situation and coming up with some rules and methods to solve them the best we can. I hope understand that moderators get a lot of flack on auto sites (especially this one) and do this out of their own good intentions for the community. Sometimes frustrations show a little more than usual, although I don't think it went WAY over the line in this case.
My goal right now is to try and restore some peace and quiet so the mods can relax a little
Mark
My goal right now is to try and restore some peace and quiet so the mods can relax a little

Mark
Originally posted by KK
We're actually assessing the situation and coming up with some rules and methods to solve them the best we can. I hope understand that moderators get a lot of flack on auto sites (especially this one) and do this out of their own good intentions for the community. Sometimes frustrations show a little more than usual, although I don't think it went WAY over the line in this case.
My goal right now is to try and restore some peace and quiet so the mods can relax a little
Mark
We're actually assessing the situation and coming up with some rules and methods to solve them the best we can. I hope understand that moderators get a lot of flack on auto sites (especially this one) and do this out of their own good intentions for the community. Sometimes frustrations show a little more than usual, although I don't think it went WAY over the line in this case.
My goal right now is to try and restore some peace and quiet so the mods can relax a little

Mark
Thread Starter
Evolving Member
iTrader: (2)
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 227
Likes: 0
From: Twin Cities, MN
Originally posted by Smogrunner
I would imagine that part of the seriousness of the problem is that Dynoflash is currently banned from doing business on this forum but now seens to have found a backdoor way back into selling his product on this forum through Buscher. The ECUs are not going to be shipped to Buscher, but straight to Al. David B. even said that he is even going to leave pricing to Al. Thats got to be kind of close to pushing the limits of his ban. Personally, I'll accept any decision by Mark. It isn't really a bign deal to me as long as Al doesn't go back to his old ways.
I would imagine that part of the seriousness of the problem is that Dynoflash is currently banned from doing business on this forum but now seens to have found a backdoor way back into selling his product on this forum through Buscher. The ECUs are not going to be shipped to Buscher, but straight to Al. David B. even said that he is even going to leave pricing to Al. Thats got to be kind of close to pushing the limits of his ban. Personally, I'll accept any decision by Mark. It isn't really a bign deal to me as long as Al doesn't go back to his old ways.
I voiced my concern and evo_dan confirmed that there are situations where mods cannot act quickly enough to contain a potentially out-of-hand situation - LIKE THE ONE YOU ARE TRYING TO START RIGHT NOW, YOU ****HEAD! I know I will probably get a warning for this one, but this is REALLY ridiculous!
And I do believe Mark will come up with a viable solution. Thanks Mark for taking the time to address my concerns.
Trending Topics
All vendors will be held to the same standards and we're working on some rules to help improve the flow of the site. There's gonna be a learning curve in the process, but eventually it will get there 
vr430, while you may not agree with what was said, there are much better ways to express yourself through pms, notifying a moderator, etc. Please do not use insults and bring on any flames.
Thanks,
Mark

vr430, while you may not agree with what was said, there are much better ways to express yourself through pms, notifying a moderator, etc. Please do not use insults and bring on any flames.
Thanks,
Mark
Originally posted by KK
All vendors will be held to the same standards and we're working on some rules to help improve the flow of the site. There's gonna be a learning curve in the process, but eventually it will get there
vr430, while you may not agree with what was said, there are much better ways to express yourself through pms, notifying a moderator, etc. Please do not use insults and bring on any flames.
Thanks,
Mark
All vendors will be held to the same standards and we're working on some rules to help improve the flow of the site. There's gonna be a learning curve in the process, but eventually it will get there

vr430, while you may not agree with what was said, there are much better ways to express yourself through pms, notifying a moderator, etc. Please do not use insults and bring on any flames.
Thanks,
Mark
Originally posted by Secret Chimp
Please don't worry about other board members. If he was (or wasn't) warned, that is for Shiv to tell, not for us.
SC~
Please don't worry about other board members. If he was (or wasn't) warned, that is for Shiv to tell, not for us.
SC~
Why does that not surprise me.
Evolved Member
iTrader: (2)
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 2,367
Likes: 0
From: Between the Blue and the Sand
I'm not sure what you are alluding to? We don't usually go around pointing out who got warned and who didn't. If you want to know if Shiv got warned, ask him.
There is no favoritism going on here, contrary to what a few people are saying. Before we disassociated ourselves from Dynoflash, people thought we were favoring him because he offered free flashes to site staff. Now that Dynoflash is gone, people think we are favoring Shiv because he is still a vendor in good standing on this site. You can't have it both ways.
I just wish people would wait till they knew what they were talking about before they started complaining.
SC~
There is no favoritism going on here, contrary to what a few people are saying. Before we disassociated ourselves from Dynoflash, people thought we were favoring him because he offered free flashes to site staff. Now that Dynoflash is gone, people think we are favoring Shiv because he is still a vendor in good standing on this site. You can't have it both ways.
I just wish people would wait till they knew what they were talking about before they started complaining.
SC~
Last edited by Secret Chimp; Jan 22, 2004 at 02:44 PM.
I don't think you guys get it.
Shiv started a flame war.
Al got banned.
This basically communicates that if you're a paying vendor, you can stir up the **** all you like and not have to worry about the consequences.
If that's the kind of site this is going to be, I think you've already noticed reduced board traffic the past week or so and this trend will continue, I hope, until you get the picture.
Shiv started a flame war.
Al got banned.
This basically communicates that if you're a paying vendor, you can stir up the **** all you like and not have to worry about the consequences.
If that's the kind of site this is going to be, I think you've already noticed reduced board traffic the past week or so and this trend will continue, I hope, until you get the picture.
Thread Starter
Evolving Member
iTrader: (2)
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 227
Likes: 0
From: Twin Cities, MN
I started THIS particular thread because I saw an instance where a thread went to **** - [bold] in my opinion [/bold] - due to luck of proper attention from moderators, which was further collaborated by timzcat's comment quoted at the beginning. It has NOTHING to do with the actual subject matter of the "****" thread but all about the lack of perceived moderator power to intervene in a timely manner to keep this board civil.
Mods and Mark came on and offered that they are working on improving the process. I am willing to give them a benefit of the doubt - time will definitely tell if they have succeeded or not.
Once again, this thread is NOT about the subject matter of any other particular thread, but what Mark and Mods are doing to improve the quality of the board. And, for people to voice suggestions on how to improve things...
Mods and Mark came on and offered that they are working on improving the process. I am willing to give them a benefit of the doubt - time will definitely tell if they have succeeded or not.
Once again, this thread is NOT about the subject matter of any other particular thread, but what Mark and Mods are doing to improve the quality of the board. And, for people to voice suggestions on how to improve things...



