Fujita SRI (I know, I know..)
Thread Starter
Newbie
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 13
Likes: 0
From: is in between your momma's vaj..lmao
Fujita SRI (I know, I know..)
Before any of you guys say "not again" or "enough already" or something else worse than those, I just wanna put this down for anyone who has this intake and just so ya'll now what Fujita did to fix the CEL issues being thrown by their SRI. I called them around end of April to address the issue of their SRI. I haven't got the CEL yet but I kinda pretended I did. So I told them the issue, blah blah blah, fast forward, so they said they have a replacement pipe and they'll send me as soon as it gets to the states coz they haven't been shipped yet from Asia. So I waited, checked with them every 2 weeks, finally wednesday last week, I emailed their sales rep to check for updates and they said they already shipped me my replacement pipe on June 15. So UPS delivered it Monday, but Fujita never told me they didn't pay for brokerage fee and my sister didn't have money that time. So they came back yesterday, my sis had the money and received the pipe. Here are some pics that I took to show the difference between the 2.
Here you can see that the MAF Sensor holder on the new pipe is closer to the end of filter. Also I kinda find the pipe is a lil bit wider than the old one. Oh yeah, and the new pipe didn't come with a "F5" logo. I have to remove it from the old one and double taped it onto the new pipe.



So I went ahead and installed them, and then, a dead end. The new pipe's bracket (w/ever it's called) that goes to the vibration mount aren't properly aligned! I thought it was just the way I tightened the mount but I tried it on the old pipe and it slides in w/out any problems. So I just tried to find a way just so the bracket would rest on the mount. Also, the cable that connects to the MAF Sensor was zip tied to the thing that holds the battery and won't reach the sensor so I cut, connect it to the MAF, then zip tied it again.
Anyway, it's still early to tell if this really fix the CEL issues. I would keep you all posted if anything comes up!
(hopefully I don't get the CEL tomorrow - or at all!)
Here you can see that the MAF Sensor holder on the new pipe is closer to the end of filter. Also I kinda find the pipe is a lil bit wider than the old one. Oh yeah, and the new pipe didn't come with a "F5" logo. I have to remove it from the old one and double taped it onto the new pipe.



So I went ahead and installed them, and then, a dead end. The new pipe's bracket (w/ever it's called) that goes to the vibration mount aren't properly aligned! I thought it was just the way I tightened the mount but I tried it on the old pipe and it slides in w/out any problems. So I just tried to find a way just so the bracket would rest on the mount. Also, the cable that connects to the MAF Sensor was zip tied to the thing that holds the battery and won't reach the sensor so I cut, connect it to the MAF, then zip tied it again.
Anyway, it's still early to tell if this really fix the CEL issues. I would keep you all posted if anything comes up!
(hopefully I don't get the CEL tomorrow - or at all!)
Last edited by stitchflip; Jun 23, 2009 at 09:59 PM.
Not bashing or any of the things you first stated, but I have to know why you went with a product that has KNOWN issues in the first place? It's like the RRM header, i've wanted headers as one of my 1st mods (Full line exhaust system) But I won't get RRM's because I already know just like a fat chick in a mini-skirt and belly-top , they've got issues!
Not bashing or any of the things you first stated, but I have to know why you went with a product that has KNOWN issues in the first place? It's like the RRM header, i've wanted headers as one of my 1st mods (Full line exhaust system) But I won't get RRM's because I already know just like a fat chick in a mini-skirt and belly-top , they've got issues!

Is this intake cheaper than the others?
Thread Starter
Newbie
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 13
Likes: 0
From: is in between your momma's vaj..lmao
@ Dro: just coz! lol..nah, I really didn't wanna get a CAI - maybe if I have a MT, I would def get a CAI..I posted this up just in case anyone who has it (apparently it's just me) would know what Fujita did to try resolve this problem.@ Greedy_son: yup, cheaper than CAI's for sure.
There is the RRM SRI, which has little to no complaints about it. But everyone else here who had the Fujita got rid of it for either RRM's or a CAI., so I doubt there will be much of a response towards their upgraded version.



