Already shipped a few, going to be a GREAT turbo.

 

Wow! Nice turbo. Would like to see results before buying this beast. I see what it did on that 3.4 with 10:1 cr. it spooled up quick. But what will it do on our built 2.0's, 2.1's, 2.3's and the 2.4's? Will the spool be a little bit more laggyer or quicker on a smaller displacement motor?

 

Less displacement usually equals slower spool.

 

Oh, but by how much though?

 

Very very interesting seeing that the 64 outspooled the 67 and then made a little more overall power too due to being more in the happy efficiency zone. For us and in general, that basically means that we can run slightly less boost on a 64 vs the 67 and equal or surpass the power a 67 would make if Im thinking correctly...right?? Say 64 is run at 42psi and makes 900, the 67 might need like 44 or 45psi to make 900?

Btw, everyone point and laugh at the 2JZ's abysmal low end power

 

I found the wheel specs on Real St Performance

Comp wheel 2.535" (64.39mm) inducer / 3.410" (86.61mm) exducer
Turbine wheel 2.920" (74.17mm) inducer / 2.600" (66.00mm) exducer


The wheel specs of the 67 and 64 are identical with the exception on the inducer of the comp wheel, which would explain the spool advantage going to the 64. The exducer is the same and the exhaust wheel is obviously the same which also shows why the two turbos really make the same power as each other.

Does anyone else kinda think FP shot themselves in the foot with the 64 coming out and being so close to the 67? Thats like Porsche with the Cayman basically being a better car than the 911

 

Well there is tons of 6266 graphs on the forum, and the 2jz on the previous page had a 6266 results as well. I have always done a percentage between turbo's and been fairly close when choosing.

We know they spool almost the same, so you can just find a graph of a 6266 and then figure it makes about the same power as a 6766.

 

please pm me the price on the 6466

 

PM sent!

 

Mmmmmffffff Im torn. Ultimately, the better powerband of the 6466 will trump the slight topend advantage the 6766 will have, which I cant see being anymore than 10-20whp.

It is decided. 64 it will be. Need money now

 

Looking forward to see a dyno chart

 

A few comparison's on the previous page, albeit a Supra but it still gives you an idea once you compare it to the 6262 and 6765 on the same graph.

 

You guys better make it out to Proving Grounds 2012! Its going to be even more insane this year!

 

What turbo you have o your car now?