Random Technologies High Flow Cat
Evolved Member
iTrader: (27)
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 1,699
Likes: 0
From: Poughkeepsie, NY / South West, Florida
Hey man, how did the cat work for you? What numbers did you put down with the cat and i/c piping? I wish I coulda stuck around to see yours...
Bobby
Bobby
EvoM Guru
iTrader: (50)
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 9,675
Likes: 132
From: Tri-Cities, WA // Portland, OR
I've had mine installed for about three months now. No catalyst efficiency CELs until just a few days ago, and now I'm finding that I'm getting an catalyst efficiency CEL after repeated high rpm runs. I cleard the first CEL, and a few days later when I got on the throttle again, I got another CEL. Seems that the Random Tech cat can't match the stock unit's efficiency. If you have seen the stock cat, that may surprise you because the stock cat has two catalyst bricks with the rear O2 sensor sitting in between. The first brick is quite short, and I wouldn't think that it offers much catalyst capacity.
Last edited by mrfred; Mar 27, 2007 at 06:52 AM.
EvoM Guru
iTrader: (50)
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 9,675
Likes: 132
From: Tri-Cities, WA // Portland, OR
Reduced exhaust fume smells?
Just wondering if any of you guys have gone from a test pip to a random tech. HFC noticed a big decrease in exhaust fume smells? B/C quite frankly, this is my only reason in getting one, and saving the environment some doesn't hurt either..hah.
I have the cheater and the only cel I throw is the p0300, and as far as exhaust fumes it seems about the same as stock to me (although I can't say compared to test pipe, never had one).
you could almost put your nose in my tailpipe stock and not smell anything, so thats good!
if the random tech cat is carb approved then what is the CARB EO number? i wasnt able to find it in the carb website http://www.arb.ca.gov/msprog/aftermk...es/amquery.php


