TTP Scott is the MAN!
Thread Starter
Evolving Member
iTrader: (46)
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 153
Likes: 2
From: Riverview, Fl
TTP Scott is the MAN!
Big thanks to Scott who got my car tuned perfectly!
I have been battling some low rpm stuttering issues since the FP4 cam install.
Scott threw the car up on the dyno and tried a few things only to find that the 1000cc injectors I had in where causing low rpm fueling issues with my new FP4 cams.
Scott suggested we try some 745's he had and once he reflashed it the car was running like a champ.
Car ended up with 382 WHP and 335 tq and ran 12.2 on the TTP mustang Dyno.
Mods:
3" Cat back, Intake, boost controller, 255 walbro/745cc, Street FMIC, BRgt3071, FP4 and 93 pump no meth.
Again I would recommend TTP anytime you need something done.
Top notch professional shop that can make great numbers, even on a turd like mine.
I have been battling some low rpm stuttering issues since the FP4 cam install.
Scott threw the car up on the dyno and tried a few things only to find that the 1000cc injectors I had in where causing low rpm fueling issues with my new FP4 cams.
Scott suggested we try some 745's he had and once he reflashed it the car was running like a champ.
Car ended up with 382 WHP and 335 tq and ran 12.2 on the TTP mustang Dyno.
Mods:
3" Cat back, Intake, boost controller, 255 walbro/745cc, Street FMIC, BRgt3071, FP4 and 93 pump no meth.
Again I would recommend TTP anytime you need something done.
Top notch professional shop that can make great numbers, even on a turd like mine.
I too had my car tuned by Scott. He did a great job and the performance boost was incredible! I now have an EVO X and can't wait for Scott to dive into the X as he did previous models.
Evolved Member
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,123
Likes: 0
From: Seattle
i think thats cool, ive never seen a car do a 1/4 mile on a dyno. i think with that power you should be way better than 12.2 tho.
i had 12.2 on stock clutch with bad 1.7 60 foot, with TBE, hks264/272 and a tune(made 310whp/wtq on a mustang dyno).
so like i said i think your car should break into the 11's with that power. maybe the dyno doesnt read as accurate as the real thing, but i sure think its cool either way
good stuff!
i had 12.2 on stock clutch with bad 1.7 60 foot, with TBE, hks264/272 and a tune(made 310whp/wtq on a mustang dyno).
so like i said i think your car should break into the 11's with that power. maybe the dyno doesnt read as accurate as the real thing, but i sure think its cool either way
good stuff!
Thread Starter
Evolving Member
iTrader: (46)
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 153
Likes: 2
From: Riverview, Fl
i think thats cool, ive never seen a car do a 1/4 mile on a dyno. i think with that power you should be way better than 12.2 tho.
i had 12.2 on stock clutch with bad 1.7 60 foot, with TBE, hks264/272 and a tune(made 310whp/wtq on a mustang dyno).
so like i said i think your car should break into the 11's with that power. maybe the dyno doesnt read as accurate as the real thing, but i sure think its cool either way good stuff!
i had 12.2 on stock clutch with bad 1.7 60 foot, with TBE, hks264/272 and a tune(made 310whp/wtq on a mustang dyno).
so like i said i think your car should break into the 11's with that power. maybe the dyno doesnt read as accurate as the real thing, but i sure think its cool either way
good stuff!Just knowing the 1/4 potential is great for me.
The car is so fun to drive!
Trending Topics
i think thats cool, ive never seen a car do a 1/4 mile on a dyno. i think with that power you should be way better than 12.2 tho.
i had 12.2 on stock clutch with bad 1.7 60 foot, with TBE, hks264/272 and a tune(made 310whp/wtq on a mustang dyno).
so like i said i think your car should break into the 11's with that power. maybe the dyno doesnt read as accurate as the real thing, but i sure think its cool either way good stuff!
i had 12.2 on stock clutch with bad 1.7 60 foot, with TBE, hks264/272 and a tune(made 310whp/wtq on a mustang dyno).
so like i said i think your car should break into the 11's with that power. maybe the dyno doesnt read as accurate as the real thing, but i sure think its cool either way
good stuff!We have tested the dyno to the tenth in the 1/4 mi so far and so far it has been accurate.
The car is also difficult to launch with the laggy, slow responding turbo. It took 2-3 tries to ride the clutch the right way to get a decent 1.74. On the stock turbo, we can cut a 1.4 60' like Curt Brown
Thread Starter
Evolving Member
iTrader: (46)
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 153
Likes: 2
From: Riverview, Fl
The 3071 is a little laggy for sure and it probably best to go with a 3076 since you gain more top end power with the same lag.
A tubular manifold would definitly make more power and will probably be on my list after I enjoy the car for a while.
The FP4 cams do make some great power. I don't have any before and after dyno graphs but the butt dyno says they are making power with this setup.
Scott had to tune the mivec map a little different to bring the car alive.
In the end the car isn't making bad power but its not much more than cars with Stock size turbo's.
A tubular manifold would definitly make more power and will probably be on my list after I enjoy the car for a while.
The FP4 cams do make some great power. I don't have any before and after dyno graphs but the butt dyno says they are making power with this setup.
Scott had to tune the mivec map a little different to bring the car alive.
In the end the car isn't making bad power but its not much more than cars with Stock size turbo's.
Thread Starter
Evolving Member
iTrader: (46)
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 153
Likes: 2
From: Riverview, Fl
I know meth would have made more power ont he stock turbo, I had a ttp meth kit and sold it since my wife drives the car as well and cannot be trusted to check the meth level.
I am all about 93 pump and am happy with the car and the numbers for the mods it has.
I am all about 93 pump and am happy with the car and the numbers for the mods it has.
