Tomioka Racing 4.0 Final drive 2400rpm at 60mph
#31
I could see it being lame on that size turbo even on a 2.3 or 2.4.
The fact that my car can make full boost at 2500rpm and peak hp is pretty low it does not seem to be a problem. I do notice if I short shift it to much I notice the drop in hp.
Was the VIII trans stock or IX 1st gear.
I dont think 1st is to bad but a IX 1st with the final drive would really suck.
The fact that my car can make full boost at 2500rpm and peak hp is pretty low it does not seem to be a problem. I do notice if I short shift it to much I notice the drop in hp.
Was the VIII trans stock or IX 1st gear.
I dont think 1st is to bad but a IX 1st with the final drive would really suck.
#32
Evolving Member
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Australia
Posts: 371
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
This thread is interesting to me , I'm in Australia with an Evo 6GSR BTW . It has the taller 1st 4th and 5th ratios std with that 4.5 final drive .
I'm sort of interested in the 4.1 FDR with the shorter 1st 4th and 5th ratios but in a 2L with a 9RS turbo . The shorter 1 4 5 ratios would be a tad shorter so possibly a bit easier for a low torque delivery 2L to pull .
I guess the other side of the low down pulling power is MiVec - or rather the lack of it in pre 9 Evos .
Did I read somewhere about a Ralliart 4.3 FDR option ?
Cheers A .
I'm sort of interested in the 4.1 FDR with the shorter 1st 4th and 5th ratios but in a 2L with a 9RS turbo . The shorter 1 4 5 ratios would be a tad shorter so possibly a bit easier for a low torque delivery 2L to pull .
I guess the other side of the low down pulling power is MiVec - or rather the lack of it in pre 9 Evos .
Did I read somewhere about a Ralliart 4.3 FDR option ?
Cheers A .
#33
Evolved Member
iTrader: (34)
I have a IX 1st gear with 4.11 final drive and I seriously find not much difference in driveability. I have no problems pulling it out of my underground garage and I even do stop and go driving up a 20 degree slope by where I live. Fwd cars with econo tires often spin just trying to get going from a stop (not joking). Thats with a carbon clutch btw. And it doesn't feel slow in any gear as well. Theres less shove and drama than with my old 6spd in 3rd but the rate at which it accumulates speed isn't different. Only annoying part is reverse....its a little too fast for parallel parking without slipping the clutch.
For comparison I also have a IX 5th gear and revs at 80mph is around 3250.
EDIT: Forgot to mention my spool improved so drastically with the taller gear that my boost maps all need a retune. I'm on stock 05 VIII turbo.
For comparison I also have a IX 5th gear and revs at 80mph is around 3250.
EDIT: Forgot to mention my spool improved so drastically with the taller gear that my boost maps all need a retune. I'm on stock 05 VIII turbo.
Last edited by deeman101; Jan 17, 2012 at 08:30 PM.
#34
Evolved Member
iTrader: (30)
This thread is interesting to me , I'm in Australia with an Evo 6GSR BTW . It has the taller 1st 4th and 5th ratios std with that 4.5 final drive .
I'm sort of interested in the 4.1 FDR with the shorter 1st 4th and 5th ratios but in a 2L with a 9RS turbo . The shorter 1 4 5 ratios would be a tad shorter so possibly a bit easier for a low torque delivery 2L to pull .
I guess the other side of the low down pulling power is MiVec - or rather the lack of it in pre 9 Evos .
Did I read somewhere about a Ralliart 4.3 FDR option ?
Cheers A .
I'm sort of interested in the 4.1 FDR with the shorter 1st 4th and 5th ratios but in a 2L with a 9RS turbo . The shorter 1 4 5 ratios would be a tad shorter so possibly a bit easier for a low torque delivery 2L to pull .
I guess the other side of the low down pulling power is MiVec - or rather the lack of it in pre 9 Evos .
Did I read somewhere about a Ralliart 4.3 FDR option ?
Cheers A .
As far as I know that is only a dog box option? I could be wrong, I know of only one local in the US that has the 4.30 gears in his rally car (or did). I cant recall if it was a normal synchro box or not though.
I have a IX 1st gear with 4.11 final drive and I seriously find not much difference in driveability. I have no problems pulling it out of my underground garage and I even do stop and go driving up a 20 degree slope by where I live. Fwd cars with econo tires often spin just trying to get going from a stop (not joking). Thats with a carbon clutch btw. And it doesn't feel slow in any gear as well. Theres less shove and drama than with my old 6spd in 3rd but the rate at which it accumulates speed isn't different. Only annoying part is reverse....its a little too fast for parallel parking without slipping the clutch.
For comparison I also have a IX 5th gear and revs at 80mph is around 3250.
EDIT: Forgot to mention my spool improved so drastically with the taller gear that my boost maps all need a retune. I'm on stock 05 VIII turbo.
For comparison I also have a IX 5th gear and revs at 80mph is around 3250.
EDIT: Forgot to mention my spool improved so drastically with the taller gear that my boost maps all need a retune. I'm on stock 05 VIII turbo.
#35
Evolved Member
iTrader: (34)
#37
Evolved Member
iTrader: (20)
Has anyone really pushed these drag racing yet? I've got a long rod 2.4 on 26s that I'm wanting to replace the stock evo 8 fd to drop my rpm from 9200 to help engine longevity. I'm wondering if this will hold the abuse and be a better alternative to an hks 4.11 as the hks seem to be hard to come by currently.